• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New times...fairly stock AODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotQuik
  • Start date Start date Feb 1, 2006

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Feb 1, 2006
#1
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #1
Car ran 14.91@92.90 w/ 2.2 60' and best mph was 93.33 with only mods being bumped timing and removed air silencer, I've since done o/r h-pipe and flowmaster catback. First pass 14.786@94.44 against my fiances IS300 which went 15.955@88.63 w/ 2.506 60' so needless to say she has alittle left in her car as well with some more practice and she had a friend with her too. My 2nd pass was 14.833@94.45 w/ 2.234 60' so I guess i'm fairly content for what little is done and for it being an AODE....still collecting parts for 5 speed swap though, and I have an e-cam in my closet just waiting for atleast an intake manifold and we'll see what follows.
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Feb 1, 2006
#2
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #2
pretty good for an auto, thos were my times with exhaist and cai.
 

Cantslowdown

New Member
Jun 20, 2004
502
1
0
Mt.Home AR!
Feb 1, 2006
#3
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #3
So what would a Aode run with just pulleys and intake and x pipe?
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Feb 1, 2006
#4
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #4
1Bad89Coupe said:
I've since done o/r h-pipe and flowmaster catback. First pass 14.786@94.44 .
Click to expand...
Did you read what he wrote? lol
 

Cantslowdown

New Member
Jun 20, 2004
502
1
0
Mt.Home AR!
Feb 1, 2006
#5
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #5
Yes I did but i thought with the timing bumped that would be alot of help..
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Feb 1, 2006
#6
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #6
its not hard to bump the timing, someone one here bumped timing and got .2? of there times.
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Feb 2, 2006
#7
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #7
Completely bone stock it went 15.2@92.4 w/ 2.3 60' if that helps that was with 8 degress of timing because the car was detonating alot at that time.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Feb 2, 2006
#8
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #8
Damn amazing times for an AODE! I'm impressed to say the least.


A bump of 2* of timing in my car yeilded a reduction of .06 off my ET. 15.02 to a 14.96.
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
Feb 2, 2006
#9
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #9
that is nice. The fastest I have gone is 90.1mph. 10 timing, k&N, flows, mac h-pipe and converter. Maybe I will hit 93 after doing some tweaking.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Feb 2, 2006
#10
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #10
Nice times. My first time out w/just flows, stock timing, and a transgo kit, (hot as hell outside) I ran a 15.1 @ 93.3. I was satisfied it being my first time out. I knew that with better conditions and 12* of timing, easily a 14.8-14.9 was possible.

This spring I'll have new times with my ported heads, and TFS Intake.
 

Cantslowdown

New Member
Jun 20, 2004
502
1
0
Mt.Home AR!
Feb 2, 2006
#11
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #11
Thats nice to know cuz i am looking at a 95 automatic..
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Feb 2, 2006
#12
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #12
(whisper)get a 5-speed(whisper) lol.
 

94MustangGT5.0

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
288
0
0
Champaign, Illinois
Feb 2, 2006
#13
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #13
Those are very good times and speeds for a nearly stock AODE. I think that trapping anywhere near 95 mph with the mods you have on your car is awesome. What temperature was it when you ran the car? I have always noticed a very nice gain in performance when I give my car a chance to cool off as well (engine temp), so if you haven't tried that, it may be worth it.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Feb 2, 2006
#14
  • Feb 2, 2006
  • #14
you will be pleased with the 5-speed swap, no matter how many headaches (which are inevitable) come with the swap.

It will be a whole new car!
 
P

Pure Stock

New Member
Feb 5, 2006
4
0
2
Feb 5, 2006
#15
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #15
1Bad89Coupe said:
Car ran 14.91@92.90 w/ 2.2 60' and best mph was 93.33 with only mods being bumped timing and removed air silencer, I've since done o/r h-pipe and flowmaster catback. First pass 14.786@94.44 against my fiances IS300 which went 15.955@88.63 w/ 2.506 60' so needless to say she has alittle left in her car as well with some more practice and she had a friend with her too. My 2nd pass was 14.833@94.45 w/ 2.234 60' so I guess i'm fairly content for what little is done and for it being an AODE....still collecting parts for 5 speed swap though, and I have an e-cam in my closet just waiting for atleast an intake manifold and we'll see what follows.
Click to expand...

The 5-speed swap will net you some good gains for sure. I had the chance to ring out a '94 GT at my local track in southwestern PA. This was a 5-speed 5-liter with 3.08's in the 8.8. It was a somewhat odd optioned one with pwr. windows, locks and trunk. Speed control, A/C, and rear window defogger were factory deleted. A standard AM/FM cassette was also present in this sn-95. I bumped the timing to 14 degrees initial and removed the air silencer as you did. The only other mod that I performed was the deletion of the serpentine belt. This was a full weight 5-liter and was raced with a 1/4 tank of sunoco 93. I was able to attain a 13.90@96.97 in this trim. Interestingly, the removal of the serpentine belt was almost worth .35 tenths over keeping the belt on. The track altitude was 1210' and was in cool oct. air. Good luck!
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Feb 5, 2006
#16
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #16
Hey Joe, welcome to the site! I've talked about your unreal 13 second stocker for years on here, it nice to see that you are actually here. I didn't realize you had a GTS version, or at least it sounds like you did.
 
P

Pure Stock

New Member
Feb 5, 2006
4
0
2
Feb 5, 2006
#17
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #17
It was a nice 5-Liter, especially having the chance to pilot a 1993 and a 1986. The ride was a phenomenal improvement over the FOX's and the driveline performed flawlessly. I had a low mileage example, which I am sure helps, BUT I wouldn't hesistate to add an SN-95 to the stable in the future.

I appreciate the welcome Paul. Believe it or not the reason I bought that sn-95 is because a buddy of mine hooked up with a canary yellow 94 GT way back when those things first hit the showroom. I mean within the 1st month of the 94's arriving this guy had one. It was a 5-speed with black leather, speed control, A/C, pwr. lcks,wndws,trunk. Pwr. seat, and the standard AM/FM cassette. I had the chance to drive it for a weekend with a scant 1,500 miles on it at the time. It was like nothing I had driven before, ergonomics were great, the design was a departure from the FOX's in almost every aspect and it was solid.

I wnt the SVT version when I do put one in the stable. It would be quite a challenge to wring out that version in STOCKER form. Let me ask you this Paul, what would be a reasonable e.t. from a 94-5 cobra with the same mods I had performed on my GT?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New track times...aode
  • NotQuik
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
553
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 28, 2005
95Vert
New Best Time w/ RAM AIR install.....
  • ga289stocker
  • Nov 4, 2006
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
795
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 4, 2006
66Runt
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?