• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Need some basic direction: c4 vs. T5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stang66swt
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2009

Stang66swt

New Member
Jan 8, 2009
5
0
0
Texas
Jan 15, 2009
#1
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • #1
My '65 vert has a manual 3-speed and I've seen a lot on c4 and T5 stuff. I want to keep the car a stick. I like the idea of an overdrive for longer trips but I get the feeling a C4 might be an easier, less involved, cheaper, and strong option. I'm just getting started so I'm turning to y'all for my first step.

Any info, opinions, facts, criticism will help.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jan 15, 2009
#2
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • #2
I would strongly recommend the t5 . . . I took my c4 out when I decided I wanted more of a cruiser and I actually wanted to keep up with traffic on the highway.
 
N

Nosboss

New Member
Dec 17, 2007
115
0
0
Jan 15, 2009
#3
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • #3
57fairlane said:
I would strongly recommend the t5 . . . I took my c4 out when I decided I wanted more of a cruiser and I actually wanted to keep up with traffic on the highway.
Click to expand...

I agree. I am in the process of doing the T5 swap right now. You will love the overdrive once you have it.
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Jan 15, 2009
#4
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • #4
you can get away with alot of rear gear on the street with that t5's overdrive. the c4 is good to just pop in drive and go, or if you have a hardcore street/strip car. if its a street driver, t5 all the way. only downside is the low torque handling in stock form
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 15, 2009
#5
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • #5
it depends on what rear gear you want to use. if you go with something in the 2.80-3.25 range, then i say go with the C4, for more rear gear than that you want the T5.
 
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
Jan 16, 2009
#6
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #6
If you have 3 speed stick, going to c4 does not make much sense unless you want autoomatic for some reason. Going to t5 will give you smoother acceleration because t5's 1st gear is numerically higher than 3-sp's 1st. Rear gearing 1:3.00 or less, combined with somewhat sporty camshaft (stock too), will cause you won't have enough rpm/torque for 5th until around 90-100 mph
 

Stang66swt

New Member
Jan 8, 2009
5
0
0
Texas
Jan 16, 2009
#7
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #7
isn't there a 4-speed manual tranny?
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jan 16, 2009
#8
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #8
Stang66swt said:
isn't there a 4-speed manual tranny?
Click to expand...

there are a couple.

4 speed toploader (more common in later stangs)
4 speed t-10 (more common in early stangs 65ish)
4 speed srod (late 70's overdrive piece o' crap)
 

Stang66swt

New Member
Jan 8, 2009
5
0
0
Texas
Jan 16, 2009
#9
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #9
rhyno9 said:
there are a couple.

4 speed toploader (more common in later stangs)
4 speed t-10 (more common in early stangs 65ish)
4 speed srod (late 70's overdrive piece o' crap)
Click to expand...

Ok, then these are what I should be asking about compared to the T5. No doubt the T5 is a solid replacement and everyone likes it but does it cost more and involve more to do the T5 over a 4 speed toploader
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jan 16, 2009
#10
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #10
any of the transmissions I mentioned will be easier than a t5.

The t5 swap requires some custom parts which will either $ or fabricate.

The 4 speeds will bolt up and use the existing linkage. I don't have experience with 3 speeds so I can't say for sure that the driveshaft will bolt up.

To swap a t5 you either need an adapter plate (early linkage and bell) or late model bell clutch and cable. You will need a crossmember with either setup.

I went from a t10 to a t5 and needed to have my driveshaft shortened. I used a late model bellhousing, clutch and cable. I fabbed the shifter, cable quadrant and crossmember myself.

as for the money

I have about $1200 into my swap.
$450 tranny and hurst shifter
$200 king cobra clutch(new)
$140 billet flywheel(new)
$25 bellhousing
$10 blockplate
$30 adjustable clutch cable(new)
$192 shorten driveshaft and new hd u-joints

The steel I used was scrap so I have no idea what that cost and many of these parts were purchased 5+ years ago.

Smallblock 4 speed toploaders on ebay go from $500 to $1100 so I am not sure the cost differential is that dramatic. It just depends at how patience you are at sourcing parts.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 16, 2009
#11
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #11
A good Toploader alone will very likely cost more than a good T5 and it has no overdrive. Your cruising rpm with the current Toploader 3 speed will be the exact same as with a Toploader 4 speed. The only difference will be another gear in the middle, which does help drivability. A C4 will be the same way. As an example, I have a Toploader 4 with 3.50 gears and 26" tires and my cruise rpm at 60mph is around 3000. I plan on getting either a WC T5 or Tremec 3550(used) in the future.
 

Edster

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2000
500
1
19
League City, Texas
Jan 17, 2009
#12
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #12
The toploader will take almost anything you can throw at it. It is as bulletproof as any factory item gets. You will spend way more on a 5spd that can handle high levels of torque. A c-4 can be built to handle gobs of torque. Gear vendors makes an overdrive that bolts on, but you will have to shorten your drive shaft and the unit cost$$$$.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 17, 2009
#13
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #13
If the car in question is the '65 convertible Stang66swt mentioned in the Talk forum, then it really doesn't need Toploader strength unless it's destined to be a drag car. Also, since it is a convertible, you would do well to not make any irreversible modifications to it.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jan 18, 2009
#14
  • Jan 18, 2009
  • #14
65ShelbyClone said:
A good Toploader alone will very likely cost more than a good T5 and it has no overdrive.
Click to expand...

no kidding . . .

I am looking for a toploader to face-plate for a race car and junk cores are $400+

t5s (especially the 4 cylinder ones) are a dime a dozen and you can buy a working one for $400.

I had $800-900 in my swap but I built almost everything myself, worked at a mustang shop (discounted parts) and my falcon driveshaft didn't need to be shortened.
 

Stang66swt

New Member
Jan 8, 2009
5
0
0
Texas
Jan 19, 2009
#15
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #15
65ShelbyClone said:
If the car in question is the '65 convertible Stang66swt mentioned in the Talk forum, then it really doesn't need Toploader strength unless it's destined to be a drag car. Also, since it is a convertible, you would do well to not make any irreversible modifications to it.
Click to expand...

So the T5 wouldn't really be a perminent mod?
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jan 19, 2009
#16
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #16
Stang66swt said:
So the T5 wouldn't really be a perminent mod?
Click to expand...

Not if you use the manual bellcrank linkage and spacer plate. The only thing you might need to change would be drilling a hole for the clucth linkage in the firewall. I am not sure if the hole was pre drilled at the factory on auto cars. Either hydraulic or cable would require additional holes to be drilled in the firewall. There might be one cable setup (Ron Morris) that uses the original bellcrank hole but I can't remember.

On a driver quality car I think a manual tranny swap won't affect the car's value either way.
 

Stang66swt

New Member
Jan 8, 2009
5
0
0
Texas
Jan 19, 2009
#17
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #17
rhyno9 said:
Not if you use the manual bellcrank linkage and spacer plate. The only thing you might need to change would be drilling a hole for the clucth linkage in the firewall. I am not sure if the hole was pre drilled at the factory on auto cars. Either hydraulic or cable would require additional holes to be drilled in the firewall. There might be one cable setup (Ron Morris) that uses the original bellcrank hole but I can't remember.

On a driver quality car I think a manual tranny swap won't affect the car's value either way.
Click to expand...

Good info. I definately want to keep the car a manual tranny.
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jan 19, 2009
#18
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #18
Stang66swt said:
Good info. I definately want to keep the car a manual tranny.
Click to expand...


I forgot you had a 3 speed. I kept thinking you had a c4 from the subject title.

One thing you would need to modify if using spacer plate and bellcrank is the bellhousing. You need to drill some holes in the bell to attach the spacer.

Driveshaft shortening seems be sporadic among conversions. My 67 had a t10 swapped into it at some point in time and it had a solid driveshaft with an 8 inch rear. When I put the drivetrain into my 68 using a 9 inch and t5 the driveshaft needed to be shortened. It could have been the rear or the tranny or both having caused this.
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Jan 19, 2009
#19
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #19
I'd have to go for the 5-speed, if for no other reason than because it's overdrive. I'm not one for modernizing these cars too much, bit I am an overdrive fan because of the flexibility it affords you in balancing driveability and mileage. I'm thinking about an AOD swap for my current C4.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 19, 2009
#20
  • Jan 19, 2009
  • #20
rhyno9 said:
I am not sure if the hole was pre drilled at the factory on auto cars. Either hydraulic or cable would require additional holes to be drilled in the firewall.
Click to expand...

Doesn't really matter in this discussion, but my '68 was a factory C4 car and it had a knock-out in the firewall like an electrical box.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
573
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
Progress Thread Dirty Water Racing 89 Notch Project
  • ShedBuiltMS
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2021
Flyboy60
F
The "Extra Engine" Post....hmmm
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2020
Wayne Waldrep
Electrical Aod-t5, Speed Density To Mass Air, 02 Harness Differences, Etc
  • Mustang5L5
  • Aug 23, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2016
larrym1961
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?