• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

newbie with supercharger question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mxracer357
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

GT12207

Member
Feb 5, 2003
86
0
6
California
Nov 28, 2006
#41
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #41
I did not read this thread, but I've read and researched my fair share of the centri VS twin screw war.

let me put it this way, just go to any classified section of any mustang forum or even on Ebay and look for a used mustang supercharger kit. you'll see that 98% the ones for sale are vortech/paxton/procharger.

very rarely will you see someone sell their Kenne Bell kit. and those who do, usually sell it to upgrade to an even bigger KB model or taking the twin turbo route.


that's the bottom line. i don't care the pro's and con's on each style bla bla bla this one is for racing that one is for street bla bla bla depends on gears bla!

a new KB kit is significantly more expensive than a comparable Vortech kit, yet people still buy the KB like crazy. try calling the KB order phone number and see if you could get through.

a used complete vortech kit for 99-04 could be had for around $2500 right now if money is a big issue.. good deal
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 28, 2006
#42
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #42
GT12207 said:
I did not read this thread, but I've read and researched my fair share of the centri VS twin screw war.

let me put it this way, just go to any classified section of any mustang forum or even on Ebay and look for a used mustang supercharger kit. you'll see that 98% the ones for sale are vortech/paxton/procharger.

very rarely will you see someone sell their Kenne Bell kit. and those who do, usually sell it to upgrade to an even bigger KB model or taking the twin turbo route.


that's the bottom line. i don't care the pro's and con's on each style bla bla bla this one is for racing that one is for street bla bla blad depends on gears bla!
Click to expand...
No offence, but that statement proves nothing!

First off, Centrifugals kits for the most part are much cheaper than Kenne Bell kits. So selling them off and upgrading them to another blower, whether it be a Kenne Bell, or otherwise doesn't put that big of a dent in the wallet. Kenne Bells on the other hand are quite expensive (twice the price in some cases) and your average enthusiast more often than not can't afford to or can’t be bothered (and admittedly are usually content with the power they make) to upgrade beyond what they've got. So usually, when someone gets one, they keep it. Not to mention the cost and work involved in going from a centrifugal to a Positive Displacement supercharger is much less than doing it the other way around.

Secondly, Kenne Bell has pretty much cornered the market as far as the positive displacement superchargers concerned. Sure you've got a few others on the market now, but they're either A) not very well known (Allen), B) have terrible marketing, not to mention don't sell a true complete kit (FRPP), C) don't build their own kit specific to the Ford Modular (Whipple) or D) are far to expensive by comparison (Saleen and Roush). That puts Kenne Bell in a great position right off the bat with out even having to sell a kit.

Third....Kenne Bell has master story tellers working for them and writing their advertisements. Their adds read more like creative writing assignment than spec sheets and that type of exaggeration certainly works in their favor. If someone didn’t know any better, why wouldn’t they believe what they had to say? Nobody said you had to be smart or mechanically inclined to own a fast car. If it’s in writing, it must be true, right? Not to mention Kenne Bell makes it a practice to badmouth and show up their competitors with their own brand of “controlled testing” and skewed results that somehow always work out in their favor, while the whole time neglecting to, or smoothing over their own products shortcomings. When was the last time you heard any other supercharger manufacturer refer to another’s product as “inferior” or “second rate” the way Kenne Bell does? You want to talk inferior….lets talk Kenne Bell customer service. But that’s a whole other ball of wax.

Finally and probably most importantly is the fact that you've got three major brands that actively sell centrifugal superchargers for the 4.6L line up, two of which have been around for going on 10-years now, where the Modular based Kenne Bell kits have only been around for less than half that time. A lot of owners are just plain and simply willing to try something different than what the other guy has. There's always a lot of hype associated with being the new kid on the block and Kenne Bell has capitalized on it. No, they're not new to supercharging, but as far as their modular life span goes, they're still babies compared to Paxton and Vortech, so why not put yourself out there.

What does this all mean…..absolutely nothing! Every one of them puts out a dud here and there, has good and bad experiences and has very satisfied or dissatisfied customers on both ends. The fact of the matter is, is that Kenne Bell puts out a great kit….but no any greater than anyone else in the supercharger game like they would like you to believe. The sooner the Kenne Bell nut huggers realize that and stop sucking up and regurgitating Kenne Bell propaganda like Parrots quoting gospel and come back down to a realistic plane of existance, the better off everyone will be.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Nov 28, 2006
#43
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #43
How about arguing via PM instead of in the thread.
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Nov 28, 2006
#44
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #44
I started with a Paxton Novi 2000 and then a 2.2 KB. Having had both, I highly recommend the Kenne Bell. I recently ran a 9.67 at 139 mph with the 2.2 KB at a race weight of 3250. If you plan to build your bottom end, get the 2.6 KB. Otherwise, get the 2.1 KB. I recently got a 2.8 KB and ran 9.47 at 143, but the 2.8 is not commercially available for a 2V.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 28, 2006
#45
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #45
sgarlic said:
How about arguing via PM instead of in the thread.
Click to expand...
Who's arguing? The thread started wanted opinions, he got them!
 

GT12207

Member
Feb 5, 2003
86
0
6
California
Nov 29, 2006
#46
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #46
Gearbanger 101 said:
The sooner the Kenne Bell nut huggers realize that and stop sucking up and regurgitating Kenne Bell propaganda like Parrots quoting gospel and come back down to a realistic plane of existance, the better off everyone will be.
Click to expand...

before you ever make that statement again, look at how defensive you are of vortech/paxton/procharger. why are you taking this so personally bud? calling people "nut huggers" and such when we're all having an adult discussion about superchargers.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Nov 29, 2006
#47
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #47
:SNSign:
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Nov 29, 2006
#48
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #48
Remember, with the KB you do not need to buy or be concerned about intake manifolds.

I very much respect Gearbanger101 and his vast knowledge. I would suggest that anyone who does not respect and take into consideration his automotive knowledge and expertise is making a grave mistake.

However, that being said, I would buy the KB if it was me.
 

01KBGT

New Member
Jun 13, 2005
14
0
2
Long Island
Nov 29, 2006
#49
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #49
I went back and forth between Vortech and KB, obviously went with the KB. This kit is awesome in every aspect, installation, fit and finish, driveability, and just plain fun.
The only complaint is KB does exaggerate the power levels. On their website, they quote 400 plus RWHP for the 9lb kit. You will only see that on a very aggressive, not very safe tune with a ton of timing and 100 octane gas.
With that said, the 370 RWHP feels awesome. Care pulls like a raped ape. Instant power and decent track times. (Below coming out easy with a 1.85 60')
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Nov 29, 2006
#50
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #50
is your car stock otherwise 01? i believe that is the reason why you are not seeing the 'easy' 400

i could be wrong though
 

DaNd4Speed

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
180
0
0
Patterson, NY
Nov 29, 2006
#51
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #51
01KBGT said:
I went back and forth between Vortech and KB, obviously went with the KB. This kit is awesome in every aspect, installation, fit and finish, driveability, and just plain fun.
The only complaint is KB does exaggerate the power levels. On their website, they quote 400 plus RWHP for the 9lb kit. You will only see that on a very aggressive, not very safe tune with a ton of timing and 100 octane gas.
With that said, the 370 RWHP feels awesome. Care pulls like a raped ape. Instant power and decent track times. (Below coming out easy with a 1.85 60')
Click to expand...

I see youre from LI, we should race our cars sometime at etown. Should be a pretty good match!
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Nov 29, 2006
#52
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #52
01KBGT said:
I went back and forth between Vortech and KB, obviously went with the KB. This kit is awesome in every aspect, installation, fit and finish, driveability, and just plain fun.
The only complaint is KB does exaggerate the power levels. On their website, they quote 400 plus RWHP for the 9lb kit. You will only see that on a very aggressive, not very safe tune with a ton of timing and 100 octane gas.
With that said, the 370 RWHP feels awesome. Care pulls like a raped ape. Instant power and decent track times. (Below coming out easy with a 1.85 60')
Click to expand...
That's not normally true. You must have some other issues with your setup or tune.
 
D

dsperrine02

New Member
Nov 29, 2006
1
0
0
Nov 29, 2006
#53
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #53
360 R pulley upgrade

I just bought a 2002 Roush 360R, I installed the off-road H-pipe, ordered a pulley for the s/c to go from 6lbs boost to 8lbs as well as 3.73 gears, then i will tune and dyno it. My question is how much difference can i expect to see, im really curious how much difference the pulley will make. Also what can i do next?
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Nov 29, 2006
#54
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #54
I would go with neither, For the price of the KB, you can get a single turbo setup. Here's why I suggest this.
I started w/ a Vortech on my 99gt. Poor "seat of pants" feel till I upped it to 10psi and got custom tune. Made 410RWHP, 360RWTQ

The low end is very poor (for my taste) with vortech, however, top end is very good. Must keep engine wound up though.

The KB setup was nice. A lot more low end. Was tuned to 415RWHP but made 390 RWTQ. the added torque mage the car more fun to drive, as did the increase in low end power.

On to the T-70.
I got bored with my setup (as most back yard tinkerers do) and made my own turbo setup. (I could have bought the identical kit for $5K but hey, I'm cheap) Boost comes on after the KB, but before the vortech. Final numbers were 429RWHP, and 502RWTQ.

Note the torque differance. Car is A LOT more fun to drive.

This torque increase is because unlike a supercharger, a turbochargers max boost DOES NOT have to be at redline.

The vortech and KB make boost as a function of RPM. More RPM, more boost.
The boost from a turbo is a function of airflow. more flow, more boost.

Here's an example. With my vortech setup, I would make 10psi at 5,800RPM
with the turbo, I make 10 psi at 3,100RPM all the way to 6,500RPM.

Most of your daily driving/ screwing with other cars, you don't see redline, therefor, don't see full potential from your supercharger.

My vote is for Turbo.
 

01KBGT

New Member
Jun 13, 2005
14
0
2
Long Island
Nov 29, 2006
#55
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #55
-=NightHawk=- said:
is your car stock otherwise 01? i believe that is the reason why you are not seeing the 'easy' 400

i could be wrong though
Click to expand...

Power Mods are a 70mm Throttle Body and a K&N factory replacement. 370 - 380 is right on for that set up. I've seen a 9lb with the Kenne Bell MAF and big tube kit put down 395. Too close to the limits of the engine for me. The tune I have is nice and safe.
 

01KBGT

New Member
Jun 13, 2005
14
0
2
Long Island
Nov 29, 2006
#56
  • Nov 29, 2006
  • #56
DaNd4Speed said:
I see youre from LI, we should race our cars sometime at etown. Should be a pretty good match!
Click to expand...

117 is a damn good trap for the power your making. Any weight reduction or slicks? And yes, i am interested. Don't make it to E town much though.
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Nov 30, 2006
#57
  • Nov 30, 2006
  • #57
Rickey_Bobby said:
Here's an example. With my vortech setup, I would make 10psi at 5,800RPM
with the turbo, I make 10 psi at 3,100RPM all the way to 6,500RPM.
Click to expand...

What about the KB? I've seen videos where it looks like the boost gauge hits 9psi long before redline.

That is a huge torque difference though. That was at 3100RPM?
 

DaNd4Speed

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
180
0
0
Patterson, NY
Nov 30, 2006
#58
  • Nov 30, 2006
  • #58
01KBGT said:
117 is a damn good trap for the power your making. Any weight reduction or slicks? And yes, i am interested. Don't make it to E town much though.
Click to expand...

I don't make it to the track much either. I was lucky to make it only 2 times this year. And before that it has been nearly 2 years. But now that I have the Goose, I've get that warm tingly feeling again when I go racing on the weekend.

I was running 15" welds with Nitto DR's if you want to call that weight reduction. 3500lbs with me in the car. I stil couldn't cut anything less than a 1.9 60ft.

The temp was in the low 50's, so I think that had alot to do with it. When the car was dyno'd it was 88° hence the low figures. I've been told that with my traps I was probably around the 400rwhp mark that day. Hmm maybe I should ante up for an intercooler?
 
J

jesus351c

New Member
Nov 28, 2006
2
0
0
Nov 30, 2006
#59
  • Nov 30, 2006
  • #59
i need some help. Vortech, Procharger or Paxton recomend me

and well what is better?? i need some help too!!
i have a GT 2002, shorty headers (For Racing), 373 rear end, KN filter, Shaker Scoop System in the hood, wheels bfgoodrich gforce KD 335-35-r17 back and 275-40-r17 front, Microchips tunner, X-pipe 3" and exhaust system (all 304 SS) pipes exhaust violator.

i need a supercharger, but i don´t know what buy?? PAXTON, PROCHARGER, OR VORTECH, I NEED MORE HORSE POWER!!!!!!

ohh i forgot say, the bad thing is thah my stang have a slow-matic transmission, buy i'm in process to buy a new 6 speed manual transsmision for 2800 dls aprox.

thanks really, and sorry i dont speak english very good.
 
J

jesus351c

New Member
Nov 28, 2006
2
0
0
Nov 30, 2006
#60
  • Nov 30, 2006
  • #60
jesus351c said:
and well what is better?? i need some help too!!
i have a GT 2002, shorty headers (For Racing), 373 rear end, KN filter, Shaker Scoop System in the hood, wheels bfgoodrich gforce KD 335-35-r17 back and 275-40-r17 front, Microchips tunner, X-pipe 3" and exhaust system (all 304 SS) pipes exhaust violator.

i need a supercharger, but i don´t know what buy?? PAXTON, PROCHARGER, OR VORTECH, I NEED MORE HORSE POWER!!!!!!

ohh i forgot say, the bad thing is thah my stang have a slow-matic transmission, buy i'm in process to buy a new 6 speed manual transsmision for 2800 dls aprox.

thanks really, and sorry i dont speak english very good.
Click to expand...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
S302 Saleen supercharger help
  • sschoup
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
2
Views
319
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Nov 19, 2025
sschoup
S
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
296
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
643
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
T
A/C Compressor Reliability with Supercharger Setup – Need Advice
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 29, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
189
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 29, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
897
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?