• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

I've decided to put a 331 in my car and have a question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68EFIvert
  • Start date Start date Aug 29, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Oct 8, 2009
#21
  • Oct 8, 2009
  • #21
I don't know anything about doing that but I assume my machinist does. The only problem I could see with that is the engine already runs on the warm side and I don't know if that would cause that problem to get worse. I assume when you fill the block you add some sort of dense material to water passages?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 9, 2009
#22
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #22
Yeah, a common brand is Hard Blok block cement.
 
J

js66coupe

Member
May 10, 2009
49
0
7
Florida
Oct 9, 2009
#23
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #23
I was just wondering if others have tried this. I don't know anyone who has done a partial fill on their SBF.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Oct 9, 2009
#24
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #24
i would put some more in the heads, every little CFM helps when it's boosted, and just to make sure you're going to supercharge this 331 right? otherwise i would probably spin it higher to make the power wanted.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Oct 9, 2009
#25
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #25
Well I have solved the block problem and purchased one on flea bay that a guy bought, machined and then changed directions. I got a good deal on it considering it is ready to bolt together. Of course I will have my engine guy look it over before I do anything. It is a new Boss block!
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Oct 9, 2009
#26
  • Oct 9, 2009
  • #26
classic boost said:
i made 500rwhp with those heads and turbos (stock cam & pump gas, too). they're an efficient head.
68efivert, check out the new dart 'shp' blocks.
Click to expand...


Still doesnt change my mind, I wouldnt use those heads on a power adder car. Just my .02 cents.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Oct 10, 2009
#27
  • Oct 10, 2009
  • #27
I would. If 185's will get you into the 8's (<-----believe it), 165's should do OK. 500 should be easy peasy.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Oct 10, 2009
#28
  • Oct 10, 2009
  • #28
I have always heard that the exhaust flow was more important flow wise than the intake. The 165 and 185's have the same flow on the exhaust and at the lift of my Trick Flow Stage 1 cam there is only a 17 cfm difference on the intake valve. On a dyno test listed on the AFR website the engines made very similiar power. The 185 headed engine made about 17 ponies more and 16 ftlbs more. The question is do I care about that for the price I would have to pay and does the difference get magnified when you use boost?
 
S

stonecoldtx

Member
Aug 4, 2007
214
2
18
Dallas, TX
Oct 10, 2009
#29
  • Oct 10, 2009
  • #29
68EFIvert said:
Well I have solved the block problem and purchased one on flea bay that a guy bought, machined and then changed directions. I got a good deal on it considering it is ready to bolt together. Of course I will have my engine guy look it over before I do anything. It is a new Boss block!
Click to expand...

You might want to measure the cylinder walls on that block before you buy pistons . . . in many (or maybe even most) cases, the pistons themselves are the specifiied bore diameter, and you will want to make sure that the pistons you buy have the correct clearance, or you'll have to have it re-machined for the next size larger.

For example, if you're going with an economy stroker kit that has hypereutectic pistons that are exactly 4.030" in diameter, you're going to need less piston skirt to cylinder wall clearance than you would with a forged piston, and vice versa.

Now, if' it's only bored 0.30" over, and it's one of those thick-walled blocks that can take up to a 0.125" overbore, then it would be one I'd consider but I sure wouldn't consider it if it can't take more than a 0.030" overbore, for the reasons specified.

Also, different forged pistons required different piston skirt to cylinder wall clearance figures, too.

IMO, a block that has already been machined isn't my first choice (except for the example above), simply because of this reason, and also because you don't know the quality of the machinework. It could very well be that the reason this guy sold the block is because the machine shop screwed up.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Oct 12, 2009
#30
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #30
68EFIvert said:
I have always heard that the exhaust flow was more important flow wise than the intake.
Click to expand...

That's a tricky statement to address without being wrong in some way. I suppose the correct answer is that it's important for them to flow in the right proportions. Most commonly that is with the exhaust port flowing 80% of the intake. SBFs typically have wheezy stock exhaust ports, so that area gets a lot of attention. In contrast, single carb Honda XR600R/650L bike engines have exhausts that flow in the 95-98% range, so the intake port needs the improvement instead.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 4, 2009
#31
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #31
Well I had my engine builder look over the block but he said that it was bored 4.032 rather than 4.030. He said that it would be a little too loose for his preference and suggested taking it over to .040. I thought why not do a big bore and go 4.125 to give me 347 cubes but that would not allow me to bore it again if I ever had a problem.

How realistic are the max bore limits they place on blocks? I have seen that the max bore on most blocks is 4.030 but they ofter go to 4.060. Do you thing kit would be a problem if I ever had to take the boss block out to 4.155?
 
S

stonecoldtx

Member
Aug 4, 2007
214
2
18
Dallas, TX
Nov 5, 2009
#32
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #32
68EFIvert said:
Well I had my engine builder look over the block but he said that it was bored 4.032 rather than 4.030. He said that it would be a little too loose for his preference and suggested taking it over to .040. I thought why not do a big bore and go 4.125 to give me 347 cubes but that would not allow me to bore it again if I ever had a problem.

How realistic are the max bore limits they place on blocks? I have seen that the max bore on most blocks is 4.030 but they ofter go to 4.060. Do you thing kit would be a problem if I ever had to take the boss block out to 4.155?
Click to expand...

If that block has the extra thick cylinder walls, and can be bored to 4.125, I'd go for it! Chances are you probably wouldn't be doing another overbore on it anyway, since it will likely last for well over 50K miles, possibly 100K, and if it wears out by then, you probably would want to buy a new block anyway . . .

Plus, it will allow you to purchase the oversized pistons, and have your engine builder "fit" the pistons to the bores for closer tolerance control.

Just my humble opinion . . .
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Nov 5, 2009
#33
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #33
If it'll go 4.125, I'd just leave it. It'll cost you twice to bore it to get it that big, and if you go .040 or the minimum each refresh or rebuild, that block should last you forever.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 5, 2009
#34
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #34
I ordered .040 pistons today. I decided it was better to be safe than sorry. I guess I'll be rolling with a 333 under the hood instead of a 331. I had the same thoughts as 10secondgoal on this topic.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Nov 5, 2009
#35
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #35
half the devil?? 333 the new scary number ( especially since it's going to RIP around town!! can't wait to see it done man!
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 5, 2009
#36
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #36
rebel65 said:
half the devil?? 333 the new scary number ( especially since it's going to RIP around town!! can't wait to see it done man!
Click to expand...

Very fitting though. Red car that is missing half of it (convertible). Maybe I'll name her "Christine".
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Nov 5, 2009
#37
  • Nov 5, 2009
  • #37
hey, maybe some day i will name my stang too.. haven't found a better name than 'my baby' yet... lol

and ya i didn't think about the vert part.. very cool now .
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Nov 6, 2009
#38
  • Nov 6, 2009
  • #38
68EFIvert said:
Very fitting though. Red car that is missing half of it (convertible). Maybe I'll name her "Christine".
Click to expand...

The name 'Deathtrap' is taken.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
315
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
956
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
946
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
522
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?