• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Mustang Vs. Camaro Vs. Trans Am- 1985

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikestang63
  • Start date Start date Sep 4, 2014

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 4, 2014
#1
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #1
Nice video of Motorweek comparing the three NEW muscle cars from 1985.. I remember this episode. Check out the price of the Mustang $10K!!!! This is what spawned the modern muscle car era. Low 14's off the showroom floor. I forgot all about the bad mustaches and clothes we wore back then!

 

doobismaximus

Member
Jul 18, 2014
72
4
8
Anywhere usa
Sep 4, 2014
#2
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #2
That was a great video! Mustache City!!!
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Sep 4, 2014
#3
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #3
I think I'm going to grow my handlebar stache' back out and sport my trucker hat to represent!
 
Reactions: 5.0notslow

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Sep 4, 2014
#4
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #4
I remember those days! Had the hat, the mustache, the mullet, and the Camaro. Well briefly on the Camaro. LOL
It was slooooow! I'm proud to say that I was there when the 5.0 craze started.

Yeah I'm old.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

5.0notslow

Member
Apr 26, 2008
201
7
18
Enterprise AL
Sep 4, 2014
#5
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #5
Sweet video. Lol
 

5.0notslow

Member
Apr 26, 2008
201
7
18
Enterprise AL
Sep 4, 2014
#6
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #6
The video is older than me...
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,114
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 4, 2014
#7
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #7
"Hey it's the 80's! Ever hear of fuel injection???"
 
Reactions: 5.0notslow

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,114
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 4, 2014
#8
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #8
LOL... Our suspensions sucked even when we were new. hahaha
 
Reactions: 90lxwhite

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Sep 4, 2014
#9
  • Sep 4, 2014
  • #9
Onefine88 said:
I remember those days! Had the hat, the mustache, the mullet, and the Camaro. Well briefly on the Camaro. LOL
It was slooooow! I'm proud to say that I was there when the 5.0 craze started.

Yeah I'm old.
Click to expand...
I had the mullet,the CAMARO(again briefly),and I couldn't grow the 'stache(graduated h.s in '89 to young lol). Bought a brand new 90 CAMARO rs that lasted 4 months and then bought my first 89' Mustang LX 5.0-5speed used with 15000 miles on it. The rest was history(except another brief run with a 01 CAMARO SS-I hated the 96-00 mustangs)
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Sep 5, 2014
#10
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #10
LOL, It took me two Camaro's to learn that the Mustang was better. I bought a brand new '82 Camaro sport coupe with 305 4 speed. 3 years later I traded it for an '85 Z28 305 automatic thinking it would be faster. Wrong! The '82 was quicker with the stick. Ha-ha.

That video was spot on when it came to performance. I had two friends with Mustangs. Both of my Camaro's would out handle my buddy's Mustangs hands down.
But, when it came to straight line head to head races "and there were alot of them" I would lose every time to the Mustangs.
The Mustangs were simply more fun because of the lack of grip and handling. (And still are)

Finally ,'88 came around and I couldn't stand it any longer. I bought my new '88vert. For awhile there I had the baddest car in my little peer group. LOL
 
Reactions: A5literMan

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Sep 5, 2014
#11
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #11
Way cool. Did you see this one? It's more my generation. Oh and as for the "as tested" price for these I don't remember seeing em that cheap on the showroom floor.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd1WF3fx9ys
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Sep 5, 2014
#12
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #12
90lxwhite said:
Way cool. Did you see this one? It's more my generation. Oh and as for the "as tested" price for these I don't remember seeing em that cheap on the showroom floor.
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd1WF3fx9ys
Click to expand...
My 01 ran 13.5 right off the showroom floor. Stock mustangs couldn't touch that. Borrowed some sticky tires and the car actually made a 13.00's pass(multiple 13.10's) I actually really liked that car. Got rid of it when I got divorced and got back into foxes(literally and figuratively lol)
 
Reactions: 90lxwhite

5.0notslow

Member
Apr 26, 2008
201
7
18
Enterprise AL
Sep 5, 2014
#13
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #13
A5literMan said:
Got rid of it when I got divorced and got back into foxes(literally and figuratively lol)
Click to expand...

Hheeyyoo!
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 5, 2014
#14
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #14
I had an acquaintance in high school who got a 13.2 out of a stock 92' Mustang. It was an LX he box check ordered with a bunch of deletes and a 3.72 gear.

Kurt
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 5, 2014
#15
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #15
I would also like to add that I was very young at that time, and don't have to admit to having an embarrassing dick broom.

Kurt
 

87_LX_5.0

Active Member
Aug 24, 2010
142
23
29
Uniontown, PA
Sep 5, 2014
#16
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #16
$10,200? I'll take three please.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,114
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 5, 2014
#17
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #17
...and then there was nothing to be excited about until the 03 Cobra.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 5, 2014
#18
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #18
revhead347 said:
I would also like to add that I was very young at that time, and don't have to admit to having an embarrassing dick broom.

Kurt
Click to expand...
WTF? 'dick broom' ?

Do I even want to know?

My stock 85 went 14.5 off the showroom floor. Threw some donut spares on the front, ran a short belt. iced the intake, bumped the timing, removed everything from the back- tire. jack. etc., played with launch rpm and got it down to 13.82 within a month. In 87, my 87 vert went 15.2 with 150 miles on it. Removed the air silencer and did most of the things that later made it to Bob Cosby's list and got it down to mid 14's before I started with bolt on's. Back then there was no aftermarket for these cars and Ford was the only place to get very limited speed parts. There wasn't even an aftermarket cam, intake, or headers developed yet. We opened up the stock TB and intake. Guys were ripping off their EFI because running carbs were faster and no one knew how to tune them yet. About the only thing you could do was gears, cat back exhaust, a "ram air" from March, and a set of slicks for a year or two. Getting one of these cars into the 12's made you the fastest guy on the block.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

jetmech807

10 Year Member
Dec 1, 2011
1,195
326
164
Crestview, FL
Sep 5, 2014
#19
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #19
I was to busy playing with Oldsmobile's to be bothered with any of those. Actually I got my first Cutlass in 86 when I turned 15. It's a lot of fun driving an old GM A body that would stomp the guts out of an IROC.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 5, 2014
#20
  • Sep 5, 2014
  • #20
mikestang63 said:
WTF? 'dick broom' ?

Do I even want to know?

My stock 85 went 14.5 off the showroom floor. Threw some donut spares on the front, ran a short belt. iced the intake, bumped the timing, removed everything from the back- tire. jack. etc., played with launch rpm and got it down to 13.82 within a month. In 87, my 87 vert went 15.2 with 150 miles on it. Removed the air silencer and did most of the things that later made it to Bob Cosby's list and got it down to mid 14's before I started with bolt on's. Back then there was no aftermarket for these cars and Ford was the only place to get very limited speed parts. There wasn't even an aftermarket cam, intake, or headers developed yet. We opened up the stock TB and intake. Guys were ripping off their EFI because running carbs were faster and no one knew how to tune them yet. About the only thing you could do was gears, cat back exhaust, a "ram air" from March, and a set of slicks for a year or two. Getting one of these cars into the 12's made you the fastest guy on the block.
Click to expand...

I can identify with everything you said. "Dick Broom" is in the thesaurus. Just search "Mustache."

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
M
  • Locked
SOLD 2011 Mustang Gt Premium - Manual - Glass Roof - Brembos - Nav - 44k - $25k (raleigh, Nc)
  • mec011
  • Apr 29, 2015
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
4K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Apr 29, 2015
mec011
M
How A Ford Mustang Topped The Empire State Building
  • MRaburn
  • Sep 14, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
1K
StangNet Site News Sep 14, 2013
MRaburn
Vaughn Gittin Jr and the 845hp 2014 Ford Mustang RTR
  • MRaburn
  • Apr 3, 2013
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
1
Views
2K
StangNet Site News Apr 3, 2013
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?