• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Long Tube or Short Tube?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sparky1202
  • Start date Start date May 18, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

Sparky1202

New Member
May 13, 2010
9
0
0
May 18, 2010
#1
  • May 18, 2010
  • #1
So is there really that much of a difference between the performance of the Shorty headers versus the longtube hearders?
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
May 18, 2010
#2
  • May 18, 2010
  • #2
It's been beaten to death, but yes, a significant difference. The stock manifolds perform as well as any shorty headers on the market, so it's not really worth switching to shorties from a performance perspective. Long tubes can get you 10-20 hp or more depending on your other mods.
 

Night Shifter

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2005
1,710
27
59
Daytona
May 18, 2010
#3
  • May 18, 2010
  • #3
yes...
 

jeremy canter

Member
Dec 2, 2008
402
0
17
Orange County , NY
May 18, 2010
#4
  • May 18, 2010
  • #4
LONG TUBES ALL THE WAY
there just a pain in the @$$ to put on >
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 18, 2010
#5
  • May 18, 2010
  • #5
+1 on the performance, but when you spend $400+ on GOOD headers that actually make power, then another $150+ on a mid pipe. Is really worth the 10-20hp? I have shortys and love the sound after toying with the exhaust a little bit.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 18, 2010
#6
  • May 18, 2010
  • #6
Let see 200 to 300 for shortys that have 0hp gain or 400 for long tubes for 10 to 20 hp. Yes its worth the extra money.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 18, 2010
#7
  • May 18, 2010
  • #7
Don't forget the mid-pipe, in most states they require cats. Your looking at anothe $150 or better then you've lost some of the hp. You can have some make one but iyt won't be as good
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 18, 2010
#8
  • May 18, 2010
  • #8
Ok and your offroad pipe for the shortys was bought at one time which cost anywhere from 180 and up.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 18, 2010
#9
  • May 18, 2010
  • #9
acually mine was free, i traded the bbk catted-h to a friend that didnt like his bassani-x. the bbk-h came from a guy who needed a door glass/installed in his 98gt. the door glass i picked up for nothing at my buddys junkyard that i scavage pretty regularly. the car was on its way to the crusher, so i picked all the glass except for the windsheild. whoch was broke. so no i payed nothimg for it, and im not gonna spend an additional $150+ for another so i could gain 10-20hp. im sorry that kind of money isnt worth it when i can do cams for that whole cost and gain 30-45hp. now if i had a couple grand kickin round, id do it all then have a kick ass quick as hell N/A pi 2v in a 97gt, no one would suspect
 
D

Deleted member 38176

May 18, 2010
#10
  • May 18, 2010
  • #10
Shorty headers have to be the biggest waste of money possible for any car.

Get LT's and dont look back.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
May 18, 2010
#11
  • May 18, 2010
  • #11
fast97gt said:
acually mine was free, i traded the bbk catted-h to a friend that didnt like his bassani-x. the bbk-h came from a guy who needed a door glass/installed in his 98gt. the door glass i picked up for nothing at my buddys junkyard that i scavage pretty regularly. the car was on its way to the crusher, so i picked all the glass except for the windsheild. whoch was broke. so no i payed nothimg for it, and im not gonna spend an additional $150+ for another so i could gain 10-20hp. im sorry that kind of money isnt worth it when i can do cams for that whole cost and gain 30-45hp. now if i had a couple grand kickin round, id do it all then have a kick ass quick as hell N/A pi 2v in a 97gt, no one would suspect
Click to expand...

You keep posting how you don't want to spend that much on 10-20 hp, and would rather get cams... do you realize that you won't get the upper end of the claimed gains from a cam without long tubes? Cams like to breathe, long tubes are a base mod that should be done first before head work and cams.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 18, 2010
#12
  • May 18, 2010
  • #12
You would have to have a stage 2 cam to gain 40 hp from a cam. And with stage 2 cams come valve springs. Or would you not pay for vavle springs because you got something else? Come on we have beat this topic to death. Long tubes or fail.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

May 19, 2010
#13
  • May 19, 2010
  • #13
ninjastang125 said:
You would have to have a stage 2 cam to gain 40 hp from a cam. And with stage 2 cams come valve springs. Or would you not pay for vavle springs because you got something else? Come on we have beat this topic to death. Long tubes or fail.
Click to expand...

*cough*Hi-Tech Stg 2's*cough*

*cough*no springs required*cough*

*cough*just thought Id throw that out there*cough*

*cough*I've got something stuck in my throat*cough*
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
May 19, 2010
#14
  • May 19, 2010
  • #14
i agree but my point is thats a lot of money for a few ponys, besides like nightfire says no springs required for hi-tech stg2, even then i stated that if i had a $2k laying around i would do CAMS, HEADERS, SPRINGS, and still have money left for a TUNE. and gain the whole benefit of everything. if i had to do it again would i? probably not, im not spendin that much money for that little bit of hp. besides phatcat why spend the money now for LTs and mid-pipe, if its really gonna be beneficial after cams and head work
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
May 19, 2010
#15
  • May 19, 2010
  • #15
fast97gt said:
im not spendin that much money for that little bit of hp.
Click to expand...

You are getting so much more than "a little bit of hp."

-You are getting a SOLID 15-20 ft-lbs of torque across the band. Name another mod short of a power adder that does that

-You are getting that amazing sound. Have you ever heard a 2 valve GT (or any Mustang for that matter) with a decent cat-back/mid-pipe combo with long tubes? If you haven't, you need to, and you'll appreciate it. If you have, then you already know exactly what I'm talking about.

-You are getting a mod that responds VERY well to future mods. Long tubes alone will probably add 20-25 ft-lbs of torque across the band with a supercharger or cams. No other mods do that either.

And short tubes do none of that, minus maybe make it sound better. I can't say with certainty because I've never heard a short tube headers car in person.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 19, 2010
#16
  • May 19, 2010
  • #16
Cough*hitechs stage 2 is more like a stage 1*cough
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
May 19, 2010
#17
  • May 19, 2010
  • #17
ninjastang125 said:
Cough*hitechs stage 2 is more like a stage 1*cough
Click to expand...

No they are not. You don't see stage 1 cams making close to 300rwhp. I know I put down 293rwhp on a mustang dyno. You put those cams in a manual and your looking at over 300rwhp.
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
May 19, 2010
#18
  • May 19, 2010
  • #18
Ok they can put downn numbers on a dyno how about performing with other stage 2 cams? There are companies stage 1 cams out performing hitechs stage 2s. Dyno number are not what I live by, I could care less if the car put down 50hp I would be happy of it would et what I want it to. So back to my piont where hitech are a larger stage 1 cam that is advertised as a stage 2.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
May 19, 2010
#19
  • May 19, 2010
  • #19
Whoever made up cam stages needs to be beat with said cams... it's a totally subjective term. The cam specs are what tell the real story.
 

Night Shifter

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2005
1,710
27
59
Daytona
May 19, 2010
#20
  • May 19, 2010
  • #20
Nightfire said:
*cough*Hi-Tech Stg 2's*cough*

*cough*no springs required*cough*

*cough*just thought Id throw that out there*cough*

*cough*I've got something stuck in my throat*cough*
Click to expand...

 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Dipstick
  • wccurtis1963
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
165
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
Willybill32
4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
224
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Tuesday at 5:33 PM
gray owl
G
BBK Long Tube Headers Rusting
  • 93gtmustang
  • Jun 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
247
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 27, 2026
revhead347
G
S550 Headers
  • gray owl
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
231
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Feb 1, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale BBK 1-3/4" long tubes
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Dec 4, 2025
  • Exhaust Parts
Replies
0
Views
283
Exhaust Parts Dec 4, 2025
Kid wita 5oh
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?