• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Need suggestion for rear end replacement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Credzba
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2006
C

Credzba

Member
Jul 11, 2004
37
0
6
Jan 3, 2006
#1
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #1
Got my 66 mustang working with new engine.
I put in a 347 stroker that makes 400hp at 5500 rpm at the flywheel.
It still has the stock 3 speed transmission, and stock 8 inch rear end.

I'd like to replace the rear end next with a limited slip type of rear end.
I know there are multiple types of rear end that provide a limited slip type of capability, some with clutches, and some without.

I intend to replace the 3 speed with a 4 speed toploader after the rear end is done, but that may be a year or 2.

So, What do you guys recommend manufacturer wise and what gear ratio do you recommend.
Can I get a donor from a later year model easily at the junk yard, and if so what should I look for?

I use it mostly for street use to show off for my friends, and to impress my wife so it wont see hard core racing (except when my sons drive it outside of my earshot).
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jan 3, 2006
#2
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #2
there is a company called MAE Racing that rebuilds and sells all types of rearends. They have a store on ebay, probably have a regular website too. I'd go for a rebuilt stock differential with a Ford trac-lok and whatever gears you want. A lot of people push home brewed 'posi' setups, stick with real ford stuff though. The trac-lok is a limited slip that uses clutches and is rebuildable (unlike the Auburn).

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FORD...026229527QQcategoryZ33731QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jan 3, 2006
#3
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #3
The rearend (67-up 8") referenced by 302 Coupe is the minimum you should consider. I don't think that they would recommend that rear for a 400hp 347, however. The '67-up 8" is better than the earlier 8" rears, but not really up to the task of handling your motor if any spirited driving is done. I have heard a rating of 350hp for this rear, but that is only an estimate and depends of several factors (clutch, tires, to name two). You should consider a complete 9" assembly with 28 or 31 (better) spline axles. That would be fairly bulletproof. Currie makes several that would fit - I just installed a Stage II Musclecar rearend in my '66. It fit well. I am using the TrueTrac diff, but there is nothing wrong with the Ford stuff, except it will require rebuilding at some point. The TrueTrac doesn't require rebuilding, ever. Others can offer a similar unit.

I met a guy with a 331 putting out similar power who broke his 8" pinion support a couple of times before going to the 9" and he only had 225/50-16 tires. I don't know how hard he drove it. You may have better luck. I just want you to think about it.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Jan 3, 2006
#4
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #4
Start looking at the 9" units for that hp (better safe then sorry). Also, the 9" center units are fairly common with many aftermarket products.

The only issue I see for a '66 is the smaller flange to flange distance in your axle housing (differs from the 67-70 and 71-73 rear ends). If you like to run the more common 7 or 8+ inch wide tires and don't want to flare the fenders, try to find a 64 1/2 through 66 Mustang or 57 through 59 Ranchero 9" rearend.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Jan 3, 2006
#5
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #5
I'm putting a 9" from a 59 Ford sedan in mine right now. The 58 and 59 sedans will also work. The spring width and total axle width are the same as early Mustangs.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jan 3, 2006
#6
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #6
there was a discussion about this on fordmuscle.com and 80% of the people with 400+ HP havent broken a 8" and stick with them. If your not launching on slicks at 4000 RPM,a 8" should be fine since your not shocking the rear.For a 4 speed,no more then 3.55's and that might be a little high for freeway speed with no OD.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jan 3, 2006
#7
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #7
Most people with 400hp, don't have 400hp. I would not start on a dead end road. People say I won't drag race it, or never with sticky tires, or never put a power adder on it, I know I've said them. Only to go home on a trailer when I tried all 3. I would hate to build a good motor and trans, and have to baby it because of the rear end. Build it right once. With an 8.8. Or a 9".
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 3, 2006
#8
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #8
at 400hp, especially if you are going to run slicks at all, you are on the edge of the 8" rears power limits. you can beef the 8" up a bit, but i would be looking for a 9" rear, or consider swapping in an 8.8 rear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
129
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
405
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
126
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Rear end catch can? Anyone? Bueller?
  • DadLife0724
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
328
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 27, 2025
90trunk
Resolved Anyway, to tell where this rear end came from based on this picture?
  • x_man586
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
178
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2025
x_man586
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?