• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Long tubes and midpipe.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rudeone707
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Mar 1, 2004
#1
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #1
In the beginning of april i want to order my headers and midpipe. I was looking at MAC LTs and the shorty prochamber. Whats the difference between 1 3/4" vs 1 5/8" HP wise? Would 1 3/4 be over kill? also For the midpipe is 3" to big? my cat back is 3 inch and i kinda wanted to keep it all the same.

Also will MAC headers work on GT40P heads?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Mar 1, 2004
#2
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #2
Rude, you can get a MAC P-specific header that will fit on the stock E7 head. MAC LT's do not have a bung welded into them, and they will probably not pass the strict CA emission laws. I would stay with the 1 5/8" primaries and a 2 1/2" collector. 3 inch tubing is huge and will kill low end torque due to lost back pressure. I would get a 2 1/2" Prochamber - that will bolt right up to the 3" catback. Are you sure the Magnaflow kit is 3", mine is 2.5" all the way through.

Joe
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Mar 1, 2004
#3
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #3
Joes95GT said:
Rude, you can get a MAC P-specific header that will fit on the stock E7 head. MAC LT's do not have a bung welded into them, and they will probably not pass the strict CA emission laws. I would stay with the 1 5/8" primaries and a 2 1/2" collector. 3 inch tubing is huge and will kill low end torque due to lost back pressure. I would get a 2 1/2" Prochamber - that will bolt right up to the 3" catback. Are you sure the Magnaflow kit is 3", mine is 2.5" all the way through.

Joe
Click to expand...
i was pretty sure that it was 3 inch catback with 3 1/2" tips.

emissions are not too much of a concern for me. I know someone, and if worse comes to worse i will just put the stock stuff back on.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 1, 2004
#4
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #4
Joes95GT said:
MAC LT's do not have a bung welded into them, and they will probably not pass the strict CA emission laws.

Joe
Click to expand...

My MAC's and everyone else that I've heard from had the EGR bung on them. MAC long tubes will fit P heads also. Killer95 has them on his car with P heads.

Jake
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 1, 2004
#5
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #5
Rude

My 94-95 Mac lt's had a bung for egr.

IMHO the 1 3/4 lt's would cause a low end loss of torque.

Later
Grady
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 1, 2004
#6
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #6
How much of a difference can 1/8" make? Grady, you talking about how the ports of the AFR's were a little covered up by the 1 5/8" have got me thinking if 1 3/4" would have been a better choice. But on stock E7's 1 3/4" would be a little too much IMO. I noticed little to no low end loss on my car with the LT's.

Jake
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Mar 1, 2004
#7
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #7
I'm not calling you guys wrong, but I never saw a set of MAC headers with an EGR bung on them, but then again, the last set I installed was more than a year ago.

Jake, remember that we are not just talking about a flat 1/8 inch, we are talking about 3 feet of an 1/8 inch difference. Don't worry about the headers covering the exhaust ports, tons of people are running LTs with AFRs and look at their numbers - they don't seem to be affected at all. They probably only cover 1/16 on each side, and if you were that set on getting the flange to match the exhaust port, you could dremel out the flange on the header. I doubt you would gain anything by it though.

Joe
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Mar 1, 2004
#8
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #8
Next year i want to drop in a DSS 331 w/ AFR 185s with a blower. So i didnt really want to have to buy 2 sets of headers for my car.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 1, 2004
#9
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #9
GTJake said:
How much of a difference can 1/8" make? Grady, you talking about how the ports of the AFR's were a little covered up by the 1 5/8" have got me thinking if 1 3/4" would have been a better choice. But on stock E7's 1 3/4" would be a little too much IMO. I noticed little to no low end loss on my car with the LT's.

Jake
Click to expand...

I based the low end loss of larger headers due to various times in the past I have seen this happen when the exhaust system is too big for the combo.

Have you ever heard that 1&1/2 inch is better than 1&5/8 inch for very mild combos with small stuff like, just pulleys or just a K&N etc.

If the car will be modded with many parts in the future then yes, the 1&5/8 size would be a better choice.

Then there is the weight of our cars also. If the car is light, like a fox coupe, then the time spent in the lower rpm range is significantly less than a heavy car like ours. Low end torque loss is recovered quicker with less weight. Perfect example of why gears with a ratio of at least 3.73 is so important in our heavy cars. (NA by the way)

The larger header will make more power in the upper rpm range but the low end will suffer. IMHO, not good for a heavy street car.

Again, a few things I've seen happen with street cars in the past.

Later
Grady
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Mar 1, 2004
#10
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #10
94-95 5.0L V8, GT/Cobra,
4x9x14" Muffler, 2.5" Tubing, Rear Exit, 3.5" Tip 15638 $566.78

From Magnaflow's website. The mid-pipes are generaly 2.5 inches in diameter. I saw a dyno run on headers on a near stock mustang. I will see if I can find it.

But here is what I remember. The LT's with the bigger primaries gained HP in the upper RPM's, and the LT's with smaller primaries gained HP in the low-mid RPM's.

IMO, if you want your car to perform at the track or when racing, the you want the bigger primaries (1 & 3/4").
Scott
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Mar 2, 2004
#11
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #11
what else is needed for installation? im assuming that the headers will come with the gaskets needed should i use those or by my own? I am going to by new 02's will i need 02 extenders?
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Mar 2, 2004
#12
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #12
I would get some Fel-Pro 1415's for the exhaust gaskets. I got O2 extenders from Brothers. Also, get some header studs or Stage 8 locking header bolts.

Jake
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 2, 2004
#13
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #13
You can use the extenders.

I just extended the length of my car's harness.

I used 1415's for gaskets as those that were supplied with headers were too small.

A cheap and effective way to keep header bolts tight is thin stainless steel lock washers from a bolt & nut supply. Been doing it for years. Works great.

Later
Grady
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 2, 2004
#14
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #14
MAC LT's do have the EGR bung. BBK's didn't for a long time until like a year ago and I here those are scarce. I bought the O2 extenders from Brothers for $40 (it's plug and play). I also used the copper gaskets that came with the headers from MAC. Just wanted to try them out and I've had them on and off the car with zero problems.
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Mar 2, 2004
#15
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #15
thanks guys, im pretty sure ill have some questions when i get ready to install.
 

Killer95Stang

New Member
Aug 7, 2003
256
1
0
Covina, CA
Mar 2, 2004
#16
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #16
Here's a couple pics I took during my install of Ceramic Coated LT's, on GT40P heads...

Also, I recommend getting O2 extensions, because it just makes it easier...














 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Mar 2, 2004
#17
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #17
Killer, have you passed CA emissions with those headers? Do you just put a catted H on when you're about to go to DMV? I've heard of cars that don't come close to passing with LT's, thats why my shop doesn't mess with 'em.

Joe
 

Killer95Stang

New Member
Aug 7, 2003
256
1
0
Covina, CA
Mar 2, 2004
#18
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #18
I'm not even gonna bother trying to make it pass... I'm lucky enough to know a few shops in the LA area that will make sure it passes.... *wink* *wink*...
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
Fairfield, Ca
Mar 3, 2004
#19
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #19
Joes95GT said:
Killer, have you passed CA emissions with those headers? Do you just put a catted H on when you're about to go to DMV? I've heard of cars that don't come close to passing with LT's, thats why my shop doesn't mess with 'em.

Joe
Click to expand...
In CA exhaust shops cannot remove or relocate the cats. Nobody will touch them. i guess there is like a $10,000 fine if you do.
 

Killer95Stang

New Member
Aug 7, 2003
256
1
0
Covina, CA
Mar 3, 2004
#20
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #20
Actually, if you pass a car that is obviously not emissions legal, you lose your license, have a butt load of fines, and can get a 6month to 1 year jail sentence.... a lot of risk for a couple hundred bucks... life sucks here in CA... If I do decide to get legal with the car again, I figure I will just register it in AZ... because I'm not pulling those longtubes off, unless its with a cutting torch...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
368
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Friday at 7:26 AM
DadLife0724
N
WTB/Trade 1-3/4 Long tube or shorty headers for foxbody
  • nhlxpony
  • Jan 8, 2025
  • Exhaust Parts
Replies
4
Views
626
Exhaust Parts Jan 9, 2025
nhlxpony
N
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
431
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
964
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?