• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Pontiac drops the GTO

  • Thread starter Thread starter tjredgt2000
  • Start date Start date Feb 23, 2006
T

tjredgt2000

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
94
0
0
Feb 23, 2006
#1
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #1
Apparently, its official. The Goat is dead. It may be the wrong brand but I still hate to see it die. 400 hp is a wonderful thing.

http://www.gmplanet.com/pontiac/pontiac_gto_discontinued_1_000604.asp
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Feb 23, 2006
#2
  • Feb 23, 2006
  • #2
Thanks for reading our article!
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Feb 24, 2006
#3
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #3
It's not suprising really. The Monaro in Europe was dropped at the end of last year (no idea about Aus though).

But the platform used for the GTO is quite old and I'm pretty sure is being phased out anyhow.

Plus this all goes to prove that the new Camaro and maybe something else are definatly on their way for 2008. Which will fill the gap quite nicely.

I mean if a new Camaro/Firebird was launched with a 400bhp LS2 it would clash big time with the GTO and one or the other would be to expensive.

As I've said before, I beleive the GTO was a "stop-gap" car for GM to quickly and cheaply re-enter a market segment after the demise of the Fbody. I think this decision only reinforces this view.
 

REDFIRE 05 GT

New Member
Nov 18, 2004
283
0
0
Junction City KS
Feb 24, 2006
#4
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #4
Super nice car, almost bought one, just looks like a big cavaler. The drive train needs to go in a different car. My wife is already drueling over the Camaro pics.
 
B

Berserker

New Member
May 27, 2005
7
0
0
Feb 24, 2006
#5
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #5
If it didn't look like a Taurus/grand-am mating gone wrong it wouldn't be a dead car. I don't care if it's 550 hp looking like that. I still don't know if I've seen one. Certainly NOT a head turner which is sad because the lineage is there for an awesome car.

Critics of the GTO blamed its relatively plain styling and its lack of historic and iconic muscle prompts. It seemed to have the badge, but not the heart of the classic namesake.
Click to expand...
 

Mickey21

New Member
May 10, 2002
43
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 28, 2006
#6
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #6
On the first note, it's sad, another great car is being put under. I really liked the car even with it's bland looks department. Very capable car and not exactly ugly to look at.

On another note, doesnt this make you wonder though? Am I the only one:
"One is an airbag deployment standard that would require some very expensive re-engineering of the car..." How are they currently out of the airbag regulation coming up? Curious.
 
I

I8URVTEC

New Member
Sep 2, 2004
162
0
0
Feb 28, 2006
#7
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #7
I don't think it was slated to run for more than just a few years anyway. I can see why it failed though. It just didn't generate the mass appeal that the GTO name should have.
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Feb 28, 2006
#8
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #8
Berserker said:
If it didn't look like a Taurus/grand-am mating gone wrong it wouldn't be a dead car. I don't care if it's 550 hp looking like that. I still don't know if I've seen one. Certainly NOT a head turner which is sad because the lineage is there for an awesome car.
Click to expand...

I'm with you! good riddance ....


but then I've never seen any GM car the I'd take over a Ford.

 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Mar 1, 2006
#9
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #9
shooterm1 said:
I'm with you! good riddance ....


but then I've never seen any GM car the I'd take over a Ford.
Click to expand...
Yes but you are obviously biased, so why even bother commenting if you don't care??????????????????? A bit self defeating isn't it.
 

Destiny98

Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
904
0
0
ATL
Mar 1, 2006
#10
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #10
shooterm1 said:
I'm with you! good riddance ....


but then I've never seen any GM car the I'd take over a Ford.
Click to expand...

So says a V6 owner
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Mar 1, 2006
#11
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #11
Destiny98 said:
So says a V6 owner
Click to expand...


Brother, if it takes a single dollar away from Ford, its one dollar too many ... !
 
R

Razinhell

New Member
May 29, 2004
62
0
0
Mar 1, 2006
#12
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #12
Actually its not dead its just that the production cycle was only slated for 3 years and about 15K of cars per year.
Heres the link to the 2009 GTO have fun

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=106630
 

MCMustangMan

New Member
Sep 10, 2005
112
0
0
Sterling Heights, Michigan (Detroit Suburb)
Mar 4, 2006
#13
  • Mar 4, 2006
  • #13
I still think GM should have made the first GTO's retro'd to look like the '65 with the headlights straight up and down (hi and lo) and copied the hood scoop and tail lights. I think it was a bit mistake not to go retro when the retro wave was starting to take off! I like the GTO and all of its horse and sleeper qualities, but for a real head turner retro would have been the way to go! After all they had many years that followed the early sixties versions to borrow from to carry on the retro theme. Obviously, GM wasn't listening too hard to the GTO clubs as I know they were screaming to keep the GTO lines intact!
 

Doc GTO

Member
Oct 23, 2004
610
0
16
Ocala, FL
Mar 6, 2006
#14
  • Mar 6, 2006
  • #14
I'll take a 2009 when they come out.
 

Pliskin

New Member
Jul 27, 2004
109
0
0
Mar 6, 2006
#15
  • Mar 6, 2006
  • #15
Repost.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 7, 2006
#16
  • Mar 7, 2006
  • #16
Razinhell said:
Actually its not dead its just that the production cycle was only slated for 3 years and about 15K of cars per year.
Heres the link to the 2009 GTO have fun

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=106630
Click to expand...

Look at the date on the Edmunds article, it's over 7 months old. A lot of things have changed @ GM since then.

Also the original sales target for the GTO was 18,000 and the 3 year run was because there was going to be a new US built GTO for 2007 or 2008 which was canciled.
 
2

2MFF-Z28

New Member
May 1, 2005
30
0
0
Mar 8, 2006
#17
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #17
Destiny98 said:
So says a V6 owner
Click to expand...



Good one. He should have bought the GT so he could give more money to Ford. They are in financial trouble like every other american car Co.

I hate to see good cars die. Pretty soon we'll all drive 4 cyl's and we will drool over the BIG v6's
 
M

mach1dsg

New Member
Sep 28, 2004
84
0
0
Orange County,CA
Mar 8, 2006
#18
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #18
351CJ said:
Look at the date on the Edmunds article, it's over 7 months old. A lot of things have changed @ GM since then.

Also the original sales target for the GTO was 18,000 and the 3 year run was because there was going to be a new US built GTO for 2007 or 2008 which was canciled.
Click to expand...

you might want to read this one then 03/02/2006
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060302/FREE/60302001/1024/LATESTNEWS
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Mar 8, 2006
#19
  • Mar 8, 2006
  • #19
mach1dsg said:
you might want to read this one then 03/02/2006
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060302/FREE/60302001/1024/LATESTNEWS
Click to expand...

They're talking 2-1/2 years from now for production start. A lot can happen or change between now and then. GM has yet to explain how they will be able to use the Camaro name earlier than 2015.

The 09 Mustang update has reportedly slipped to at least the 2010 model year. Don't hold your breath on any future models, both GM & Ford could be bankrupt by then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
884
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
624
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
565
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
J
The Money Pit
  • jessie Clark
  • Sep 14, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
241
The Welcome Wagon Sep 14, 2024
89ripper
K
Electrical charging issue
  • knucklehead11
  • Jul 15, 2024
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
894
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 16, 2024
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?