Please stop the *56k* titles?

AmBo

Active Member

Feb 3, 2004

1,027

1

36

New Jersey

Jul 24, 2009

#1

• Jul 24, 2009

• #1

It's the ONLY forum I visit where people feel the need to put some 56k warning for their 78k picture. Even IF someone for some sick reason was on a 56k dialup, your picture would STILL load in 1.2 seconds.

So PLEASE stangnet'ers, stop telling me to take a bath, make a sandwich, eat sand and put my kids to sleep.

Sincerely,
The Internet

:SNSign:

 

A

AntiRice98

Member

Dec 6, 2005

158

0

16

Jul 24, 2009

#2

• Jul 24, 2009

• #2

I second that motion....need for those warnings have long passed

 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member

May 20, 2006

1,421

4

39

UCSD/La Jolla

Jul 24, 2009

#3

• Jul 24, 2009

• #3

What i hate is i click on the thread and there's like 7 pictures that could fit on a 13" screen - doesn't even make rational sense

 

B

bdcardinal

tree hugger

Jun 10, 2003

3,612

16

69

santa barbara, CA

Jul 24, 2009

#4

• Jul 24, 2009

• #4

+1 and for those of us with 2 24" monitors those pics look super tiny.

 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

9,390

3,536

233

Jul 24, 2009

#5

• Jul 24, 2009

• #5

I thought in one of the other threads complaining about this issue we talked staff into banning people that post the speed warning.

 

SRT Handz

I tripped & fell down and cut myself & got blood

Oct 10, 2004

941

23

19

La Mirada, CA

Jul 25, 2009

#6

• Jul 25, 2009

• #6

I Once Got Warning violations for posting pics that were too big.....

 

B

BaXTeR3221

Member

Jan 12, 2004

917

0

16

Orange County, NY

Jul 26, 2009

#7

• Jul 26, 2009

• #7

I was thinking this same thing this morning; Are people seriously still using 56K? And if they are, wouldn't they know not to click on a thread full of pictures?

 

stangGT97

New Member

Dec 22, 2004

1,299

1

0

Boston area, MA

Jul 26, 2009

#8

• Jul 26, 2009

• #8

Guilty, but won't do it again