Pics of 5.0 emblems replaced with running horse?

glowstang93 said:

Top to bottom is 2 24/32", from horses mouth to tail is 3" if they were in the same horizontal plane, and the width of the bars is 25/32".

Like I said before, I bought them from Ford in 1994, they were stock pieces on 1994. I think they make it more Mustangier than no emblems on the outside, but to each his own.

Click to expand...

Those look really good on there.

IMO, nothing looks better than the 5.0 emblem in that position, of course on cars that came with them. glowstang your car is so clean i wish more 2.3 cars were cared for the way yours has been all these years. the pony does look great on there, too. when i had my 2.3 turbo car, i had 2.3 emblems that were styled like the 5.0 emblem

The only emblem i *might* consider in place of the 5.0 is the 2005+ GT emblem (only on a GT of course) but then again I only like them on certian colors, etc. The whole look has to be right, and different emblems can easily look out of place

my 2.3 turbo car with the 2.3 badges



macn89blkstng's 89 GT (RIP) with the 2005+ badges

What about the pony with no bars behind it? Just the running pony.

The 5.0 emblem should stay in my opinion.....

SickSix said:

The 5.0 emblem should stay in my opinion.....

Click to expand...

I took my 5.0 emblems off, planning on replacing them but started to like the look without them




now people always think its a 4 cyl. though,,, unless they hear it run



---

QUICK91LX said:

Click to expand...

That badge looks pretty good on there, I would put some on if I increased my displacement.

Has anyone ever done body color "5.0" badges? Or just paint the chrome and leave the black outline.




.

Some bozo painted...PAINTED!!! 302 onto my car, its not coming off either but I wish it would.

heres 05+ badges