Critics of the GTO blamed its relatively plain styling and its lack of historic and iconic muscle prompts. It seemed to have the badge, but not the heart of the classic namesake.
Berserker said:If it didn't look like a Taurus/grand-am mating gone wrong it wouldn't be a dead car. I don't care if it's 550 hp looking like that. I still don't know if I've seen one. Certainly NOT a head turner which is sad because the lineage is there for an awesome car.
Yes but you are obviously biased, so why even bother commenting if you don't care??????????????????? A bit self defeating isn't it.shooterm1 said:I'm with you! good riddance ....
but then I've never seen any GM car the I'd take over a Ford.
shooterm1 said:I'm with you! good riddance ....
but then I've never seen any GM car the I'd take over a Ford.
Destiny98 said:So says a V6 owner
Razinhell said:Actually its not dead its just that the production cycle was only slated for 3 years and about 15K of cars per year.
Heres the link to the 2009 GTO have fun
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=106630
Destiny98 said:So says a V6 owner
351CJ said:Look at the date on the Edmunds article, it's over 7 months old. A lot of things have changed @ GM since then.
Also the original sales target for the GTO was 18,000 and the 3 year run was because there was going to be a new US built GTO for 2007 or 2008 which was canciled.
mach1dsg said:you might want to read this one then 03/02/2006
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060302/FREE/60302001/1024/LATESTNEWS
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?