• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Mustang not muscle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter krash kendall
  • Start date Start date Mar 28, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Mar 28, 2007
#1
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #1
Although compared to the Camaro in this Top Ten Muscle Cars article, the Mustang just doesn't cut it I guess.
 
B

BB1966

New Member
Dec 1, 2004
297
1
0
Beaufort , NC USA!!!!
Mar 28, 2007
#2
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #2
Sounds VERY biased to me , hell the GM cars (GS,GTO,Chevelle) are all the same car! The Mustang started the Pony cars.........
 
D

dablack

New Member
May 17, 2005
39
0
0
Mar 28, 2007
#3
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #3
I'm fine w/ the list except that a camaro isn't a muscle car. Neither is a mustang. Both of those are pony cars. Muscle cars are mid sized cars w/ large motors (notice I didn't say big block....the only cars that came w/ big blocks are chebys). On that list, they should have removed the camaro and put in the torino.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Mar 28, 2007
#4
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #4
A SCJ or a GT500KR is more muscle than pony in my opinion.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 29, 2007
#5
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #5
krash kendall said:
A SCJ or a GT500KR is more muscle than pony in my opinion.
Click to expand...


it's still technically a pony car. this debate has existed since day one of the muscle car. that said, the larger cube pony cars are still muscle cars in my book. my opinion is that if it has a 350ci or larger engine it's a muscle car. most people consider the nova a muscle car and it's a compact car just like mustang, camaro, cuda, etc.
 

BDT 1967

Member
Jan 31, 2006
91
0
6
Wichita KS
Mar 29, 2007
#6
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #6
Personally i think that the big block mustangs and the mid block mustangs were all muscle cars. But thats just one mans opinion. On another note, i have lost a lot of respect for chevy in the past few years. Used to be, you knew it was muscle when it had an ss badge on it, SS 396 camaros, SS 396/454 chevelles, and some pretty bad novas. But any more you can go down to the chevy dealer and get a 4cly cobalt with Super Sport badges all over it. The name lost its meaning when they started pulling that BS Just another opinion
 
6

65mistress

Member
Aug 17, 2004
405
1
17
Generica USA
Mar 29, 2007
#7
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #7
The author of that article is just SLIGHTLY biased. He does mention the Mustang in the paragraphs about the other cars though, but still...
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 29, 2007
#8
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #8
BDT 1967 said:
Personally i think that the big block mustangs and the mid block mustangs were all muscle cars. But thats just one mans opinion. On another note, i have lost a lot of respect for chevy in the past few years. Used to be, you knew it was muscle when it had an ss badge on it, SS 396 camaros, SS 396/454 chevelles, and some pretty bad novas. But any more you can go down to the chevy dealer and get a 4cly cobalt with Super Sport badges all over it. The name lost its meaning when they started pulling that BS Just another opinion
Click to expand...



actualy it was possible to order most any six banger car with the SS trim package back in the day. i've seen original 6 cyl SS nova's and even a 67 impala SS with a six popper.
 

BDT 1967

Member
Jan 31, 2006
91
0
6
Wichita KS
Mar 29, 2007
#9
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #9
Hu?? I never knew that, I guess you just never see them any more, most people probably have swapped them out over the years. I guess you learn something new every day. My dad failed to mention that little bit of information during our years of car talk.
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Mar 29, 2007
#10
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #10
Yeah, there are 5 different cars in that article, the Camaro, the Fairlane, the Roadrunner/Charger, the Challenger/Barracuda and the GS/Chevelle/442/GTO.
 

RFMustangGT

Member
Apr 4, 2005
294
0
16
Knoxville,TN
Mar 29, 2007
#11
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #11
dablack said:
(notice I didn't say big block....the only cars that came w/ big blocks are chebys).
Click to expand...

huh? please explain. maybe I'm missing something but I could have swore that the FE block and the 385 series were big blocks and Ford did use them in pretty much anything.
 

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Mar 29, 2007
#12
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #12
1320stang said:
Yeah, there are 5 different cars in that article, the Camaro, the Fairlane, the Roadrunner/Charger, the Challenger/Barracuda and the GS/Chevelle/442/GTO.
Click to expand...

Your right on the money with that statement. Same friggin cars. Who the heck made up this list. So you mean when they feature a Mustang on Muscle Car or Horsepower TV, it's false?
 

RFMustangGT

Member
Apr 4, 2005
294
0
16
Knoxville,TN
Mar 29, 2007
#13
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #13
didn't that show Dream Car Garage have a muscle car shootout and they had a BOSS 429 in the line up? guess they were wrong too according to the article. I see early mustangs as more of sport cars but the 69 and 73 I think should be thrown into the mix of muscle cars.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 29, 2007
#14
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #14
thechnically speaking chevy is the only who has an actual "big block" designation ford uses FE and 385 series, buick and pontiac don't really use different block designs nor does oldsmobile. chrysler uses B and RB designations
 

BDT 1967

Member
Jan 31, 2006
91
0
6
Wichita KS
Mar 29, 2007
#15
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #15
RFMustangGT said:
didn't that show Dream Car Garage have a muscle car shootout and they had a BOSS 429 in the line up? guess they were wrong too according to the article. I see early mustangs as more of sport cars but the 69 and 73 I think should be thrown into the mix of muscle cars.
Click to expand...

I saw that show, If i remember correctly the boss 429 out performed them all.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Mar 29, 2007
#16
  • Mar 29, 2007
  • #16
Mustangs rule and they know it.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Mar 30, 2007
#17
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #17
BDT 1967 said:
i have lost a lot of respect for chevy in the past few years. Used to be, you knew it was muscle when it had an ss badge on it, SS 396 camaros, SS 396/454 chevelles, and some pretty bad novas. But any more you can go down to the chevy dealer and get a 4cly cobalt with Super Sport badges all over it. The name lost its meaning when they started pulling that BS Just another opinion
Click to expand...

Let's not forget the '80's cars. My auto V6 Mustang took my roommate's 305 Camaro, the same engine used in some SS Monte's. lol

1320stang said:
Yeah, there are 5 different cars in that article, the Camaro, the Fairlane, the Roadrunner/Charger, the Challenger/Barracuda and the GS/Chevelle/442/GTO.
Click to expand...

I disagree. It's the engine that made the car a Muscle car, and all those cars have different engines or engine packages. You couldn't get a 454 in a GS, just like you couldn't get a six pack in a Roadrunner.
Also the Roadrunner was a stripper car, while the Charger was more luxurious.

You all are complaining about an article that measures engines in "litres" and couldn't mention the Dodge Charger without a friggin Dukes of Hazard reference.

Look on the Bright side, the Nova, Rambler, AMX, Super Bee, El Camino, and 63.5 Galaxie guys are all probably as angry with that article as Mustang owners are.
 

splinterddt

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2000
201
0
16
Florence, CO, U.S.A.
Apr 2, 2007
#18
  • Apr 2, 2007
  • #18
The Camaro and Mustang were Pony cars. A couple models could be considered Muscle cars. So they accept Camaro and exclude Mustang, it's obvious there's some bias. What about Mustang's cousin---> Shelby Cobra 427 s/c? Arguably the baddest muscle car ever built. Oh yes, I said "Muscle Car!"
 
B

BADBOSS

New Member
Jan 3, 2006
29
0
0
EVERETT WASHINGTON
Apr 3, 2007
#19
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #19
the guy that wrote that article, Henry Biggs, is an idiot, and needs to learn how to do some REAL research on the topic....engage brain before trying to think...

 

Attachments

  • DSCN0284.webp
    12.8 KB · Views: 177

splinterddt

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2000
201
0
16
Florence, CO, U.S.A.
Apr 6, 2007
#20
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #20
Even without opening a book, almost every muscle car book features Mustangs.
 

Attachments

  • mc1.webp
    2.6 KB · Views: 190
  • mc2.webp
    2.2 KB · Views: 197
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Install 79-93 Mustang Heater Core Replacement
  • AeroCoupe
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • Resource Discussion Forum
Replies
3
Views
339
Resource Discussion Forum Oct 17, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Suspension Is somethig Wrong Here?
  • Icemanxxxv
  • Jul 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
95
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Hello all, I am new to this forum
  • Maddog 302
  • Dec 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
222
The Welcome Wagon Dec 20, 2025
nickyb
R
Front suspension upgrade going on one of our 64/5-68 Mustangs
  • Restomotive
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
121
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
Restomotive
R
J
Mustang 1968 coupé restoration hvac
  • JackStang68
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
140
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2026
zookeeper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?