• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

opinions for an intake combo...

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonfor
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2009

jonfor

New Member
Apr 20, 2009
59
0
0
Columbus, GA
May 21, 2009
#1
  • May 21, 2009
  • #1
i need a new intake and carb and thought i would solicit advice from those who have it to give. my engine is an 87 HO engine with a 93 mustang cam and a C4. goal is cruiser that will seldom see a track and maybe eventually +250hp to the rear tires. i would like the best bang for the buck with $400-600 and i know i want an electric choke with vac secondaries. i like the "look" of the old holley carbs without all the shiny. i have a stock hood so height might be an issue. i would definitely consider a package set from like summit racing.

any thoughts??
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
May 21, 2009
#2
  • May 21, 2009
  • #2
jonfor said:
i need a new intake and carb and thought i would solicit advice from those who have it to give. my engine is an 87 HO engine with a 93 mustang cam and a C4. goal is cruiser that will seldom see a track and maybe eventually +250hp to the rear tires. i would like the best bang for the buck with $400-600 and i know i want an electric choke with vac secondaries. i like the "look" of the old holley carbs without all the shiny. i have a stock hood so height might be an issue. i would definitely consider a package set from like summit racing.

any thoughts??
Click to expand...

i would say go with a dual plane set up, like a Edelbrock Performer RPM airgap or not and a 600-620 cfm Holley with vacuum secondaries.

there are other dual plane intakes that i am not specifically familiar with. but keep in mind the intake and carb aren't going to net you any spectacular numbers compared to new heads n stuff. but you should feel a nice kick in the butt dyno
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 21, 2009
#3
  • May 21, 2009
  • #3
Ford Racing A321 intake, topped with a Holley list 80783 650 cfm carb. Electric choke? I doubt you need it. With a good electronic ignition this setup needs no choke even down to 25*F, provided you tune the carb and ignition correctly. The carb lists for $355 thru Summit, the intake is about $200 (new)
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
May 22, 2009
#4
  • May 22, 2009
  • #4
I run a modified 289 high rise dual plane repop cobra manifold with a holley 650 hp with mechanical secondaries. it all fits under my 66 hood with shelby scoop. could not me happier with the performance. starts every time, hot or cold. however everything under the intake is top shelf.
hope this helps
 

jonfor

New Member
Apr 20, 2009
59
0
0
Columbus, GA
May 22, 2009
#5
  • May 22, 2009
  • #5
D.Hearne said:
Ford Racing A321 intake, topped with a Holley list 80783 650 cfm carb. Electric choke? I doubt you need it. With a good electronic ignition this setup needs no choke even down to 25*F, provided you tune the carb and ignition correctly. The carb lists for $355 thru Summit, the intake is about $200 (new)
Click to expand...

got a source for the intake? i had one a few months ago and i sold it without knowing i was going to buy this mustang. the one i sold was cast in '69 as an OTC part. i'll try to get it back.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
May 22, 2009
#6
  • May 22, 2009
  • #6
For the carb, I would suggest a Holley Street Avenger. This carb runs really well right out of the box and is a performance oriented vac secondary carb. Meaning you can re-jet both primaries and secondaries, tune when the secondaries kick in by easily swapping springs etc. I have used a couple of different Holley's, but they were pretty fussy to get dialed in. The SA I have now works very nicely. You can marry this carb with whatever intake makes sense for your engine.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 22, 2009
#7
  • May 22, 2009
  • #7
I usually recommend an Edelbrock carb and manifold, or the Cobra manifold for nostalgia. Funny, it's within a few percent at high end, compared with modern manifolds. Those slide-rule guys back when were pretty sharp. I don't go down memory lane far enough to use Holleys; after 15 years on my daily driver, I've done my time. Besides, the Edelbrock is the Carter AFB (Aluminum Four Barrel), which has been around longer than the Mustang.

View attachment 256977
 
H

htwheelz67

Member
May 18, 2007
444
0
16
mission viejo ca.
May 22, 2009
#8
  • May 22, 2009
  • #8
if it has stock heads etc.......an air gap wont do a thing for you. I would suggest a Weiand stealth intake or a weiand 8124 (a little milder) use a speed demon 575 vs carb, preferrably with annular boosters as it will add low end tq and throttle response. You can get reman demons on ebay for a good price, I have found them to be even better than new ones.

Edelbrock carbs run great but dont make the power of holleys, holleys are fine but unless you buy an HP series holley you get much more for your money with a demon and even so when you take a holley hp and a mighty demon (the same league) the demon usually always out performs the holley. In my case I bought a 750.00 prosystems custom made to my 408 950hp holley, then I bought a mighty demon 750 annular reman off ebay for 425.00 and right out of the box it ran way better from idle to max rpm.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 22, 2009
#9
  • May 22, 2009
  • #9
jonfor said:
got a source for the intake? i had one a few months ago and i sold it without knowing i was going to buy this mustang. the one i sold was cast in '69 as an OTC part. i'll try to get it back.
Click to expand...

Sorry, no source right off hand. Edelbrocks old F4B was the same, as was your old one, the C9OX. The Shelby "Cobra" high rise is another version. The 80783 is about the only Holley left in the old zinc-chromate finish. The 3310 is offered with it, but a bit big for a 302. I'm running an A321 on an Explorer level (same in all respects except has ported E7's) roller 5.0 topped with a 570 SA Holley. Great combo in my 89 Ranger with a Toploader 4 speed and 3.73 rear. If you can't get ahold of these intakes, next I'd go with is a Performer RPM Airgap. You'll get the same bottomend as the low rise dual planes, but leave room up top for upgrades. (this is true for all the highrise dual planes)
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
May 22, 2009
#10
  • May 22, 2009
  • #10
htwheelz67 said:
if it has stock heads etc.......an air gap wont do a thing for you.
Click to expand...

If you don't port-match the stock iron heads to your exhaust, all of our advice is wasted. The iron 289/302 had pitiful undersize exhaust ports, even the 289HP heads. The good news is it's easy.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
May 23, 2009
#11
  • May 23, 2009
  • #11
The best intake I've ever used for a small block was an old Offenhauser Port-O-Sonic. It's an open-plenum manifold, and I don't think they're made anymore, but it made killer midrange on an basically stock motor. But the Edelbrock F4B intake is also a good one, as it's basically a copy of the old Cobra intake. If you're married to the idea of an electric choke, Holley makes a good 600cfm, vacuum secondary one that works well with this manifold. I'm not too crazy about the E-brock/Carter carbs, but I think that's more personal preference than anything.
 

jonfor

New Member
Apr 20, 2009
59
0
0
Columbus, GA
May 23, 2009
#12
  • May 23, 2009
  • #12
thanks for all the responses. i got out the magic 8-ball this morning, shook it up, and it said: holley SA 570cfm and a standard edlebrock rpm. so for better or worse, that's what i ordered.
 
C

countryboy116

New Member
May 18, 2009
10
0
0
May 23, 2009
#13
  • May 23, 2009
  • #13
those should match your combo quite well
 
H

htwheelz67

Member
May 18, 2007
444
0
16
mission viejo ca.
May 23, 2009
#14
  • May 23, 2009
  • #14
I agree..........
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 23, 2009
#15
  • May 23, 2009
  • #15
Yea, that'll do too.
 

jonfor

New Member
Apr 20, 2009
59
0
0
Columbus, GA
May 27, 2009
#16
  • May 27, 2009
  • #16
today UPS brought this:

View attachment 256309
View attachment 256310

to replace this:
View attachment 256311

from the rough measurements, with a drop base, it's still 1/2" shorter set-up too. are low profile edelbrock intakes worth anything other than recycle value?

also got some of this:
 
C

countryboy116

New Member
May 18, 2009
10
0
0
May 27, 2009
#17
  • May 27, 2009
  • #17
ooooooooo new parts those should work well on your motor the performer rpm is a hell of an intake in my opinion for a basically stock to mild build
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 28, 2009
#18
  • May 28, 2009
  • #18
jonfor said:
to replace this:
View attachment 256269
are low profile edelbrock intakes worth anything other than recycle value?
Click to expand...

If you want a quick sale for the Performer intake give me a PM. I know someone that's looking for one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
110
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
772
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
224
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
S
Need a clutch, 1982 Capri RS 5.0 owner, am I allowed to participate?
  • scudzuki
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
529
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?