Nice ride. I like the '06's a lot and I wasn't crazy about the '04's.
When I saw the pics, I said "That's got to be the Bay Area", and sure enough...
ya, and what would his GTO put down w/ stage 4+ cams? when the LS2 adds heads/cams/intake, you'll be eating shiit even if you're blown.
the difference between having class and being an ass. Good on ya Smeech, enjoy the Goat, they're very decent imo.This is interesting. I never gloated that the LS2 is the best motor ever. I never compared it to a 5.4L 3V... Bill, I have a ton of respect for what you have done and am impressed with your #s...I always have been.
no i''m not kidding. to say he has 100 rwhp more is absurd. he has factory ~340 rwhp. not 1 hp more. and also 340rwtq. AS A MANUAL. i selected f;ywheel for a reason. my auto loses more torque percentage to the wheels than his 6 speed. i make ~410 - 415 flywheel torque. that's more than him factory. like it or not...
i have more FLYWHEEL torqur than he does. his 364 cu.in is weak. weak weak weak !!!!
i will make more than 400 flywheel before i'm throug, and i won't lose 1 lb-ft in the process!!!
a 2005 4.6 3v with stage 3 cams makes 332 rwtq. that's only ~8-10 less than his useless 6.0l LS. btw that same 4.6 3v makes 345rwhp. which is also more than that stupid LS. i will make more, not "i think i will make more". a 5hitload more.
when i add stage 4+ custom cams expect 380rwtq or more from me. i was right about my expectation at the dyno, and i'm right about what i will get next time.
LS lovers eat crap.
If there are any doubts as to the potential of a stock longblock LS2, check this out - http://www.turboconnectionracing.com/forum1/viewtopic.php?t=2
Well, SRT-4 is just fugry top to bottm. Period.Really? I like the stock 18s... they remind me of the Mustang 18s that are stock now, but better. Or are you talking about the SRT-4?
no i''m not kidding. to say he has 100 rwhp more is absurd. he has factory ~340 rwhp. not 1 hp more. and also 340rwtq. AS A MANUAL. i selected f;ywheel for a reason. my auto loses more torque percentage to the wheels than his 6 speed. i make ~410 - 415 flywheel torque. that's more than him factory. like it or not...
i have more FLYWHEEL torqur than he does. his 364 cu.in is weak. weak weak weak !!!!
i will make more than 400 flywheel before i'm throug, and i won't lose 1 lb-ft in the process!!!
a 2005 4.6 3v with stage 3 cams makes 332 rwtq. that's only ~8-10 less than his useless 6.0l LS. btw that same 4.6 3v makes 345rwhp. which is also more than that stupid LS. i will make more, not "i think i will make more". a 5hitload more.
when i add stage 4+ custom cams expect 380rwtq or more from me. i was right about my expectation at the dyno, and i'm right about what i will get next time.
LS lovers eat crap.
ya, and what would his GTO put down w/ stage 4+ cams? when the LS2 adds heads/cams/intake, you'll be eating shiit even if you're blown.
This is interesting. I never gloated that the LS2 is the best motor ever. I never compared it to a 5.4L 3V... Bill, I have a ton of respect for what you have done and am impressed with your #s...I always have been.
Also keep in mind I am in California. A Mustang GT with Stage 3 cams will be pretty damn hard to find. But, because of the simplicity of the swap (in comparison), there are quite a few LSs around here with cams...
Yes, we were blessed with a mostly sunny day yesterday.
i can also add 4v heads , etc and his stupid LS still loses. or i add a 460 tunnel ram. the point is that an ls2 is not god. it flows a set amount of air that can easily be equaled. you guys are buying that crap.
I MA 90% stock. and i out torque a motor that is 34 cu.in. larger. if you knew what you were talking about, you will now slap yourself in the face.
ported ls2= 312 cfm
ported 4v = 320 cfm. they don't have crap. AND HE WILL STILL WIEGH 500LBS MORE
i said the day i entered this forum i wil lexceed the stupid LS. if not with this motor, then with a 7 LITER BOSS/HURRICANE.
you guys are really poor chevy boys. you can't afford a chevy so you 'settled' for a stang. get the hell out of your stang and drive a honda. you aren't good enough to appreciate the history you are driving. if you don't know chevy sucks you never will.
i can also add 4v heads , etc and his stupid LS still loses. or i add a 460 tunnel ram. the point is that an ls2 is not god. it flows a set amount of air that can easily be equaled. you guys are buying that crap.
I MA 90% stock. and i out torque a motor that is 34 cu.in. larger. if you knew what you were talking about, you will now slap yourself in the face.
ported ls2= 312 cfm
ported 4v = 320 cfm. they don't have crap. AND HE WILL STILL WIEGH 500LBS MORE
i said the day i entered this forum i wil lexceed the stupid LS. if not with this motor, then with a 7 LITER BOSS/HURRICANE.
you guys are really poor chevy boys. you can't afford a chevy so you 'settled' for a stang. get the hell out of your stang and drive a honda. you aren't good enough to appreciate the history you are driving. if you don't know chevy sucks you never will.
you can't afford a chevy so you 'settled' for a stang. get the hell out of your stang and drive a honda. you aren't good enough to appreciate the history you are driving. if you don't know chevy sucks you never will.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?