And I never said it was a cost efficient upgrade.
I love the look of our scoop but hate the fake BS part. What are your opinions about doing the shaker system? I couldn't care less if it didn't help the performance if it was at least functional. It does appear that it is less aggressive, which sucks. Not worried about getting more bang for my buck somewhere else. If it were free to you, would you go to the shaker system or stick with the applique?
CDC Mustang Shaker System (99-04 GT) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free shipping!
How can you say, "It may offer a few ponies" but in the next breath say, "but it's hardly a gain"? It's either a gain or it's not. Math is black or white (actually red, but whatever)..there is no gray in between. I never said it was a large gain. And I never said it was a cost efficient upgrade.
At 80mph the Shaker becomes an actual ram air system. So you figure afew horsepower I guess.
Please don't start that debate, as a prior owner of both systems I'll say no. However the airflow/pressure whatever does change around that MPH and you get more fresh air than the bubble allows at lower speeds. RAM AIR doesn't exist on our cars.
http://www.paladinmicro.com/documents/RamAirMyth.pdf
Get a hold of Scott Hoag who helped make the Mach 1 a reality and tell him that. He's the one I'm quoting on that from an article I read afew years ago.
Any shaker pics for the OP?Thanks for the advice btw.
If it were free to me, I'd have one on my car yesterday. The shaker hood is, by leaps and bounds, my favorite thing about the Mach 1s. It just looks so badass.
You really think the designer/seller of a product is going to tell people that the myth that sells said product is a myth?
Seriously, there have been countless debates and experiments that all conclude the shaker is just a super efficient CAI. There's loads of those debates on this forum alone. I don't want to derail the topic any more. I'm not saying the shaker doesn't do anything, I owned both models on the market and loved both of them.
Now tell me their is a debate over the Mach 1 chin spoiler.
How can you say, "It may offer a few ponies" but in the next breath say, "but it's hardly a gain"? It's either a gain or it's not. Math is black or white (actually red, but whatever)..there is no gray in between. I never said it was a large gain. And I never said it was a cost efficient upgrade.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?