• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

No vacuum to FPR.. Side effects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MusPuppis
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2004
M

MusPuppis

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
136
0
0
Lexington, Ky.
Dec 3, 2004
#1
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #1
Just curious what cutting the vacuum to the FPR does exactly?
 
S

ss93cobra

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
1,422
1
0
Wilmington NC
Dec 3, 2004
#2
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #2
Well, not a good idea. The fuel pressure is designed to fluctuate with the amount of air going into the engine (whole air to fuel ratio principle) and the vacuum is drawn via the intake opening the f.p.r. keeping the ratios at even levels through the rpm range. Disconnecting the vacuum will cause fuel richness and lean concerns. I'd find something better to do.
 
M

MusPuppis

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
136
0
0
Lexington, Ky.
Dec 3, 2004
#3
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #3
Thanks.

I wasnt planning on removing it, but was curious as to the side effects of having it vacuumless. My intake is on backwards, and thus sits over the FPR and its an extremely tight fit.. Theres some question as to whether or not its getting vacuum and I was curious what sort of side effects would be noticed assuming its not.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 3, 2004
#4
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #4
If you were to put a fuel pressure gauge on the system, you'd see that when you apply vacuum to the regulator, it reduces the fuel pressure proportionately with how much vacuum is applied. At idle on a stock engine, the pressure will drop from about 39--40 down to 32 or 33 psi when vacuum is applied. As the previous poster described, the whole idea is to reduce the system pressure during low load (high vacuum) conditions when the engine doesn't need as much fuel. Keep in mind that's only one way fuel delivery is impacted. Once in closed loop, the O2 sensors work with the ecu to control air/fuel ratio by altering cycle time or pulse width (how long the injector is held open).

So, if you removed the vacuum hose or if it's getting pinched - you'd be richer during cold start up (open loop and higher fuel pressure). Once the system went into closed loop, the ecu would begin adjusting pulse width to try and reduce the amount of excess fuel that was being injected. Basically over time the adaptive strategies of the ecu would compensate for the higher pressure.

At wide open throttle, there'd be no impact from removing the vacuum line. Removing the vacuum line emulates what happens when you floor it - there's no vacuum in the intake then.
 
M

MusPuppis

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
136
0
0
Lexington, Ky.
Dec 3, 2004
#5
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #5
Hm.. Thanks ALOT.

That may explain a problem Im having. My motor is running VERY rich at idle, but once the engine gets good and warmed up, it leans out and drives considerably better. I pulled the FPR's vac line off the intake and plugged the intake hole with my finger.. I didnt notice any different at all, which could perhaps mean it doesnt have any (or very very little) to begin with.

I may pull my upper intake (again..) and see if I can find some way to bend the bracket on the fuel rail to drop the FPR down a little. Im worried its being pinched or restricted when the intake is on.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 3, 2004
#6
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #6
Take a look at some of the other vacuum line fittings on the car. The thermactor and egr switches (firewall) have some 90-degree elbow fittings. One of those might work a little better on the fpr with the manifold sitting right over top of it.
 
M

MusPuppis

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
136
0
0
Lexington, Ky.
Dec 3, 2004
#7
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #7
Thats what Im using actually, pirated from the EGR line.

I switched to that cut it down very slightly, cut about a millimeter off the FPR stalk and bent the bracket down some before I put the intake on. I'm pretty sure I have enough clearance but I'm gonna check again just to be sure.
 
S

ss93cobra

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
1,422
1
0
Wilmington NC
Dec 3, 2004
#8
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #8
Good luck to you!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
259
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
D
Please help with vacuum lines
  • Dawgs000082
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
97
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
Dawgs000082
D
C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
61
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 2, 2026
chasecollier1984
C
H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
489
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?