• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Long tubes or Tri-Y's

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z06killinSBF
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2009

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Dec 12, 2009
#1
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #1
I need to change my old, beat up and hammered on headers for my up coming AOD swap. I have always liked the Tri-Y's but they only come in 1-1/2 primary and 2-1/2 collector. I would prefer the ones with 1-5/8 w/ 3" collector but those are $500+. Would I notice a difference between the smaller Tri-Y's over bigger, conventional long tubes? My current headers are 1-1/2 primary w/3" collectors. What is recommended for a combo soon to make about 350hp on a $300 budget? I am trying to keep my scavenging to a max.

My exhaust will be 2-1/2 w/an x pipe with the round Magnaflow's out the back.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Dec 12, 2009
#2
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #2
IMO, you can't go wrong with a pair of long-tubes.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 12, 2009
#3
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #3
I've run both std tri-y's and Hedman long tubes (these are the std midsize Ford headers for Mavs, Stangs, etc) on my 331 and cannot tell the difference. The powerband ends at the same rpm level with both.........about 6500. The tri-ys would be fine with a 350 hp motor. My 331 puts out far more than that.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Dec 12, 2009
#4
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #4
If the AOD is a big bellhousing transmission with the larger flywheel then the Tri-Ys are not going to fit. They hug the tranny too closely and end up into the bellhousing. I think they only fit 157 toothed flywheel transmissions. If the AOD uses the smaller, older style, bellhousing then you should be fine.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Dec 13, 2009
#5
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #5
Running the bigger bell housing.... so LT's it is.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Dec 13, 2009
#6
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #6
I've run both, and I can tell you that tri-y's are so much easier to live with. They are easier to install and work around, they have much better ground clearance and I seriously doubt you'd see any horsepower loss on the street. My car is low, yet the headers don't drag, a buddy has a stock-height '66 coupe and long tubes, and his headers hang way below the subframe rail, so if the car were any lower, it would be a problem. As it is, they just loof goofy hanging down.
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Dec 13, 2009
#7
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #7
I picked up a pair of MAC longtubes and will be installing an AOD, however I haven't done a test fit on the motor/trans as a combo but plan to before I install. The MAC's were the only ones I found listed that would fit my PS car for a reasonalby amount ($150 plain-$350 ceramic). From pics I've seen they don't hang down either, I think they tuck like the hedmans but don't require the drop bracket for me, I see you have R&P so that's different.
Jon
 
6

68Jcode

Founding Member
Jan 28, 1999
106
0
16
Dec 14, 2009
#8
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #8
JonK - MACs & PS bracket

Jon,
You mention the MAC's don't require a PS drop bracket - I'm wondering where you got that info. I've been looking for a set to use w/o a drop bracket and if the MAC's really clear, I'll probably get a set. What part number are you running?

Thanks,

Andrew
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Dec 15, 2009
#9
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #9
Andrew, here's the part #'s, I picked up a pair of used unpainted off fleabay, had them blasted and painted them with VHT ceramic silver for ~$120 toether. I wish I would have bought a pair of newly ceramic coated for ~$350 as I see they've gone up in price.
http://www.macperformance.com/store/category.cfm?SID=3&Category_ID=347

I don't know why MAC doesn't advertise the PS clearance but other sites do:
Mustangs Unlimited - The Premier Source for Mustang, Shelby and Cougar Parts and Accessories
It used to say it on AMPperformance or a similar site but can't find the link right now.
Jon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
368
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Friday at 7:26 AM
DadLife0724
Engine Keeping O2 sensors lit with long tube headers
  • keel
  • Jul 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
118
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
AeroCoupe
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
92
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
261
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?