• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Exhaust System...

  • Thread starter Thread starter NosMe200
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2006
N

NosMe200

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
6
0
2
Worcester, MA
Aug 15, 2006
#1
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #1
I'm planning on getting a new exhaust system for my '84 GT, headers back...Right now I'm running MAC shorties with Flowmaster Super 40's and all else stock, no cats...My car sounds mint, but its not loud enough for my likings...I was thinking about mixing and matching a bit with Hooker Super Comp longtubes, Flowtech x-pipe, and Flowmaster Super 40's with 3 inch pipes...My questions are...Will the 3 inch pipes make much of a difference in sound vs. stock pipes? Shorty headers vs. longtubes? And, will I get good flow with my mixed setup or should I just go full Flowmaster?
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Aug 15, 2006
#2
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #2
the setup sounds good but what kind of mods do you have? Unless you have lots of cubes, or have heavy mods, 3" piping will make you lose alot of velocity or "back pressure", stick with 2.5 and get different mufflers.

Long tubes will probably sound alittle deeper then shorties. The thing right now that will change your sound the most is your mufflers, headers wont make a big enough difference, so if your just doing it for sound DO NOT waste your money or time on long tubes, if your doing it for performance then go for it. The 3" exhaust is a waste, it will hurt performance and I doubt itll sound much different. You already have no cats, switching to an xpipe will just change the sound it will not make it louder, if you want it louder get different mufflers
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Aug 15, 2006
#3
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #3
3" will sound louder, but on a stock motor like stated above wont really help making power. If you really just want it louder it might be a way to go.

Long Tubes will actually be quiter in lower RPMs but up top will be louder. My car wasnt extremely loud (LTs, prochamber and a Mac catback) down low and cruising but above 3500 RPM it really screamed. Now with the off road X and spintechs it gets really raspy and even louder!

Personally Id say 2.5" off road H or X, and whatever catback you prefer will be loud enough for you!
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Aug 15, 2006
#4
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #4
even if he just wanted the sound for 3" exhaust and didnt care about performance, it would still be ALOT cheaper to weld in a new set of straight through mufflers, rather then change the whole exhaust headers to tail pipes to 3" just for a louder sound.
 
N

NosMe200

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
6
0
2
Worcester, MA
Aug 16, 2006
#5
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #5
well, mob, i cant really tell u all my mods right down to the details, the ones i do know of are as follows, from when i bought the car...its been bored to a 306, ported and polished heads, edelbrock carb, steeda shifter, king cobra clutch, detroit locker posi rear w/ 3.55's, and then the mac shorties and flowmaster super 40's...and i was told its got a large cam, not sure of the exact model...and the thing is, i actually found a complete Flowmaster "Off-Road" system on their website that comes with all 3 inch piping...and, if anyone knows, how do the slp or spintech mufflers sound? i know their loud, but do they retain the 5.0 sound? cuz i know the slp's tend to keep that raspy camaro sound to them...
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Aug 16, 2006
#6
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #6
eh nice mod list but I still dont think enought to support 3", go with slp, the 5.0 sound is the engine, so yes those mufflers will retain the 5.0 sound, id go with slp, they will be LOUD and sound amazing, and theyll still have that deep 5.0 sound.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Aug 16, 2006
#7
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #7
Mac 1-3/4" long tubes, O/R X-pipe, and SLP Loudmouth. Not sure of engine mods, cam, etc. But, IMO one of the sickest sounding stangs I've heard.

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/mac/4/c810d932-c49b-4606-9bb9-7a18e0f3bd2d.htm
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Aug 16, 2006
#8
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #8
Id be leary about the mods listed by the previous owner. I had two friends that bought cars with similar mods as you... Both come to find out were just stock. Without receipts I wouldnt take the 30 over, and ported anything to heart.

That car sounds pretty good!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Exhaust
  • GoldenRuleClassics
  • Apr 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
231
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 21, 2025
2000xp8
C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
107
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
705
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
P
Tailpipes for '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 13, 2025
pindude80
P
J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?