• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

It's Alive ( barely )

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lightweight
  • Start date Start date May 3, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Lightweight

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
28
0
0
Oklahoma
May 3, 2007
#1
  • May 3, 2007
  • #1
I tore the engine down, life happened, and 1 1/2 years later it's back together. I rebuilt the whole thing and replaced all the stock H/C/I stuff w/ Y303 heads, a Comp cam ( .533/.544, 215/220, 114 ) and a Cobra intake. I also installed 24lb injectors and deleted the smog pump. I'm still SD

I went to fire it for the first time, and while it started, it's definately not right. It runs extremely rough, blows more black smoke than a locomotive, and has to be kept above 1200 rpm to stay running. What do I do? What could I have messed up? I need help. This is my 3rd SBF to rebuild, but the first 2 were 289's. I wouldn't have a problem if this one had a carb too, but I'm totally new to EFI and have no idea where to start or even what to look for.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,944
2,898
194
Middle of Maine
May 3, 2007
#2
  • May 3, 2007
  • #2
You did not say what year the car was. So I will hazard a guess that when you installed the bigger fuel injectors you did not replace the MAF with one calibrated for the 24 lb/hr injectors, or have the ECU flashed for the injector change. If that is the case the ECU still thinks that the engine has the stock 19 lb/hr injectors and is overfueling the engine because of the larger injectors. If that is not the case, then I need more info to help out.
 

BlooDReigN

Member
Feb 22, 2004
283
1
16
Calgary, Alberta
May 3, 2007
#3
  • May 3, 2007
  • #3
Your problem is the speed density. It doesn't have a clue what to do with that big cam and the bigger injectors. You need to do a mass air swap with a MAF calibrated for those injectors.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 3, 2007
#4
  • May 3, 2007
  • #4
I don't know if the cam is causing any problems, but the injectors certainly are...

Your options are...
  1. Put the 19's back in, as I don't think you require 24's yet
  2. Convert to MAF, as mentioned above, using a calibrated MAF
  3. Get the SD ecu custom tuned or get a personal tuner and make the necessary changes yourself

Again, I am not certain that the cam is causing any issues.

The injectors ARE an issue though.

EDIT: Can you measure your intake vac readings at idle?

Good Luck and Let Us Know,
jason
 

Lightweight

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
28
0
0
Oklahoma
May 4, 2007
#5
  • May 4, 2007
  • #5
The car is an '87 LX 5.0 w/ an AOD. I had discussed my combo with some of the SD guru's on another site, and was under the assumption that the computer was able to trim 24lb injectors. Just nothing larger than that. I also made sure to pick a cam that fell just within the limits of what was said to work. I know I'm pushing the edge, but even though the cam is high lift, it still has a mild duration and LSA. Aren't those the #'s that are important to SD?

I've had a couple people suggest a new MAP. Would a bad MAP sensor cause this?

I'll try and get a vac reading. How much vaccuum should I have?
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
May 4, 2007
#6
  • May 4, 2007
  • #6
map would cause it to jump up and down at idle. ITs not the cam and the speed density I ran my car for a year with the TFS1 cam and cobra intake with out a proablem. What your fuel pressure at?
 

Lightweight

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
28
0
0
Oklahoma
May 4, 2007
#7
  • May 4, 2007
  • #7
Ok, unless the stock regulator went bad on me, the FP is whatever the factory setting is. I don't have an adjustable regulator or a FP gage. Do I need them?

The set the TPS voltage to .94 v

The timing is 11 degrees btdc

The vaccuum @ 1000rpm is 6 in. ( That's the lowest rpm I can keep it running )

It fires right off when I turn the key.

So you don't think it's the MAP? I was going to replace it anyway, until I found out what they cost. Those things aren't cheap!
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 5, 2007
#8
  • May 5, 2007
  • #8
You have a couple of issues...

The 24's are wrong, you need to get the 19's in place.
The computer cannot correct for a different size injector!

You should be getting more than 6" at idle.
Either you have a vac leak, or there is something wrong with your valve timing.
I would guess vac leak...

Start with the injectors.
While you have the upper manifold off, inspect all of the vac hoses for cracks.


jason
 
B

blown90

Member
Jun 28, 2003
35
1
6
New York
May 5, 2007
#9
  • May 5, 2007
  • #9
There are so many factors that could be causing this. He could have even installed the distributor off a tooth!
 

whtpny

New Member
Dec 8, 2002
338
0
0
Spokane WA.
May 5, 2007
#10
  • May 5, 2007
  • #10
Just start with the injecters. One step at a time.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 5, 2007
#11
  • May 5, 2007
  • #11
Bullitt347 said:
...or have the ECU flashed for the injector change.
Click to expand...
It's not possible to flash the ECU in these cars. It would require a chip to be added on.

blown90 said:
There are so many factors that could be causing this. He could have even installed the distributor off a tooth!
Click to expand...
The only problem installing the distributor off a tooth would cause is limiting the turning ability of the distributor itself, when trying to time it. If you could physically turn it enough, you could install it 180° out and still get it timed correctly.

All signs point to using the 24lb injectors with the SD computer. I agree with everything vristang has recommended in trying to get it running right, but in my opinion, your best bet is to take the plunge into the MAF conversion.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 6, 2007
#12
  • May 6, 2007
  • #12
Matt,
Actually with EFI (EDIT: SEFI) you can get the dist '1 tooth off'
The car usually runs, but just doesn't feel right.

The ecu uses the dist signal to time the injector pulses.
Because of this the dist needs to be precisely synchronized with the camshaft/crankshaft.

A little off topic, but it's important to get the word out on that...

jason
 
B

blown90

Member
Jun 28, 2003
35
1
6
New York
May 6, 2007
#13
  • May 6, 2007
  • #13
Thank you, from my own experience!!
 

Lightweight

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
28
0
0
Oklahoma
May 7, 2007
#14
  • May 7, 2007
  • #14
I really was hoping to avoid a MA conversion, but it may be my best option. A few of the charts I saw about injector size in relation to horsepower, listed the 19's to only be good to about 280hp. I hoped to be just over 300hp NA with my combo, and have plans for nitrous, so I got the 24's. Was that 280 RWHP instead of crankshaft HP? Could I just get a FP regulator and pull the pressure back on the 24's? Since I didn't plan on reusing them, the 19's have just been sitting out on my workbench. Would they still be okay to use, or will I have to have them cleaned? I'm bound to have a vac leak somewhere, so I'll start looking.

Thanks again for helping out an EFI newbie.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 7, 2007
#15
  • May 7, 2007
  • #15
Most injector calculators will use flywheel Hp, not rwhp.

If you need 24's then the options are MAF conversion, or custom tune the SD system.
MAF conversion may be cheaper in the short term.
If you are considering a tuner package, now is the time to SERIOUSLY consider if you want to take on the role of tuning your own car.

If the 19's have not been contaminated with a lot of dust and debris, then they should be ok. If not 19's are easy to find in a j/y.

Backing off the fuel pressure for the 24's will cause fuel metering issues, due to the lack of sufficient pressure in the fuel lines.


Plugging in the 19's is the best thing you can do at this point. That should clear up most of your issues.
jason
 

Lightweight

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
28
0
0
Oklahoma
May 8, 2007
#16
  • May 8, 2007
  • #16
I know a couple of the vac hoses under the intake could use replacement, so I'll get two things at once. I'll put the 19's back in, and eliminate a possible a vaccuum leak. I'll just have to make sure my 19's are still usable. There is bound to be someone around here to clean / test them for me. Even if I do need the 24's, I'll know for sure that they are the curent problem. I'll start on that tonight and see what happens.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 8, 2007
#17
  • May 8, 2007
  • #17
Sounds like a solid plan

Let us know how it goes...





jason
 

Lightweight

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
28
0
0
Oklahoma
May 8, 2007
#18
  • May 8, 2007
  • #18
Put my 19's back in, and ( aside from losing engine response ) nothing changed. Still won't run below 1000 rpm. Still blows gobs of black gas smoke out the pipes.

If this were a stick shift race car, I'd be all set. Ignore the black cloud, keep the rev's up, and it seems to run great.

Guess I'll put my 24's back in, and look into something else.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 8, 2007
#19
  • May 8, 2007
  • #19
whether you still have the problem or not...
The 24's are wrong for your stock SD ecu.
Put them in if you like, but it may make diagnosing this issue tougher.
You will be diagnosing around a known problem.
I won't harp on it, so this will be the last time I recommend against the 24's (for now anyway).



I need to read over this thread again...
jason


EDIT:
How long did you give it to adjust?
How long did you let it run?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 8, 2007
#20
  • May 8, 2007
  • #20
Lightweight said:
The vaccuum @ 1000rpm is 6 in. ( That's the lowest rpm I can keep it running )
Click to expand...

Lightweight said:
Put my 19's back in, and ( aside from losing engine response ) nothing changed. Still won't run below 1000 rpm. Still blows gobs of black gas smoke out the pipes.
Click to expand...
These 2 things add up to valve timing or a MASSIVE vac leak.

How did you adjust the valves when you put in the cam?

Just for giggles, hook the vac gauge up to the pcv valve. This will either show pressure in the crankcase (this is the normal condition), or it will show crankcase vac (which will indicate a lower intake gasket vac leak, common to the lifter valley).

Pull the vac line from the fuel pressure regulator, and see if it is wet with fuel. When the diaphragm ruptures extra fuel dumps into the intake.


This one should have been the first thing I suggested, my apologies.
Pull the KOEO and KOER diagnostic codes.
If the problem is a sensor, this will clue you into it.


Finally, this is a little beyond my comfort level (I don't normally get involved in the diagnosis of problems, and for good reason), so I am requesting the mods to move this to the general tech thread.
This should give your thread more exposure, as most folks don't check this sub-forum too often.

Good luck,
jason
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
311
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
687
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Today at 11:06 AM
DTCRAWLEY
D
S
Need help asap
  • shaggyman65
  • Dec 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
238
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2025
shaggyman65
S
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
669
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?