• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

MIL Eliminators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steve491
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2009

Steve491

Member
Apr 20, 2008
254
2
19
Charlotte, NC
Apr 11, 2009
#1
  • Apr 11, 2009
  • #1
Question for you ECM experts out there. The way I understand it that MIL eliminators are installed on the downstream O2 sensors in order to "fool" the ECM into thinking the catalytic convertors are working correctly when in fact they have been removed. Here's my question. Do MIL eliminators completely replace the O2 sensor's signal or just modify the signal? In other words do you still have to have a functioning O2 sensor to complete the loop?
My car has been running great with the MIL eliminators for a long time but now the check engine light is on with a p0136 code, O2 bank 1 sensor 2. Hopefully it is just the O2 sensor and not something major with the ECM or wiring.

Also, I installed high flow cats in the X-pipe so is it even necessary to have the MIL eliminators?

Thanks, Steve
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Apr 11, 2009
#2
  • Apr 11, 2009
  • #2
Steve491 said:
Also, I installed high flow cats in the X-pipe so is it even necessary to have the MIL eliminators?

Thanks, Steve
Click to expand...

if the x pipe has bungs to fit the 02 sensors, MILs are not needed when cats are present. use the 02 sensors

if there are no bungs, you would need them either way. to fit the 02 sensors or the MILs. hopefully you have them
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Apr 11, 2009
#3
  • Apr 11, 2009
  • #3
Steve491 said:
Question for you ECM experts out there. The way I understand it that MIL eliminators are installed on the downstream O2 sensors in order to "fool" the ECM into thinking the catalytic convertors are working correctly when in fact they have been removed. Here's my question. Do MIL eliminators completely replace the O2 sensor's signal or just modify the signal? In other words do you still have to have a functioning O2 sensor to complete the loop?
Click to expand...

They just modify the signal. An eliminator is really nothing more than a low-pass filter. It's an RC (resistor-capacitor) filter in the signal line that heavily filters and thus smooths out the signal from the O2 sensor

My car has been running great with the MIL eliminators for a long time but now the check engine light is on with a p0136 code, O2 bank 1 sensor 2. Hopefully it is just the O2 sensor and not something major with the ECM or wiring.
Click to expand...

It could be a faulty MIL eliminator causing this or the sensor itself has died. I'd suspect it before anything original to the car itself.

Also, I installed high flow cats in the X-pipe so is it even necessary to have the MIL eliminators?
Click to expand...

It depends. High-flow cats don't generally do as good a job with HCs, NOx and CO as the more restrictive OE cats. As a result, a high-flow cat may result in the rear O2 sensor seeing more rich/lean transitions which the PCM might interpret as bad cats. If the cats are high quality pieces, you may not need the MIL-Es. If they put flow ahead of exhaust gas treatment, it's likely you will.

Try them without the MIL-Es first. If the efficiency code appears, you have your answer.
 

Steve491

Member
Apr 20, 2008
254
2
19
Charlotte, NC
Apr 12, 2009
#4
  • Apr 12, 2009
  • #4
Thanks Guys, I replaced the O2 sensor, left off the MIL eliminators, cleared the code and so far so good. We'll see after a few drives if the light stays off. If it doesn't then throw them back on.
 

AdRock

Member
Nov 13, 2003
521
1
19
South Texas
Apr 13, 2009
#5
  • Apr 13, 2009
  • #5
If you do put the MIL's back on there's one thing that could have been causing the CEL on that sensor.

When I first put the MIL's on my car everything was cool. No light. Ended up getting intermittent CEL's from the rear O2's after a while. I pulled the connectors apart on both sides of the MIL's, cleaned them with some contact cleaner, and put some dielectric grease in there. There was some moisture that got into the connector. The grease seals moisture out and I've never had another problem.

Just some food for thought if anyone else has a CEL with the MIL's installed.
 

Greenscobie86

Member
May 14, 2008
132
0
17
The Island NY
Apr 14, 2009
#6
  • Apr 14, 2009
  • #6
^^^ Good tip.. I will try that with my car. I'm having the exact problem you described...
 

Steve491

Member
Apr 20, 2008
254
2
19
Charlotte, NC
May 24, 2009
#7
  • May 24, 2009
  • #7
After doing more maintenance and a 2 week vacation in the Carribean the Cobra is back on the road in great shape. I changed the tx fluid, coolant, fuel filter (what a pain), steering rack, and the strut bearings (UPR CC plates). I wanted change out the muffler bearings and the winter air in the tires but there is just not enough time.
Seriously, back to the original post about the MIL eliminators. I was always under the impression that the rear O2 sensors had no input regarding fuel mixture/timing via the ECM. My Cobra runs so much cleaner and leaner since I got rid of the MILs....
-Steve-
 

AdRock

Member
Nov 13, 2003
521
1
19
South Texas
May 24, 2009
#8
  • May 24, 2009
  • #8
Steve491 said:
After doing more maintenance and a 2 week vacation in the Carribean the Cobra is back on the road in great shape. I changed the tx fluid, coolant, fuel filter (what a pain), steering rack, and the strut bearings (UPR CC plates). I wanted change out the muffler bearings and the winter air in the tires but there is just not enough time.
Seriously, back to the original post about the MIL eliminators. I was always under the impression that the rear O2 sensors had no input regarding fuel mixture/timing via the ECM. My Cobra runs so much cleaner and leaner since I got rid of the MILs....
-Steve-
Click to expand...

It's true, the rear O2's have no bearing on how the ECM does anything as far as tuning. They are there simply to show the ECM whether the cats are working properly or not. That's it. I'd guess that the difference in how the car feels could possibly be attributed to you changing the fuel filter.
 

Steve491

Member
Apr 20, 2008
254
2
19
Charlotte, NC
May 25, 2009
#9
  • May 25, 2009
  • #9
It's very possible that it was the fuel filter given how hard it is to change. It looked very old, maybe original. Hopefully I'll get yet another gain when I put my new plugs and wires on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
77
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
A
2020 Ford Mustang GT P0036, P0138, P0141 02 sensor help
  • AmkoA
  • Jul 29, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
287
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 5, 2025
skkrtis
S
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
709
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
A
Electrical New O2 sensor harness has no jumpers (91/93)…
  • afjLX
  • Dec 11, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
384
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2024
afjLX
A
L
2004 Mustang Oxygen (O2) Sensor Issue
  • letumeternum
  • Dec 30, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
854
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 24, 2025
letumeternum
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?