• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

orange painted block

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spanish Dave
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2004
S

Spanish Dave

Member
Apr 23, 2003
147
1
18
Oliva, Valencia, Spain
Jan 23, 2004
#1
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #1
I have just pulled the motor out and stripped it down (1965 289) ... behind the flywheel it is painted bright orange which looks original ... in fact the whole motor shows traces of orange paint. I thought the 289 was either black or a couple of different shades of blue ... any ideas
 
1

1973mach1

Member
May 19, 2003
457
0
16
PA
Jan 23, 2004
#2
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #2
Spanish Dave said:
I have just pulled the motor out and stripped it down (1965 289) ... behind the flywheel it is painted bright orange which looks original ... in fact the whole motor shows traces of orange paint. I thought the 289 was either black or a couple of different shades of blue ... any ideas
Click to expand...


I think I have heard early 289's and ford blocks in general in the early 60's were orange? Not sure though.

Jim
 

SuperDave

Early-Model Mentor
Founding Member
May 3, 2000
6,361
0
0
Tacoma, WA USA
Jan 23, 2004
#3
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #3
A '65 block and heads are correctly BLACK (not blue or orange). You may paint them any color you wish.
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 23, 2004
#4
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #4
Somebody just painted them orange... its not a Ford color. You can now paint them any color you wish...
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Jan 23, 2004
#5
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #5
most orange motors I see are chebbies..... :0
 
6

65shelby

New Member
Aug 26, 2003
42
0
0
Jan 24, 2004
#6
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #6
289hp?

I think I read that the 289HP was painted orange in that general area. A look at the main bearing caps can confirm this. If they are beefier than the normal 289, you have a 289 HP.
 

SuperDave

Early-Model Mentor
Founding Member
May 3, 2000
6,361
0
0
Tacoma, WA USA
Jan 24, 2004
#7
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #7
Don't mean to parse but there was never a 289 cubic inch rated at 289 horsepower. Hi-Po 289's were rated at 306 HP.
 
M

mr-fixit

Founding Member
Jul 19, 1999
466
0
17
Malvern,Pa.
Jan 24, 2004
#8
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #8
SuperDave said:
Don't mean to parse but there was never a 289 cubic inch rated at 289 horsepower. Hi-Po 289's were rated at 306 HP.
Click to expand...
Actually they were rated at 271 HP from Ford. Shelby rated them 306 H P after installing Tri-Y headers, aluminum intake and larger carb.
 
S

Spanish Dave

Member
Apr 23, 2003
147
1
18
Oliva, Valencia, Spain
Jan 24, 2004
#9
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #9
I guess by getting the average of the 2 figures (271 & 306) we get 288.5 hp which is just about 289 .... the numbers fit really well !!
What I think 65shelby meant by 289HP was not 289 horsepower ... but 289 Hi-Po.
I will take and post a pic of the block tomorrow as it looks quite an original finish to me. BTW has anyone got any measurements of these main caps on the Hi-Po that are *beefier* than stock. It may be obvious to someone who has seen dissembled plenty of small block Ford motors ... but I haven't.
 
M

mr-fixit

Founding Member
Jul 19, 1999
466
0
17
Malvern,Pa.
Jan 24, 2004
#10
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #10
Is is really orange, or more a red oxide color, similar to the color of the rear center section ( or "pumpkin")?
 

P_T_Bishop

New Member
Jan 9, 2004
190
0
0
Vancouver WA
Jan 24, 2004
#11
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #11
Ford didnt paint any of there blocks or heads orange. early 289s were painted red as well as blue, this may not be the stock engine for the car.
 

SuperDave

Early-Model Mentor
Founding Member
May 3, 2000
6,361
0
0
Tacoma, WA USA
Jan 24, 2004
#12
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #12
mr-fixit said:
Actually they were rated at 271 HP from Ford. Shelby rated them 306 H P after installing Tri-Y headers, aluminum intake and larger carb.
Click to expand...

I realize the difference but I was responding to "65Shelby" hence I stated Shelby numbers.
 
6

65shelby

New Member
Aug 26, 2003
42
0
0
Jan 24, 2004
#13
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #13
SuperDave said:
I realize the difference but I was responding to "65Shelby" hence I stated Shelby numbers.
Click to expand...

Yes, I was referring to the 289 High Performance engine, when I said "289HP". In case you were wondering, I saw the reference to the orange paint in the book titled "How to rebuild you small block Ford" It's in chapter 3 I think, "Parts Identification and Interchange".
 
S

Spanish Dave

Member
Apr 23, 2003
147
1
18
Oliva, Valencia, Spain
Jan 25, 2004
#14
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #14
I have taken a pic to show the colour block.jpg .....
block1.jpg
.... I mean it's no big deal if someone has painted the block at sometime ... it is just that they seem to have done a really good job of it so it looks to me original. The guy the car came off said he thought it may be a Hi-Po engine (it had 351W heads fitted too). Is there any other way of checking the block out other than measuring these *beefier* mains ... which I have no exact dimensions for ?
I have also attached a pic of one of the cracked pistons (the worst one).
cracked piston
 
S

Spanish Dave

Member
Apr 23, 2003
147
1
18
Oliva, Valencia, Spain
Jan 25, 2004
#15
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #15
.
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Jan 25, 2004
#16
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #16
Spanish Dave said:
I have taken a pic to show the colour block.jpg .....
block1.jpg
.... I mean it's no big deal if someone has painted the block at sometime ... it is just that they seem to have done a really good job of it so it looks to me original. The guy the car came off said he thought it may be a Hi-Po engine (it had 351W heads fitted too). Is there any other way of checking the block out other than measuring these *beefier* mains ... which I have no exact dimensions for ?
I have also attached a pic of one of the cracked pistons (the worst one).
cracked piston
Click to expand...

If its a Hi-Po the crankshaft will have the markings "1M", as do all 289's, but there will be a "K" stamped close by... The crankshaft is actually the same as for all other 289s, its just been Brinell tested for toughness and does have heavier main bearing caps. The harmonic balancer is also beefier and is 3 37/64" total width and 6/12" diameter.

The 289 Hi-Po used a unique head design, with easily identifiable valve spring pockets, screw-in studs, and a "double dot 289" cast (2 dots ove the 289). It didn't use 351 heads. Somebody has added those heads later.

Hope this give a couple of things to look for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
468
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
436
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?