New KB dyno numbers, a bit dissapointed

Ibeyorsuperman

Member

Apr 21, 2003

123

0

16

Ogden, Ut.

Aug 14, 2004

#1

• Aug 14, 2004

• #1

Well I dyno'd my KB will 11psi. It was a lil warm about 96 degrees.

Absolute barometric pressure was 25.78 in.hg.
vapor pressure 0.12 in.hg.


407RWHP @ 5200 RPM
477RWTQ @ 3400 RPM


I was hoping for a lil more on the horse side, but the torque was awesome.

 

JonJon

Founding Member

Aug 16, 2002

4,801

1

68

back in Marylands

Aug 14, 2004

#2

• Aug 14, 2004

• #2

damn

 

BrightBlue00GT

I am even OLDER than Hawk!

Jun 22, 2000

2,906

0

47

Stationed in Korea

Aug 14, 2004

#3

• Aug 14, 2004

• #3

Ibeyorsuperman said:

Well I dyno'd my KB will 11psi. It was a lil warm about 96 degrees.

Absolute barometric pressure was 25.78 in.hg.
vapor pressure 0.12 in.hg.


407RWHP @ 5200 RPM
477RWTQ @ 3400 RPM


I was hoping for a lil more on the horse side, but the torque was awesome.

Click to expand...

What other mods? That ain't bad for just the blower. Oh, wait, 11#, just realized. How is the chip tune? Give Ken a call at KB. And at 96*? That's a bit warm.

 

dmarco_4u

New Member

Mar 9, 2004

194

0

0

Aug 14, 2004

#4

• Aug 14, 2004

• #4

those are great numbers
you are almost at limit what stock blocks/internals can handle.

 

0

007

Founding Member

Jan 29, 2002

3,287

24

69

Broke

Aug 14, 2004

#5

• Aug 14, 2004

• #5

Ibeyorsuperman said:

Well I dyno'd my KB will 11psi. It was a lil warm about 96 degrees.

Absolute barometric pressure was 25.78 in.hg.
vapor pressure 0.12 in.hg.


407RWHP @ 5200 RPM
477RWTQ @ 3400 RPM


I was hoping for a lil more on the horse side, but the torque was awesome.

Click to expand...

Thats some sick torque.

 

i4power

Founding Member

Jan 11, 2002

1,083

0

0

Eglin AFB, Florida

Aug 14, 2004

#6

• Aug 14, 2004

• #6

I'm willing to bet that some better cams will help convert some of that low-end torque to a nice chunk of high-RPM HP.

 

M

MustangLife

Active Member

Jan 5, 2003

1,285

0

36

Chattanooga, TN

Aug 14, 2004

#7

• Aug 14, 2004

• #7

i4power wrote

I'm willing to bet that some better cams will help convert some of that low-end torque to a nice chunk of high-RPM HP.

Click to expand...

Except most of the gains made are for cars with higher rpm ranges. And KB doesn't recommend spinning there blower past 6000 rpms and is meant to be kept with the stock rev limiter.

Josh

 

E

el_kid_1

New Member

Oct 30, 2003

738

0

0

Puerto Rico

Aug 14, 2004

#8

• Aug 14, 2004

• #8

That is some torque

 

E

el_kid_1

New Member

Oct 30, 2003

738

0

0

Puerto Rico

Aug 14, 2004

#9

• Aug 14, 2004

• #9

BTW, are you running on stock internals? What fuel grade are you feeding your stang? I just upgraded to the 10 pis pulley and I'm suing 93 octane with a can of octane booster everytime I feel up the tank. And still, I'm a bit scare about flooring the car. Ken says I should ahev no problems, but you never know.

 

Dr. Wu 2000

New Member

Feb 16, 2004

554

0

0

Eastern, Pa.

Aug 14, 2004

#10

• Aug 14, 2004

• #10

Hope this never happens, but I see your new thread down the road reading " just blew up the GT, what now?" Hope the motor holds up, seems like your running on borrowed time. Hate to see something happen to it after all the time and money you put into it. Don't get too greedy.

 

00s281sc368

New Member

Dec 14, 2003

532

0

0

Fremont, CA

Aug 15, 2004

#11

• Aug 15, 2004

• #11

These are good numbers! 477rwtq
Are your peak HP at 5200rpm or did they just stop measuring it at that rpm? Because the KB will pull all the way to 6000rpm! So you should get over 450rwhp at 6000rpm
Unless you still have the stock intake...you're maxed out...

 

tontot77

Do I look like a :taco: in this picture?

Apr 2, 2003

409

0

16

Dyer Indiana

Aug 15, 2004

#12

• Aug 15, 2004

• #12

you are driving a bomb... imo. I hope honestly I'm wrong, but that tq will eat your hypercrap internals... I think. Heck, what do I know... awesome numbers though.

 

KaPPaBaLL

New Member

Nov 28, 2003

1,326

0

0

BAYAREA

Aug 15, 2004

#13

• Aug 15, 2004

• #13

25.78 barometric pressure is pretty low. That and the fact that it was 98 degrees!!! bit warm no way. that's fugging hot. I hope you have a great tune or else.. BOOM!

 

Ibeyorsuperman

Member

Apr 21, 2003

123

0

16

Ogden, Ut.

Aug 15, 2004

#14

• Aug 15, 2004

• #14

It has a pretty rich tune on it. Plus im running 100 octane. Im looking into so VT blower cams. Then hopefully this winter...build the motor. Thanks for the compliments.


nate

 

KaPPaBaLL

New Member

Nov 28, 2003

1,326

0

0

BAYAREA

Aug 15, 2004

#15

• Aug 15, 2004

• #15

 

JLstang351

Founding Member

Jun 26, 2001

528

0

0

atl,ga

Aug 15, 2004

#16

• Aug 15, 2004

• #16

00s281sc368 said:

These are good numbers! 477rwtq
Are your peak HP at 5200rpm or did they just stop measuring it at that rpm? Because the KB will pull all the way to 6000rpm! So you should get over 450rwhp at 6000rpm
Unless you still have the stock intake...you're maxed out...

Click to expand...

Keene Bell replaces the stock intake!!

 

00s281sc368

New Member

Dec 14, 2003

532

0

0

Fremont, CA

Aug 16, 2004

#17

• Aug 16, 2004

• #17

JLstang351 said:

Keene Bell replaces the stock intake!!

Click to expand...

By intake I obviously meant air filter, MAF and TB all the way to the manifold. The stock ones max out at 400rwhp .

 

MT1083

New Member

Sep 16, 2003

1,033

0

0

Charlotte, NC

Aug 16, 2004

#18

• Aug 16, 2004

• #18

Man that is some insane torque! Nice numbers

 

BrightBlue00GT

I am even OLDER than Hawk!

Jun 22, 2000

2,906

0

47

Stationed in Korea

Aug 16, 2004

#19

• Aug 16, 2004

• #19

00s281sc368 said:

By intake I obviously meant air filter, MAF and TB all the way to the manifold. The stock ones max out at 400rwhp .

Click to expand...

KB replaces all those as an option. I have the 90mm MAF, 75mm TB, and Cool Air kit with new K&N filter.