• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Piston selection for about 10:1 compr.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tim65GT
  • Start date Start date Oct 14, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 17, 2007
#21
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #21
Shouldn't be any intake fitment problems after milling an 8.229 deck block. The mill will bring it down to what it would be on any other 302 block.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Oct 17, 2007
#22
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #22
by SoCalCruising:
Since you will be decking the block, you will be changing the mounting position of the intake - the intake will sit higher on the heads than with the original deck height. So, when you have the heads on during mock-up, mount the intake with a gasket and torque to about 15 ft/lbs. Check the clearance between the block end rails and the intake surface. There is a chance that the intake will mount flush (no space between block end rails and intake). If this is the case, you must have the intake milled.

Many of us use silicone to seal the end rails and this is especially good if the clearance you have is small (e.g., <0.100"). The cork gasket may sit too proud and not allow the intake to seal against the head if you have little clearance and use the cork gasket. If you have lots of clearance, you can use the cork, plus some silicone to get a good seal.

Ideally, you will mock up the shortblock with at least four pistons - one at each corner. Measure the piston-to-deck height at each corner. This is a good idea because the deck may not be square (i.e., not perfectly parallel to and equidistant from the crank mains). You will want to find the shortest piston-to-deck measurement, tell the machine shop how much you want removed from that height, and then tell them you want the decks squared up on that dimension. Frankly, a zero deck is great, but asking for 0.005" will allow a fudge factor and not affect compression very much
Click to expand...

Wow, Thanks for the detailed tips!

I know decking the block or heads affects the Intake mounting, and I'll use your info when I put it together.

AFR 165s and 185s have standard exhaust and intake port positions and bolt patterns, so any header and intake made for the factory head will work. Just be careful when tightening the header bolts into that soft aluminum
Click to expand...

What? No steel inserts? I thought I was getting top of the line stuff.

it will ruin your day if you strip a bolt hole.
Click to expand...

Even more so on brand new $1400 heads!

I'm sure a torque spec sheet comes with 'em, huh? Does it say if you can use thread lock on the header bolts? I've heard copper plus high temp silicone sealer also helps to prevent header leaks.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Oct 18, 2007
#23
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #23
I didn't see a spec. Maybe there's one one their website. I tighten by feel. I get it snug and with enough torque to seal the header - and, yes, I use high temp/copper sealer. Edelbrock heads are the only aluminum heads I know of that come with helicoils in place. Oh well, AFRs make more power. Try tio use a header bolt (length) that gets as much thread as possible into the hole without bottoming out. That's about all you can do.

D.Hearne is correct in that there SHOULD not be an issue with your intake given the piston you want use and the current deck height. However, it is always good to check, and should be a routine part of your mock-up process.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Oct 18, 2007
#24
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #24
In regards to piston weight... it's the same as other reciprocating parts. The piston has to stop and start during every stroke F=MA, so the lower the mass of the piston, the lower the force required to stop/start the piston. If you are building a motor to rev very high, lighter parts are preferred so that the rod bolts and cylinder walls can handle the stress. There are always trade offs - lighter parts cost more. They may be more fragile as well.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 18, 2007
#25
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #25
Tim65GT said:
I'm sure a torque spec sheet comes with 'em, huh? Does it say if you can use thread lock on the header bolts?
Click to expand...

Just me, but thread locking compound on steel bolts in aluminum heads is a bad way to avoid having to retorque your header bolts. Leave em long enough and you WILL need thread inserts after you remove the bolts a few years later. All the bolts that go into any parts that are aluminum I assemble get a dose of anti-seeze compound on the threads.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Oct 19, 2007
#26
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #26
D.Hearne:

Just me, but thread locking compound on steel bolts in aluminum heads is a bad way to avoid having to retorque your header bolts. Leave em long enough and you WILL need thread inserts after you remove the bolts a few years later. All the bolts that go into any parts that are aluminum I assemble get a dose of anti-seeze compound on the threads.
Click to expand...

Good call. I use the antisieze in aluminum too. I read about the thread locking compound somewhere, and that's why I asked. I won't use it. Thanks.

I'm used to checking for loose bolts on a '78 Harley
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Oct 19, 2007
#27
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #27
I know a place where you can get better heads, with better hardware, properly "set up" for a better price. AFR makes a good head, but not the best, even for the price.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Oct 19, 2007
#28
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #28
302 coupe
I know a place where you can get better heads, with better hardware, properly "set up" for a better price. AFR makes a good head, but not the best, even for the price.
Click to expand...


Well....?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Thinking About Buying A Used Engine, Need Advice
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Feb 21, 2014
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2014
84Ttop
B
engine rebuild kits vs. individual pieces AND piston questions
  • bcmbcmbcm
  • Jun 7, 2009
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
920
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2009
bcmbcmbcm
B
  • Locked
accufab TB, GT40/Victor/Brodix heads, N20, SVO R351, Vortec YSI, 83# injtr 306engine
  • VicRattlehead
  • Oct 5, 2010
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
9
Views
4K
Engine and Power Adder Parts Feb 11, 2011
VicRattlehead
vic jr. heads...big enough reliefs?
  • jammer84_03
  • Jun 29, 2008
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
719
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 30, 2008
86bluecobra
8
351W Piston selection...help?
  • samickguy15
  • Oct 2, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 3, 2007
vristang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?