Nice ride. I like the '06's a lot and I wasn't crazy about the '04's.
When I saw the pics, I said "That's got to be the Bay Area", and sure enough...
ya, and what would his GTO put down w/ stage 4+ cams? when the LS2 adds heads/cams/intake, you'll be eating shiit even if you're blown.
the difference between having class and being an ass. Good on ya Smeech, enjoy the Goat, they're very decent imo.This is interesting. I never gloated that the LS2 is the best motor ever. I never compared it to a 5.4L 3V... Bill, I have a ton of respect for what you have done and am impressed with your #s...I always have been.
no i''m not kidding. to say he has 100 rwhp more is absurd. he has factory ~340 rwhp. not 1 hp more. and also 340rwtq. AS A MANUAL. i selected f;ywheel for a reason. my auto loses more torque percentage to the wheels than his 6 speed. i make ~410 - 415 flywheel torque. that's more than him factory. like it or not...
i have more FLYWHEEL torqur than he does. his 364 cu.in is weak. weak weak weak !!!!
i will make more than 400 flywheel before i'm throug, and i won't lose 1 lb-ft in the process!!!
a 2005 4.6 3v with stage 3 cams makes 332 rwtq. that's only ~8-10 less than his useless 6.0l LS. btw that same 4.6 3v makes 345rwhp. which is also more than that stupid LS. i will make more, not "i think i will make more". a 5hitload more.
when i add stage 4+ custom cams expect 380rwtq or more from me. i was right about my expectation at the dyno, and i'm right about what i will get next time.
LS lovers eat crap.
Please, put down the Ford kool-aid. You are comparing a modded 5.4 to a STOCK LS2. The 5.4 3v doesn't even come in the Mustang for goodness sake. Who cares if the LS2 has 1000ci -- it's lighter, more compact, makes more power, has ONE cam and only 2-valves.....most importantly, they come in the GTO STOCK.If there are any doubts as to the potential of a stock longblock LS2, check this out - http://www.turboconnectionracing.com/forum1/viewtopic.php?t=2

Well, SRT-4 is just fugry top to bottm. Period.Really? I like the stock 18s... they remind me of the Mustang 18s that are stock now, but better. Or are you talking about the SRT-4?
no i''m not kidding. to say he has 100 rwhp more is absurd. he has factory ~340 rwhp. not 1 hp more. and also 340rwtq. AS A MANUAL. i selected f;ywheel for a reason. my auto loses more torque percentage to the wheels than his 6 speed. i make ~410 - 415 flywheel torque. that's more than him factory. like it or not...
i have more FLYWHEEL torqur than he does. his 364 cu.in is weak. weak weak weak !!!!
i will make more than 400 flywheel before i'm throug, and i won't lose 1 lb-ft in the process!!!
a 2005 4.6 3v with stage 3 cams makes 332 rwtq. that's only ~8-10 less than his useless 6.0l LS. btw that same 4.6 3v makes 345rwhp. which is also more than that stupid LS. i will make more, not "i think i will make more". a 5hitload more.
when i add stage 4+ custom cams expect 380rwtq or more from me. i was right about my expectation at the dyno, and i'm right about what i will get next time.
LS lovers eat crap.
that's what get you movingya, and what would his GTO put down w/ stage 4+ cams? when the LS2 adds heads/cams/intake, you'll be eating shiit even if you're blown.
This is interesting. I never gloated that the LS2 is the best motor ever. I never compared it to a 5.4L 3V... Bill, I have a ton of respect for what you have done and am impressed with your #s...I always have been.
Also keep in mind I am in California. A Mustang GT with Stage 3 cams will be pretty damn hard to find. But, because of the simplicity of the swap (in comparison), there are quite a few LSs around here with cams...
Yes, we were blessed with a mostly sunny day yesterday.![]()
i can also add 4v heads , etc and his stupid LS still loses. or i add a 460 tunnel ram. the point is that an ls2 is not god. it flows a set amount of air that can easily be equaled. you guys are buying that crap.
I MA 90% stock. and i out torque a motor that is 34 cu.in. larger. if you knew what you were talking about, you will now slap yourself in the face.
ported ls2= 312 cfm
ported 4v = 320 cfm. they don't have crap. AND HE WILL STILL WIEGH 500LBS MORE
i said the day i entered this forum i wil lexceed the stupid LS. if not with this motor, then with a 7 LITER BOSS/HURRICANE.
you guys are really poor chevy boys. you can't afford a chevy so you 'settled' for a stang. get the hell out of your stang and drive a honda. you aren't good enough to appreciate the history you are driving. if you don't know chevy sucks you never will.

most of us are smart enough to realize that Ford doesnt make the best engines on the face of the planet. the LS1/LS2/LS6 kicks the shiit out of our crappy 2Vs, 4Vs, and even your 5.4L. learn to accept it. We know the history of the Mustang. you just forget that Chevy has equally a similar history/tradition. i can also add 4v heads , etc and his stupid LS still loses. or i add a 460 tunnel ram. the point is that an ls2 is not god. it flows a set amount of air that can easily be equaled. you guys are buying that crap.
I MA 90% stock. and i out torque a motor that is 34 cu.in. larger. if you knew what you were talking about, you will now slap yourself in the face.
ported ls2= 312 cfm
ported 4v = 320 cfm. they don't have crap. AND HE WILL STILL WIEGH 500LBS MORE
i said the day i entered this forum i wil lexceed the stupid LS. if not with this motor, then with a 7 LITER BOSS/HURRICANE.
you guys are really poor chevy boys. you can't afford a chevy so you 'settled' for a stang. get the hell out of your stang and drive a honda. you aren't good enough to appreciate the history you are driving. if you don't know chevy sucks you never will.
.) And this is all with just 2 valves. But head flow is just but one of the MANY aspects involved in evaluating a cylinder head's potential. There are quite a few LS7 motors out there (HPE, C Motorsports, and LG Motorsports) approaching 650 RWHP completely naturally aspirated. Sure it's 427 inches, but nonetheless, still impressive. you can't afford a chevy so you 'settled' for a stang. get the hell out of your stang and drive a honda. you aren't good enough to appreciate the history you are driving. if you don't know chevy sucks you never will.

i never knew engines swaps were considered stock.