• Mustang Forums
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk

My Personal Pics From Pri 2015 Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter 84Ttop
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jan 14, 2014
#21
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #21
I'm already looking to get my hands on one as soon as they hit the market... Just saying
 
1

1957 Fiesta

New Member
Apr 9, 2014
3
0
2
Apr 9, 2014
#22
  • Apr 9, 2014
  • #22
Route666 said:
They did say the weight would be saved "across the board" which I would have thought meant all models but I agree it doesn't look like weight was saved. It will be interesting to see if weight was saved, and how much lighter the turbo is than the 5.0. I'm a little (note: little) disappointed about the size, I would have loved a smaller and lighter car, might even be more keen on the turbo 4. Heck if it were up to me, the car would be a foot shorter, 6 inches skinnier, 2 inches lower using 17 and 18 inch wheels (not these 19 and 20 inch monstrosities they need to use now) with all components scaled down for the smaller and lighter car. It would be using a 1.8L turbo 4 base (~250HP) and a 3.8L V8 (~340HP) as GT with an intercooled (single or twin)-turbo V8 as the ultra (GT350 / 500 / etc) model. (Oh dreams...)
Click to expand...
Sounds like you are describing a rear wheel drive Focus ST I would love to see a car like that too. I bought a Focus ST for a DD and now that I found out about the EcoBoost Mustang I am getting one as a summer fun car because I miss rear wheel drive.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 9, 2014
#23
  • Apr 9, 2014
  • #23
I'm not bothered at all by the size and weight of the car. Heck, it's only 150lbs heavier than the SN95...and look how many more options you get and how much more solidly built the car is. And I'll take the longer and wider wheelbase and more rigid chassis over the choppy ride of a shorter, springier wheelbase any day.

Yeah, chopping the size and weight and removing all of the options would make it quicker and more nimble, but IMO an over all less fun car to drive. You aren't always going to be pushing this thing hard into corners and from light to light. In fact, 90% of the time, you're just going to be in it enjoying the driving experience.....so why not actually enjoy it?

My Fox is all of those things that many here wish the new GT was and although it's fun when pushed and in comparison to what was available "back in the day" it's pretty decently set up....it's barely entry level by today's standards.

If owning a VASTLY better car means I have to sacrifice 2/10 in a quarter of a mile, or 0.3G's on the skidpad (even though the numbers still blow the doors off of any Mustang prior to it), then so be it. The trade off is well worth it!
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Apr 11, 2014
#24
  • Apr 11, 2014
  • #24
Never said I wouldn't be cutting one up when I get my hands on it...
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Apr 11, 2014
#25
  • Apr 11, 2014
  • #25
Gearbanger 101 said:
I'm not bothered at all by the size and weight of the car. Heck, it's only 150lbs heavier than the SN95...and look how many more options you get and how much more solidly built the car is. And I'll take the longer and wider wheelbase and more rigid chassis over the choppy ride of a shorter, springier wheelbase any day.

Yeah, chopping the size and weight and removing all of the options would make it quicker and more nimble, but IMO an over all less fun car to drive. You aren't always going to be pushing this thing hard into corners and from light to light. In fact, 90% of the time, you're just going to be in it enjoying the driving experience.....so why not actually enjoy it?

My Fox is all of those things that many here wish the new GT was and although it's fun when pushed and in comparison to what was available "back in the day" it's pretty decently set up....it's barely entry level by today's standards.

If owning a VASTLY better car means I have to sacrifice 2/10 in a quarter of a mile, or 0.3G's on the skidpad (even though the numbers still blow the doors off of any Mustang prior to it), then so be it. The trade off is well worth it!
Click to expand...

Oh yes, this is how I see past it being a little big / heavy for a truly monsterous sports car. In fact this is the same thinking that makes me think the turbo 4 makes SO much more sense than the V8. 90% of the time, I'm not going to notice a difference in the drive, except a little more fuel use from the V8. Plus the extra registration costs of the V8 over the turbo 4, plus the extra initial cost of the V8... and the fact that they look almost identical (and in fact I like the cleaner look of the 4 over the 8 - no badges on the side, no hood vents). But it would still be a hard decision lol.

I do think it could have been a little smaller though, for practicality reasons, as on paper it is almost exactly the same size as my 4-door large family sedan (2002 Ford (Australia) Falcon).
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
137
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
312
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
N
Dyno Issue with 2015 GT
  • Nickos.Ford
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
144
The Welcome Wagon Jul 11, 2025
Nickos.Ford
N
Hello Mustang community!
  • MKatzenbach
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
222
The Welcome Wagon Mar 14, 2026
MKatzenbach
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?