• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

my friends 88gt beat me :mad: + exaust Q.

  • Thread starter Thread starter THX 138
  • Start date Start date May 15, 2007
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
Los Angeles
May 15, 2007
#1
  • May 15, 2007
  • #1
Tons of bolt ons on it we did on the 88. Full 2.5" off road H pipe exaust, hooker aerochambers, trick flow long runner intake, edelbrock shorty headers, ac removed, al. driveshaft, tb, cold air on a stock 302.

mine ''67 coupe with '69 308, performer intake and edelbrock carb, cam, but the stock exaust. I think the exaust killed me. I got a set of patriot shorty cermanic coated headers but I dunno what to do with the rest of the system. is there anything that bolts to the shorty/midlengths i got? the flowmaster and maganflow kits are for long tubes.

thanks
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
May 15, 2007
#2
  • May 15, 2007
  • #2
GT40 heads or AFR 165 and custom exhaust FTW.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
May 15, 2007
#3
  • May 15, 2007
  • #3
I think there might be a company that makes somthing to bolt up to shorties, but full lengths would probably help more along with a 2 1/2" exhaust..Put some 3.55;s or 3.80s in your car too.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
May 15, 2007
#4
  • May 15, 2007
  • #4
You were driving the wrong car, but seriously a standard performer intake and ede carb, while good pieces, are not a big step from stock. You did not say which cam you have but if it is the performer plus, I would not expect much more than mid 14's. I think it is just too mild of a combo.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 15, 2007
#5
  • May 15, 2007
  • #5
If you want to win races, you need to start buying performance parts.

He probably has your butt kicked in gearing too.
 
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
Los Angeles
May 15, 2007
#6
  • May 15, 2007
  • #6
he hasn't done gears and mine use to have just the 2 barrel. There's a LOT of things i would have done different with it, but live and learn is all i can say The cam i think was comp cams the guy recomended to go with the intake.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
May 15, 2007
#7
  • May 15, 2007
  • #7
He's also got a 5 speed. You have a... 3 speed auto? My guess is that you're going to need more than just exhaust to beat him.
 
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
Los Angeles
May 15, 2007
#8
  • May 15, 2007
  • #8
BottleFed70 said:
He's also got a 5 speed. You have a... 3 speed auto? My guess is that you're going to need more than just exhaust to beat him.
Click to expand...

ya. i got the 3 speed auto. he has tremec tko 5 speed. I was about to buy a t56 for it before I found the Saleen.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 15, 2007
#9
  • May 15, 2007
  • #9
Let's see: 88GT with a 225 horse rated 302, 5 speed trans, and what? 3.25 or so gears? Some MILD bolt on(all that stuff you listed probably added 30 horses) parts, a better suspension, posi traction. That vs a stock 67 Stang with a 4 bbl carb added (the Performer intake added nothing to it, it's an aluminum version of the stock 2bbl intake) on a stock 302, a C-4 trans? And a 2.79 geared pegleg rear? And you REALLY expected to win? Got a lot to learn my son.
 

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
May 15, 2007
#10
  • May 15, 2007
  • #10
easy on him there hearne! We are here to learn!

but yeah, even with more power it would take more to get it to stick to the ground and move the car forward. We are at a decent disadvantage to the newer guys in weight and suspension technology.
 
3

351carlo

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
267
0
0
Philadelphia
May 16, 2007
#11
  • May 16, 2007
  • #11
The ratio on his 5 speed means he might as well have had some 4.10s in the back compared to you.

You never stood a chance against that car. I bet it wasn't even close, and if it was, he can't drive. I would assume you're putting 190 to the rear wheels, probably lower. The stock formed 302 just isn't a great performer.

I've got long tubes, and bought the jegs full 2.5'' kit a while back. It was easy, almost fit, and cost next to nothing with the mufflers. I had about 320 in the entire exhaust setup including some long tube Hooker Comps and that was for my 351c.

If you want to spend money on your car, get a 3.55 rear (anything but an open), get some good exhaust and a decent intake. You'll be surprised. After that, a converter, shift kit, and hopefully you already have pertronix or some distributor setup. With that you stand a chance of keeping up. You'll probably need long tubes, some better than stock heads, a bigger cam and a nice HOLLEY to beat him.

Sorry.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 16, 2007
#12
  • May 16, 2007
  • #12
Really want a chance? Start with heads and the rear gear ratio. Skip all the crap he added to that 88GT. None of it really does anything to a stock motor. His bottle neck is his heads.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 16, 2007
#13
  • May 16, 2007
  • #13
Agreed.
 

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
May 16, 2007
#14
  • May 16, 2007
  • #14
D.Hearne said:
Really want a chance? Start with heads and the rear gear ratio. Skip all the crap he added to that 88GT. None of it really does anything to a stock motor. His bottle neck is his heads.
Click to expand...

+1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
932
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Stangnet Newbie: Horsepower/torque Estimate For My 1983 Gt
  • EBW83
  • Jan 19, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2018
stanglx2002
The Towering Inferno (the 1970 Mach 1 Version)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2016
smokin joe
Cam Recommendation For My Street Setup
  • all1knew
  • Jul 11, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
973
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2012
reldla1996
R
K
Newb! From Mass
  • Kenny Kline
  • Jul 1, 2012
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
690
The Welcome Wagon Jul 1, 2012
Kenny Kline
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?