• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Looking for info on the 95 Cobra R

  • Thread starter Thread starter bayellowstang
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2005
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
May 13, 2005
#1
  • May 13, 2005
  • #1
What MAF did they use? What where the cam specs? What intake did it use?

I did not search on here for info, but i did other places. Thanks in advance.
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
May 14, 2005
#2
  • May 14, 2005
  • #2
ANYONE KNOW? I'll take links to anything about them.
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 14, 2005
#3
  • May 14, 2005
  • #3
It used the 5.8 Cobra Intake. I don't know about the MAF.
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 14, 2005
#4
  • May 14, 2005
  • #4
Try this Link
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 14, 2005
#5
  • May 14, 2005
  • #5
Here are all the specs.


The 1/4 mile time on this spec sheet is
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
May 14, 2005
#6
  • May 14, 2005
  • #6
qwick94GT said:
Here are all the specs.


The 1/4 mile time on this spec sheet is
Click to expand...


Thanks for the links but thats all the same stuff I have found. I was hoping for some detailed info on the cam and stuff. I'll keep looking though.
 

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
May 14, 2005
#7
  • May 14, 2005
  • #7
bayellowstang said:
What MAF did they use? What where the cam specs? What intake did it use?

I did not search on here for info, but i did other places. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

I believe the R used the same MAF sensor as the regular cobra, now, not 100% sure, but I think so, because the air intake, TB, Intake manifold, and cylinder heads were the same as the regular 5.0 cobra, but as far as cam, you got me.
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
May 14, 2005
#8
  • May 14, 2005
  • #8
What did the Cobra R's run anyways? I've heard they would run high 12's
 

dcarlson

Member
Apr 8, 2005
128
3
19
Long Island, NY
May 14, 2005
#9
  • May 14, 2005
  • #9
The cam was a flat tappet hydraulic, and it wasn't very good. Ford used it because it was already certified for emmisions and they figured racers would change them anyway.

When we were racing the '95 R in the IMSA Street Stock Endurance Series, Ford submitted the offical parts list to IMSA with a hydraulic roller. But that wasn't the cam that it rolled off the assembly line with.
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
May 14, 2005
#10
  • May 14, 2005
  • #10
dcarlson said:
The cam was a flat tappet hydraulic, and it wasn't very good. Ford used it because it was already certified for emmisions and they figured racers would change them anyway.

When we were racing the '95 R in the IMSA Street Stock Endurance Series, Ford submitted the offical parts list to IMSA with a hydraulic roller. But that wasn't the cam that it rolled off the assembly line with.
Click to expand...


I'm looking because I run the Cobra-R tune in my stang. I'm trying to find the cam specs to match up the injector timing to my cam.

My car runs far better with the Cobra-R tune then it does the normal cobra or the GT.


Thanks for all the info so far.
 
Q

qwick94GT

New Member
Nov 20, 2004
108
0
0
May 14, 2005
#11
  • May 14, 2005
  • #11
5.0_GT_kid said:
What did the Cobra R's run anyways? I've heard they would run high 12's
Click to expand...

With 300hp and 365 ft lb's I would say 12.8 to 13.3

That 14 second 1/4 is
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
May 14, 2005
#12
  • May 14, 2005
  • #12
qwick94GT said:
With 300hp and 365 ft lb's I would say 12.8 to 13.3

That 14 second 1/4 is
Click to expand...


That should be no problem. You see what I'm running with no traction. I figure if it hooks I could probably run a low 13.xxx.
 
J

jasonlee0704

New Member
Feb 3, 2004
219
0
0
Kansas City, MO
May 14, 2005
#13
  • May 14, 2005
  • #13
SVT used the Ford Racing M50 flat-tappet cam.

208 degree/224 degree intake/exhaust @ 0.050" of lift

0.453"/0.453" intake/exhaust lift

As you can tell, it's pretty conservative. Those would be mild specs for a 302, much less a 351W.

GT40 iron heads.

The 95 R had a different air intake. It uses a 96-2000 GT conical air filter, if you look up the replacement part at K&N.

I'm not sure about the MAF or the throttle body setup.

The radiator is an aluminum piece. You can buy one through Ford Racing; I don't know who the original manufacturer is.
 

dcarlson

Member
Apr 8, 2005
128
3
19
Long Island, NY
May 14, 2005
#14
  • May 14, 2005
  • #14
jasonlee0704 said:
The 95 R had a different air intake. It uses a 96-2000 GT conical air filter, if you look up the replacement part at K&N.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's right. I forgot about that. We sent the filter to K&N so they could make one for us. When the '96 Mustang came out a year later it turned out to be the same filter.


The radiator is not a direct bolt in. It takes different brackets and a degas bottle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Intro---Looking for info/parts
  • OTTRunner
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
59
The Welcome Wagon Jun 8, 2026
OTTRunner
O
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
859
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
M
Gt40p headers
  • Mike3
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
811
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 1, 2025
Blackhawkxx
Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
313
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
204
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?