• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

My age old problem...SOLVED Please Read!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Synned
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned
Mar 31, 2005
991
1
0
Philly
Jul 29, 2006
#41
  • Jul 29, 2006
  • #41
HISSIN50 said:
This is where the differences in 94-95's and Aero foxes comes into play.

The 94-95 processor is load based, and to try to make the car run cleaner, there's too much timing and too little fuel.

A quick and dirty way to try to enrichen things is to do the IAT tricking. Sure it aint correct to do, but it can help. A 180* t-stat isn't factory correct, but it can make for a nice compromise..... this is the same kinda thing in my mind (When temps cool off, Joe will hook his IAT harness back up to the IAT I bet).

Joe, I'm glad to see you checked the resistance values for the thermistor - my recollection had been that there was a ton of resistance in some of the readings (the curve is parabolic as I recall).

Anyhow......... Enjoy!
Click to expand...

Exactly. I'm just glad I'll be able to go to the track during the summer without worrying about the car running like a dog.
As soon as summer ends, the IAT will be back operating.


Thanks to everyone who has helped!
Joe
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jul 30, 2006
#42
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #42
795.0pacecar said:
Shouldn't the computer know the actual air temp going into the engine? This seems like something that wouldn't work well in all conditions, or else ford would have done this from the beginning. BTW what does a 33k and 10k translate to temp wise for the ACT?
Click to expand...

Pin 25 ACT signal in. at 50 degrees F it should be 3.5 volts. It is a good number if the ACT is mounted in the inlet airbox. If it is mounted in the lower intake manifold, the voltage readings will be lower because of the heat transfer.

Pin 7 ECT signal in. at 176 degrees F it should be .80 volts

The ACT & ECT have the same thermistor, so the table values are the same.

Here's the table: The values are +/- 15%, so don't get worried if your readings vary a little bit.

Voltages are measured across the two connector pins of the sensor with the sensor connected.
68 degrees F = 3.02 v
86 degrees F = 2.62 v
104 degrees F = 2.16 v
122 degrees F = 1.72 v
140 degrees F = 1.35 v
158 degrees F = 1.04 v
176 degrees F = .80 v
194 degrees F = .61

Ohms measures at the computer with the computer disconnected, or at the sensor with the sensor disconnected.
50 degrees F = 58.75 K ohms
68 degrees F = 37.30 K ohms
86 degrees F = 27.27 K ohms
104 degrees F = 16.15 K ohms
122 degrees F = 10.97 K ohms
140 degrees F = 7.60 K ohms
158 degrees F = 5.37 K ohms
176 degrees F = 3.84 K ohms
194 degrees F = 2.80 K ohms
 

pb_paulie_b

Founding Member
May 19, 2001
894
0
0
Chaptico, Maryland
Jul 30, 2006
#43
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #43
Congrats! I love reading tech threads that end like this
 
S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned
Mar 31, 2005
991
1
0
Philly
Jul 30, 2006
#44
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #44
You think you're happy

I have noticed the car was running a little warm today, dunno if it was related or not.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jul 30, 2006
#45
  • Jul 30, 2006
  • #45
I was having the same problem, but I may have fixed it. I found that an ignition power wire that goes to the EEC relay was dissconected. I traced the wire to be what powers most of those sensors.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
98 Mustang GT dying
  • ItsMason
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
70
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 16, 2026
roblabsn95
R
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
138
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
213
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Need help asap
  • shaggyman65
  • Dec 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
242
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2025
shaggyman65
S
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
479
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?