• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

performance mods

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlangholzj
  • Start date Start date Jul 27, 2008

jlangholzj

Mustang Master
Oct 23, 2006
248
31
93
MI
Jul 27, 2008
#1
  • Jul 27, 2008
  • #1
well....not quite

I'm thinking of adding a spacer between the 600 holley and the eddelbrock RPM intake.

my question is, what size should i put in, 1", 2" etc. I'll take a look today and see what kind of clearance I have.

thanks

john
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Jul 27, 2008
#2
  • Jul 27, 2008
  • #2
I'd just go with the 1/2" spacer for heat seperation. You may gain 1 or 2 HP with a larger spacer, but it'll hurt you on the low end.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jul 27, 2008
#3
  • Jul 27, 2008
  • #3
i agree, just some kind of short phenolic spacer and that's it
 

jlangholzj

Mustang Master
Oct 23, 2006
248
31
93
MI
Jul 27, 2008
#4
  • Jul 27, 2008
  • #4
i heard that it was supposed to extend the powerband....much like a highrise. but was i just fed a bunce of BS?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 27, 2008
#5
  • Jul 27, 2008
  • #5
the thing about spacers is they can add power, if you get the right one for your engine. i have seen 4 hole spacers add high rpm power, and i have seen open spacers add low end power. how much? about 3-5hp at best on most engines. like bnickle said use a 1/2" thick phenolic spacer to insulate the carb from the intake.
 

jlangholzj

Mustang Master
Oct 23, 2006
248
31
93
MI
Jul 27, 2008
#6
  • Jul 27, 2008
  • #6
this might help with my issue when the car gets warmer too....
 

calpolymustang

Member
Feb 1, 2004
217
0
16
Santa Rosa, CA
Jul 29, 2008
#7
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #7
I have yet to see a phenolic version, but I've always liked this style spacer:

 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jul 29, 2008
#8
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #8
I used to have a "spacer" like that on a past hot rod. Not a great street manifold, but it sure looked great.
 
B

BornInAFord

Member
Apr 22, 2005
199
0
17
Bend, OR 97701
Jul 29, 2008
#9
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #9
You can get a 1/2" spacer like the ones from Summit to fit for sure. I'm not sure about an inch one. When I was running a Stealth (which is slightly lower than the RPM), I could use a 1" spacer under the hood of my 66, but had to cut a little off the air cleaner stud and use a flat wing-nut. Currently my Torker 289 has a 1"spacer, too, but I had to use a 1/2" drop bracket for my RMP motor mounts to clear the hood.

Spacers are used as a tuning aid and can bump up or down the useable range. I normally think of 4 hole spacers as for improving the low end and open spacers as for the top end. The reason is that the 4 hole increases air velocity through the venturis and improves carburetor signal and airflow direction (most carburetor's throttle plates aim the air towards the back of the engine, so even a small extension below the plates helps to straighten out flow. The open spacer helps in upper RPMS by increasing plenum volume, by allowing a more gentle curve for the air flow to follow into the ports and by increasing the sharing of all 4 barrels for the whole engine (the RPM already has a cutout at the top of the divider for this purpose, so you just add to this). Different camshafts and carburetor/head/exhaust combos can change the engine dynamics quite a bit, so what works (open vs 4 hole and 1/2" vs 1" vs 2") for one engine may have quite a different effect on another. That's why what I just said is different (but often just as true) from what was stated by previous posters.

Spacers are a cheap and easy to install tuning aid (~$30 at Summit), so you can play around with a few and see what each does... Just clay the air cleaner (or use wadded aluminum foil) to see if you have clearance before you shut the hood.

Daniel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
635
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 10:27 PM
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
642
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
199
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?