• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

NosZle v.s. Fogger.... Opinions please

  • Thread starter Thread starter EDGE Motorsport
  • Start date Start date Jul 14, 2005

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Jul 14, 2005
#1
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #1
Hi guys,

im looking at nitrous kits for the Saleen and was wondering the total benefits of the Noszle system over a regular fogger nosle set-up.

I know the direct port will help get a better mixture in to each cylinder but is it really worth the extra $900 !!!!!

I was told that as i am running a blower, the fogger would work fine as the extra air velocity of the blower would help atomise and mix the gas in the intake anyway..

So im here looking for advice and experience guys...

any opinions/idea/recommendations/advice greatly recieved

thanks

EDGE
 

SonicBlueBabe

New Member
Sep 20, 2003
289
0
0
Boca Raton, FL
Jul 14, 2005
#2
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #2
EDGE Motorsport said:
Hi guys,

im looking at nitrous kits for the Saleen and was wondering the total benefits of the Noszle system over a regular fogger nosle set-up.

I know the direct port will help get a better mixture in to each cylinder but is it really worth the extra $900 !!!!!

I was told that as i am running a blower, the fogger would work fine as the extra air velocity of the blower would help atomise and mix the gas in the intake anyway..

So im here looking for advice and experience guys...

any opinions/idea/recommendations/advice greatly recieved

thanks

EDGE
Click to expand...

The fogger is the safer way to go. if i had extra money i would have gotten that
 

96WhiteNight

New Member
May 11, 2004
303
0
0
Carlisle, PA
Jul 14, 2005
#3
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #3
Yea run the fogger system
 

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Jul 14, 2005
#4
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #4
so then, so far we're thinking that the $500 single fogger in the intake trac is better than the $1400 direct port system......

really ??

Im not doubting anyones opinion but if the fogger is better, ill probably be buying that and saving the $900 for forged bits...

EDGE
 

SonicBlueBabe

New Member
Sep 20, 2003
289
0
0
Boca Raton, FL
Jul 14, 2005
#5
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #5
EDGE Motorsport said:
so then, so far we're thinking that the $500 single fogger in the intake trac is better than the $1400 direct port system......

really ??

Im not doubting anyones opinion but if the fogger is better, ill probably be buying that and saving the $900 for forged bits...

EDGE
Click to expand...
I'm such an idiot, i meant to say the direct port!!!!!!! im sorry! they are both good though
 

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Jul 14, 2005
#6
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #6
i figured something maybe up....

so what does 96whitenight mean... dude, you meaning he fogger ?? or the direct port ?

Anyone else got any ideas ?

EDGE
 

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Jul 15, 2005
#7
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • #7
bumpage
 

LS2 KLR

Member
Apr 16, 2003
452
0
17
Houston, TX
Jul 15, 2005
#8
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • #8
I've had a dry, wet, and now have the nos direct port system. The direct port is by far the safest! I blew up my stock intake with a single fogger kit, lol. However, with a s/c a single fogger is the best way to go. You're using the nitrous more as an intercooler. With a 75 shot you can expect 75-100 extra rwhp.
 
M

Mustangl3

New Member
Dec 3, 2003
242
0
0
willow grove, pa
Jul 15, 2005
#9
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • #9
did you blow your intake with a wet kit?
 
0

02 Mineral Gray

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
100
0
0
Atlantic City, NJ
Jul 15, 2005
#10
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • #10
I just got the direct port Noszle I figure my engine is worth the extra money.

Just my .02 cents
 

blackink00

I missed a shift & stole Curt's money.
Mar 30, 2005
545
0
0
Tempe, AZ
Jul 15, 2005
#11
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • #11
instead of doing the noszle i would do a NX fogger. you should have no problem with it. i say NX because NOS rates at flywheel which suck.
 

LS2 KLR

Member
Apr 16, 2003
452
0
17
Houston, TX
Jul 15, 2005
#12
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • #12
blackink00 said:
instead of doing the noszle i would do a NX fogger. you should have no problem with it. i say NX because NOS rates at flywheel which suck.
Click to expand...


I was making 200rwhp through a single fogger wet kit and it puddled, blowing up my intake. With up to a 125 shot I wouldn't even worry about puddling and a 150 is slightly risky.

As far as flywheel to tire rating, who cares. It doesn't make one kit better than the other. If you're getting 125rwhp then 150 nos would make the same. It just sounds good when giving numbers. Its simply an orifice and if you matched up jets of the same "hole" size, they will put out very similar numbers, not matter what the company rates them at.

However, I do wish they would all give them in rwhp numbers because that is all that really matters. I call mine a 200 shot even though I have jets for a 225 due to that being what it makes additionally on the gas
 

triggz

Founding Member
May 15, 2002
1,218
0
37
Gadsden, AL
Jul 16, 2005
#13
  • Jul 16, 2005
  • #13
Nozzle system. I've heard a lot of complaints about the fogger systems having complications. You might consider getting the NX Plate, it will do good to eliminate the chance of puddling.
 

LS2 KLR

Member
Apr 16, 2003
452
0
17
Houston, TX
Jul 16, 2005
#14
  • Jul 16, 2005
  • #14
triggz said:
Nozzle system. I've heard a lot of complaints about the fogger systems having complications. You might consider getting the NX Plate, it will do good to eliminate the chance of puddling.
Click to expand...


The plate system does sound pretty cool but I'd like to see some users input. I have heard of people having problems with the nozzle kit but am not sure what they were. Mine took exactly two pulls to be dynoed correctly
 

EDGE Motorsport

Member
Sep 24, 2004
561
2
19
Saleen S281, London, UK
Jul 16, 2005
#15
  • Jul 16, 2005
  • #15
thanks for the ideas guys.

the problem isnt to cost involved (although that is a consideration) but i was told that with a supercharger, a fogger was best as it should illiminate any puddling anyway ?!?!? not sure how but something to do with the aire flowing faster through the intake and atomising the gas/nitrous mix better...

i guess i could get a fogger, and maybe upgrade to a noszle later ? you can buy the bits seperately.

Im thinking that the fogger idea makes plausable sense now actually, with all the aire rushing past it... hmmmmmmmmm


EDGE
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine Another 393 stroker thread
  • GoldenGrande
  • Jun 2, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 2, 2019
GoldenGrande
G
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
B
KB 2.1 on '03 GT
  • Bowtierebel
  • Sep 30, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 7, 2018
Dark04GT
G
Please Help Me Fix Grandma's Mustang
  • Granny's Mustang
  • Jun 22, 2014
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
971
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 28, 2014
Granny's Mustang
G
What combo to use??? 450 rwhp goal...
  • OiDALE
  • Oct 10, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2011
Gearbanger 101
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?