• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Lakewood Bell Housing Alignment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jsprint68
  • Start date Start date Feb 8, 2006

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 8, 2006
#1
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #1
I’m trying to align a 15200 bell on a 302 and well I can’t believe it’s off by this much.

When I run a dial indicator on the crank and fly wheel I only get 0.002” fluctuation.

When I run the dial on the inside the bore I get 0.018” fluctuation (I can get offset dowels for this).

When I run the dial on the Face (bell where the trans mounts) I find the lower half needs to move forward by 0.015”.

I have a 164 tooth flywheel and it doesn’t rub anywhere so could the hole on the bell be off? Do I only accept that Lakewood has the hole in the perfect spot? I can get the dowel pins fpr the bore but I started to think that maybe it’s the bell and not my engine. The bell is new and the mounting surface on the engine is perfectly clean with no burrs. I even went as far as sanding the paint off on the bell but all that did was get red dust all over me.

The Ford manual says that you could shim the bell but I don’t know if that such a good idea. I’ve been farting around with this for 3 days on and off trying to see if I missed something but all seems ok.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 8, 2006
#2
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #2
This is what I got back from Lakewood/Mr.Gasket! Do you agree?

The only proper alignment check should be taken from inside the bore.

I responded with this,

According to the factory Ford manual the Face Alignment must also be checked. This is done to ensure that the flywheel is parallel to the transmission mounting surface. The check is done by attaching the magnetic base to the flywheel and running the dial indicator on the outside face one inch out from the bore opening. 0.005” is the maximum variation allowed.

It's been about 4 days now and no responce from them.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Feb 8, 2006
#3
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #3
I put a Lakewood on my race 289 and never aligned it, never thought about it or knew that you could/had to. Never had a problem.

Since learning of this, I became a little concerned about it if I do it again.

BTW, Robb at Blue Oval Performance in Englewood, CO makes some cool alignment pins for aligning the bellhousing.

BLUE OVAL PERFORMANCE ENG.
3761 Kalamath St.
Englewood, CO 80110 …… (303) 762-8298
Ford oriented engine building and parts.
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Feb 8, 2006
#4
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #4
I have a lakewood bell too. When I put it on my first engine, i spent hours apon hours getting it where it should be. I had a set of ofset dowls. When i put it on my new engine about a month ago i decided that I didnt want todo that again, so I got it within .015 and called it good. I ended up just using the ford strait pins. I cant tell the difference, tranny is just as quiet as before.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 8, 2006
#5
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #5
Like I said, I don’t have a problem getting offset dowels for the bore centering but have a problem with the face alignment. Has anybody run into this problem? Ford said you have to check it where Lakewood says no.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Feb 8, 2006
#6
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #6
Are you getting .018 total variation, or is that on each side of the bore? I thought .010 was the max on either side. Also, you ARE supposed to remove the paint from the center hole bore.

I have a McLeod and didnt need offset dowels. I think it had ~.014 total/.007" per side, so I had a few thou to spare.

Hard to imagine someone standing at a manual mill back in the mid '60s building a more accurate factory part than Lakewood can with CNC equipment.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 8, 2006
#7
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #7
Yea, 0.018” is the total so divided by 2 I get 0.009 and the 0.007 offset dowels will work on centering the bore. The center hole or bore had some flash on it so in order to get and accurate reading I removed it along with any paint that might have been built up. I know that they say if the bell is altered in any way that it would void the SFI rating but I had to get a true reading. I have heard that the McLeod bells where more accurate and they give you a sticker giving you how much it was off center.

Still need to know about the face alignment though. I would think it would be just as critical to get the trans parallel to the block, as it would be to have the bore centered on the crank or pilot bushing.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Feb 8, 2006
#8
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #8
Hard to imagine someone standing at a manual mill back in the mid '60s building a more accurate factory part than Lakewood can with CNC equipment.
Click to expand...

Jsprint68 said:
I know that they say if the bell is altered in any way that it would void the SFI rating but I had to get a true reading.
Click to expand...

When I did my Lakewood 15200 installation, I found that the RAM SFI flywheel's starter ring gear wanted to rub the inside of the bell, just as I was getting it aligned. I spent hours trying to get everything centered but it always wanted to rub. Ended up taking a grinder to the inside of the bell where it wasn't formed just right (where the paint was rubbed off.)

Then when I installed my custom headers, one tube hit the bell to spacer plate mating surface, right by the starter. Why there is 1/2" of extra material there, I'll never know. Anyways, I ended up removing about 1/4" from there. Otherwise, the install was a breeze. . . . .

I too have heard that McLoed had a better setup.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 8, 2006
#9
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #9
Am I the only one that has checked the face alignment?
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Feb 8, 2006
#10
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #10
dennis112 said:
I too have heard that McLoed had a better setup.
Click to expand...

FYI, IMO everybody should be looking first into McLeod. My experience has always been that McLeods are much better aligned to factory blocks than the other brand by far.
 

blue66tang

Founding Member
Jan 20, 2001
1,092
0
0
Medford, OR
Feb 8, 2006
#11
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #11
How do you check for face alignment?
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Feb 9, 2006
#12
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #12
Well, I must have been the exception.
I got a McLeod through Ford Motorsport when I was building my 5.0 project, and it didn't line up at all, I sent it back, and got the Lakewood, which checked out fine.
Bore center, and face parallel.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 9, 2006
#13
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #13
Jsprint68 said:
According to the factory Ford manual the Face Alignment must also be checked. ..... The check is done by attaching the magnetic base to the flywheel and running the dial indicator on the outside face one inch out from the bore opening. 0.005” is the maximum variation allowed.
Click to expand...

I sent another email to Lakewood two days ago and haven’t heard back from them yet. This makes 4 emails over a two weeks time that there is no response to. This does not include the first one that wasn't answered fully.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 11, 2006
#14
  • Feb 11, 2006
  • #14
So what should I do about the face alignment? I’ve sent 5 more emails to Lakewood but they are not responding to them. I’m going to give them a call on Monday because I’m off from work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
71
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
608
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Progress Thread Komo's 1990 GT - Parts Gathering Purgatory & Home Remodel
  • gkomo
  • Sep 23, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 101 102 103
Replies
2K
Views
69K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Wednesday at 10:24 AM
gkomo
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jun 13, 2026
427nostang
4
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?