• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Negative Roll System

  • Thread starter Thread starter bort.
  • Start date Start date Dec 6, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
M

mustangracer

Founding Member
Jun 15, 1999
360
0
0
Southern California
Dec 8, 2003
#21
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #21
That's what I had always heard. Is it possible that the spindles are different enough on 67-70 stangs from 65/66, that this is more of an issue with the 65/66's? I'd love to be able to hold the two up side by side to compare. That might explain a lot.
Click to expand...

Good question, but I've got '71 spindles on my '65 mustang, so they can't be too different... The ball joint & tie rod holes are the same size, but there might be a difference in how tall the spindle is and where the uper ball joint is in relation to the lower....if I was smart I'd have compared the two before I installed the '71s.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 8, 2003
#22
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #22
mustangracer said:
Good question, but I've got '71 spindles on my '65 mustang, so they can't be too different... The ball joint & tie rod holes are the same size, but there might be a difference in how tall the spindle is and where the uper ball joint is in relation to the lower....if I was smart I'd have compared the two before I installed the '71s.
Click to expand...

I believe the only difference is the later model use larger bearings and have thicker spindles. Everything else (I believe ) is proportionally the same.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 8, 2003
#23
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #23
I haven't noticed ANY problems with my 16x8 centerline wheels on my '68 coupe. My steering and suspension is 100% stock (But 100% rebuilt with new parts).
 

68GEETEE

5 Year Member
Nov 21, 2003
481
5
38
Texas, USA
Dec 8, 2003
#24
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #24
while my statement sounded incorrect, the point i was making is that the kit is usually installed by someone that is going for better handling and performance, so they need a larger type wheel and tire. They go hand in hand. I dont think I have heard of anyone installing the kit so they can put their 14X6 stock wheels back on. I realize Global West made the kit for handling reasons, but the car aint gonna handle much better with the same small wheels the factory gave it. That was the point i was making. Thanks to all who clarified it.
 

bbostic

New Member
Nov 9, 2003
2
0
1
Oak Ridge, TN
Dec 8, 2003
#25
  • Dec 8, 2003
  • #25
Quote:

<hr>
Good pick. My impression has always been that using a rim with 4.75" backspacing would stuff the upper ball into the rim, creating the interference. Your pic obviously dispells this. Pics say a thousand words.

Maybe someday I will get my stang put back together so I can research this stuff myself.
<hr>

Here is a picture of how a 17X8 4.75bs fits on my 67. The rim does not touch the upper ball joint but the wheel weight does.

<img src="http://forums.stangnet.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=15105" border="0" alt="" />
 

Attachments

  • clearance17x8_4.75bs.webp
    30.2 KB · Views: 273
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Door glass fastener question
  • limp
  • May 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
154
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 25, 2026
limp
R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
212
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
A
Fuel Capable fuel system for +600hp
  • Avia.tuned
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
85
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?