• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Not a fan of the "5.0 is back" theme

  • Thread starter Thread starter Burns331
  • Start date Start date Oct 19, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
B

Burns331

Member
Jun 12, 2010
107
0
16
Oct 19, 2010
#1
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #1
I’m not a fan of people saying the 5.0 is back. I know ford is doing it as marketing to sell cars and i get that. But that doesn’t mean i have to like it.

It’s a completely different engine, sharing nothing the same as the current 5.0. I do like the mod motors more than the Windsor’s, but that really doesn’t have anything to do with me not liking the idea.

I guess what I dont like is people who don’t know the difference saying, "ooo the 5.0 is back and now the ford can make some real power, good thing they got rid of that stupid 4.6l". I have seen that some on here, but more in other places.

Anyways, small rant that doesn’t really mean anything. Maybe a conversational piece.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Oct 19, 2010
#2
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #2
um ok.
 

Kman92

Active Member
Nov 4, 2007
27
8
39
Jax,FLorida
Oct 19, 2010
#3
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #3
:stirpot: ... opcorn:
 
B

Burns331

Member
Jun 12, 2010
107
0
16
Oct 19, 2010
#4
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #4
Im not trying to start a fight really. I just wanted to see what other think of Ford trying to tie the old 5.0 to the new one. I liked the old 5.0, and im sure I will like the new one even more. I just know they are completley unrelated engine designs.
 

jaybertx

Member
Apr 18, 2003
387
1
18
Sarasota, FL
Oct 19, 2010
#5
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #5
You're reading into it too deeply. Coyote this, Windsor that. To heck with all of that. The 5.0 IS back. Just look at the badge on the side of the car.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 19, 2010
#6
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #6
It's a game changing engine with a great exhaust note and lots of possibilities. While it's nowhere close to the same engine as the former 5.0, it's the excitement that's back.
 
B

Burns331

Member
Jun 12, 2010
107
0
16
Oct 19, 2010
#7
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #7
A 5.0 is back, not THEE 5.0... thats my only point. The new engine is the game changer, cant wait to get mine.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Oct 19, 2010
#8
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #8
GroverDill said:
um ok.
Click to expand...

+1
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Oct 19, 2010
#9
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #9
Bottom line, is there is a "5.0 back" in the stang...True or False?
RC
 

jaybertx

Member
Apr 18, 2003
387
1
18
Sarasota, FL
Oct 19, 2010
#10
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #10
Well, if we're going to get technical... since the Windsor was only 4.9L, shouldn't that be "there is FINALLY a 5.0 in the stang"?
 

1wildGT

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
1,026
6
38
Abilene TX
Oct 19, 2010
#11
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #11
My 2011 3.7 makes my 94 5.0 seem like a turd.

My 2011 5.0 is vastly superior in every category except it is heavier. I get a kick out of people who are not a fan of the new GT because it is marketed and badged as a "5.0"

Kinda like when I took my 03 Cobra to car shows and some people would try to convince me it was inferior to older 5.0s because it only had a 4.6...OKAY

Ford probably should have done a better job marketing the 4.6 when they transitioned from the original 5.0 because a lot of people are still confused.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Oct 19, 2010
#12
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #12
I changed my sig
 

1wildGT

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
1,026
6
38
Abilene TX
Oct 19, 2010
#13
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #13
Is that better?
 

1wildGT

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
1,026
6
38
Abilene TX
Oct 19, 2010
#14
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #14
jaybertx said:
Well, if we're going to get technical... since the Windsor was only 4.9L, shouldn't that be "there is FINALLY a 5.0 in the stang"?
Click to expand...

+1
 

1wildGT

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
1,026
6
38
Abilene TX
Oct 19, 2010
#15
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #15
Burns331 said:
I’m not a fan of people saying the 5.0 is back.
Click to expand...

Is that why you ordered a CS?

So you wouldn't have to look at the 5.0 badge?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Oct 19, 2010
#16
  • Oct 19, 2010
  • #16
So what? The new hemi has nothing in common with the old hemis and yet dodge is riding that train for all it's worth.
 

04GreyGtUSAF

Member
Dec 10, 2007
43
0
7
KS
Oct 20, 2010
#17
  • Oct 20, 2010
  • #17
1wildGT said:
My 2011 3.7 makes my 94 5.0 seem like a turd.

My 2011 5.0 is vastly superior in every category except it is heavier. I get a kick out of people who are not a fan of the new GT because it is marketed and badged as a "5.0"

Kinda like when I took my 03 Cobra to car shows and some people would try to convince me it was inferior to older 5.0s because it only had a 4.6...OKAY

Ford probably should have done a better job marketing the 4.6 when they transitioned from the original 5.0 because a lot of people are still confused.
Click to expand...

+1 on the 4.6 point. That engine doesnt get the credit it deserves. That engine made the 'poor mans sports car' a reality for what, 15 years?

I think saying the 5.0 is back is a good connection for older generation mustang owners and younger ones. The late 80s fox body is my favorite style of stang, I have never owned a fox body 5.0 but the nastalgia connected with it isnt a bad thing. My dad recently took delivery of my '11(which I cannot wait to get home and drive) and the 5.0 badge is a point of pride for where the mustang was and is going.

Just my 2cents
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Oct 20, 2010
#18
  • Oct 20, 2010
  • #18
04GreyGtUSAF said:
+1 on the 4.6 point. That engine doesnt get the credit it deserves. That engine made the 'poor mans sports car' a reality for what, 15 years?
Click to expand...

I wouldnt quite say 15 years...first few were dogs..First one REALLY was a dog But Ford took their first one improved on it and made a pretty nice car for what it had. (they worked well with forced induction) I actually still to this day prefer the sound of the 4.6 with exhaust and have been trying to find exhaust for my new 2011 that has a similar tone..(steedas so far).

As far as the "4.9L" issue goes, it's AWESOME how Ford managed to squeeze out another 180 ponies out of 0.1 cubes
RC
 
B

Burns331

Member
Jun 12, 2010
107
0
16
Oct 20, 2010
#19
  • Oct 20, 2010
  • #19
jaybertx said:
Well, if we're going to get technical... since the Windsor was only 4.9L, shouldn't that be "there is FINALLY a 5.0 in the stang"?
Click to expand...


Thats more like it.
 
B

Burns331

Member
Jun 12, 2010
107
0
16
Oct 20, 2010
#20
  • Oct 20, 2010
  • #20
94GTLaserRC said:
As far as the "4.9L" issue goes, it's AWESOME how Ford managed to squeeze out another 180 ponies out of 0.1 cubes
RC
Click to expand...

.1 liters lol but i get what you mean
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Engine Idle cuts out
  • claypoolxx
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
783
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 24, 2026
alutwon
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
594
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
274
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
W
Megasquirt base tune for 94 5.0
  • wrx757
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
220
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2026
wrx757
W
G
1991 GT 5.0 running hot
  • gvanginkel403
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
153
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?