• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Post Pics of Your Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter duner
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • …
  • 142
Next
First Prev 88 of 142 Next Last
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Jan 9, 2010
#1,741
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,741
turn1racing06 said:
Finally got a chance to get the car out of the garage and try the new winter tires out. They are the Michelin X-Ice2 and are a night and day difference between the stock summer tires (obviously!). Before going out I decided to take some quick pictures before getting the car even dirtier.











For V eight


Click to expand...

Some great pics. What a nice looking car...
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
Jan 9, 2010
#1,742
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,742
That black with the snow could be fun picture play.
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Jan 9, 2010
#1,743
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,743
The Fang said:
That black with the snow could be fun picture play.
Click to expand...

Could be fun in the snow, but I think I'd stick to my STi for those snowy days.

With the start of a new job, I'm excited to say that I will soon be in the market for a new 2011 GT. I've been a bit hell-bent on a 2010, but I wanna see a tad more info on the 2011 now.
 

Fast05

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
409
1
0
Corpus Christi, TX
Jan 9, 2010
#1,744
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,744
Top Speed said:
Could be fun in the snow, but I think I'd stick to my STi for those snowy days.

With the start of a new job, I'm excited to say that I will soon be in the market for a new 2011 GT. I've been a bit hell-bent on a 2010, but I wanna see a tad more info on the 2011 now.
Click to expand...

I know you said it was getting heavier, and it is...but it's really only gaining about 100 lbs give or take and that gets you 97 more hp, 67 lb ft of torque, a 6 spd, and brembo brakes. Not bad IMO and still a good 250lbs less than the Camaro.....I want to see 0 - 60 and 1/4 mile times and braking distance and track times. I'm sure it will impress if the underpowered 4.6 can impress.
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Jan 9, 2010
#1,745
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,745
Fast05 said:
I know you said it was getting heavier, and it is...but it's really only gaining about 100 lbs give or take and that gets you 97 more hp, 67 lb ft of torque, a 6 spd, and brembo brakes. Not bad IMO and still a good 250lbs less than the Camaro.....I want to see 0 - 60 and 1/4 mile times and braking distance and track times. I'm sure it will impress if the underpowered 4.6 can impress.
Click to expand...

These domestic companies claim they want to "one-up" the foreign automakers, yet they're going in the wrong direction. Sure, 426 hp may sound good on paper, but when 426 hp is motivating 3900-4000 lbs, it's not all that impressive. Take an LS1 car that weighed about 3400-3500 lbs, and was seriously underrated at 305 hp. They were probably making more along the lines of 350-360 hp. These new Camaros aren't any faster. The power/weight ratio isn't much improved, and if it is improved, the serious lack of aerodynamics negates any type of advantage anyway.

Look at the Nissan 370Z. Sure, IMO it's in a different class than the Mustang, but for some reason, they're considered "competitors." The 370Z LOST nearly 100 lbs, gained more power, and is aesthetically better than the 350Z in every way. The price increase was minimal. Lighter weight and more power make a better car.

There is no reason that a mid-sized sporting machine should weigh 3600 (GT)-4000 lbs (Shelby) as an AWD family car like the Fusion (3800 lbs). There's just no excuse for it. The big, fat Taurus weighs 4300 lbs. It's a full-sized machine, and it only weighs 300 lbs more than a Shelby? I just find that extremely disturbing.

In regards to gas mileage, all these companies claim they're trying to improve upon it. I question what types of engineers are working for these manufacturers. Anyone with a head on their shoulders knows that weight will be a large contributing factor to gas mileage. It's simple physics. Instead, weights continue to go up, then 4 cylinder engines are being stuffed under the hood. These 4 cylinders aren't any better than the V6s they're replacing in terms of gas mileage. The smaller engines are working harder to move these behemoths, which is counter-productive to any sort of fuel mileage gain that may be achieved by their smaller size and efficiency.

IMO, the Mustang needs to shrink down in size, but keep its classic styling. The "big Mustangs" of the very early 70s (1971-1973) were a bit frowned upon, and the way things are going, these ones are also going to be.
 

Fast05

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
409
1
0
Corpus Christi, TX
Jan 9, 2010
#1,746
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,746
Top Speed said:
These domestic companies claim they want to "one-up" the foreign automakers, yet they're going in the wrong direction. Sure, 426 hp may sound good on paper, but when 426 hp is motivating 3900-4000 lbs, it's not all that impressive. Take an LS1 car that weighed about 3400-3500 lbs, and was seriously underrated at 305 hp. They were probably making more along the lines of 350-360 hp. These new Camaros aren't any faster. The power/weight ratio isn't much improved, and if it is improved, the serious lack of aerodynamics negates any type of advantage anyway.

Look at the Nissan 370Z. Sure, IMO it's in a different class than the Mustang, but for some reason, they're considered "competitors." The 370Z LOST nearly 100 lbs, gained more power, and is aesthetically better than the 350Z in every way. The price increase was minimal. Lighter weight and more power make a better car.

There is no reason that a mid-sized sporting machine should weigh 3600 (GT)-4000 lbs (Shelby) as an AWD family car like the Fusion (3800 lbs). There's just no excuse for it. The big, fat Taurus weighs 4300 lbs. It's a full-sized machine, and it only weighs 300 lbs more than a Shelby? I just find that extremely disturbing.

In regards to gas mileage, all these companies claim they're trying to improve upon it. I question what types of engineers are working for these manufacturers. Anyone with a head on their shoulders knows that weight will be a large contributing factor to gas mileage. It's simple physics. Instead, weights continue to go up, then 4 cylinder engines are being stuffed under the hood. These 4 cylinders aren't any better than the V6s they're replacing in terms of gas mileage. The smaller engines are working harder to move these behemoths, which is counter-productive to any sort of fuel mileage gain that may be achieved by their smaller size and efficiency.

IMO, the Mustang needs to shrink down in size, but keep its classic styling. The "big Mustangs" of the very early 70s (1971-1973) were a bit frowned upon, and the way things are going, these ones are also going to be.
Click to expand...

Very true, and impressive what Nissan did with the Z. My parents may be buying one in the next few months, and I'm not up to par with the car, but they're looking at a "sport" version that's 350HP? I saw it on the website when they were researching it. My mom wants it mainly because her dad always had a Z in his driveway...and their anniversary is coming up next month so she can get what she wants. It's down to that or a BMW.

Oh, and FWIW, I know the Mustang is getting bigger, but a Camaro parked next to my car yesterday at work and when I went out to get in mine to leave my car actually looked pretty damn small, that car is a freaking behemoth. I think the Mustang will stay under 3700lbs for a manual coupe...and I also think they just need to throw a blower on top of that new 5.0 for the Shelby...it'd be a lighter motor altogether, and Lord knows that car needs to go on a serious diet and quick, and also get some tires that can hook up for a damn
 
I

iMatt

New Member
Dec 3, 2009
9
0
0
Goldsboro, NC
Jan 9, 2010
#1,747
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,747
kevinmach1 said:
Here is mine, I kinda copied the GT500 theme..

I have lowered it since these pics, it looks much better now..
Click to expand...

Wow, we are almost twins.

View attachment 233928

Recent photoshoot with a friends '04 GT. My copy/paste is not working so I have to manually type everything from PB. So I am not going to post many of them.

Crap it didn't work.
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Jan 9, 2010
#1,748
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,748
Fast05 said:
Very true, and impressive what Nissan did with the Z. My parents may be buying one in the next few months, and I'm not up to par with the car, but they're looking at a "sport" version that's 350HP? I saw it on the website when they were researching it. My mom wants it mainly because her dad always had a Z in his driveway...and their anniversary is coming up next month so she can get what she wants. It's down to that or a BMW.

Oh, and FWIW, I know the Mustang is getting bigger, but a Camaro parked next to my car yesterday at work and when I went out to get in mine to leave my car actually looked pretty damn small, that car is a freaking behemoth. I think the Mustang will stay under 3700lbs for a manual coupe...and I also think they just need to throw a blower on top of that new 5.0 for the Shelby...it'd be a lighter motor altogether, and Lord knows that car needs to go on a serious diet and quick, and also get some tires that can hook up for a damn
Click to expand...

It wasn't long ago I drove a 370Z and fell in love with it, and it's an awesome car. I love everything about it, except for one thing; its overheating problem. Under spirited driving conditions, they overheat. Nissan is well aware of the fact, yet refuses to acknowledge the issue or tend to it. That's not the company I plan on doing business with.

Mustang it is.
 

Fast05

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
409
1
0
Corpus Christi, TX
Jan 9, 2010
#1,749
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,749
Top Speed said:
It wasn't long ago I drove a 370Z and fell in love with it, and it's an awesome car. I love everything about it, except for one thing; its overheating problem. Under spirited driving conditions, they overheat. Nissan is well aware of the fact, yet refuses to acknowledge the issue or tend to it. That's not the company I plan on doing business with.

Mustang it is.
Click to expand...

I've heard that from multiple sources, but I don't know anyone who has one nor have I ever driven one. That's actually quite disappointing. It'd be fine for my parents, god help that car if they ever let me drive it...

Now you have the advantage of waiting to see what's going to happen with the price and performance of next year's Mustang, and if you so wish you could probably pick up a 2010 deeply discounted once the 2011s start hitting lots.
 
T

Top Speed

New Member
Jun 26, 2009
365
0
0
Kearneysville, WV
Jan 9, 2010
#1,750
  • Jan 9, 2010
  • #1,750
Fast05 said:
I've heard that from multiple sources, but I don't know anyone who has one nor have I ever driven one. That's actually quite disappointing. It'd be fine for my parents, god help that car if they ever let me drive it...

Now you have the advantage of waiting to see what's going to happen with the price and performance of next year's Mustang, and if you so wish you could probably pick up a 2010 deeply discounted once the 2011s start hitting lots.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's very disappointing, because the 370Z is a really amazing car for the money. Here's a car that costs $33,000 and will hand a Porsche Cayman its a$$ for $20,000 cheaper.
 
B

bluecar

Member
Feb 19, 2007
99
0
6
SF CA
Jan 10, 2010
#1,751
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #1,751
bluecar said:
I did not quite understand what picture whoring meant. So I went to Urban Dictionary and this is their definition. Urban Dictionary: picture whore I'll start whoring out myself once I get my brother to do a shoot for me.

Happy New Year all!
Click to expand...

Jan 10: Here's my contribution. Just a start.... from my own small camera. Whoring later.







Just south of Santa Rosa. I like the pic in the middle the most.
 
0

07CaliGTStang

New Member
Dec 6, 2009
20
1
0
Maryland
Jan 10, 2010
#1,752
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #1,752
Keep whoring it up guys!!
 
M

mjk

Member
Jun 22, 2006
87
0
17
NE IL
Jan 10, 2010
#1,753
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #1,753
man, I love those new 2010s all around, even the rear end =]
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
ATL
Jan 10, 2010
#1,754
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #1,754










 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Jan 10, 2010
#1,755
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #1,755
07CaliGTStang said:
Keep whoring it up guys!!
Click to expand...



I just might have to take some of mine tomorrow sporting her filthy winter look!
 
L

liberty911

New Member
Dec 7, 2009
3
0
0
SE Florida
Jan 10, 2010
#1,756
  • Jan 10, 2010
  • #1,756
Here's my '06, not best quality pics, but . . .
 

Attachments

  • CIMG0246-1.webp
    107.3 KB · Views: 232
  • CIMG0234.webp
    115 KB · Views: 234

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Jan 13, 2010
#1,757
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #1,757
Here is the way mine sits now. It will hopefully be nice Thursday to clean her up real good!






 
0

07CaliGTStang

New Member
Dec 6, 2009
20
1
0
Maryland
Jan 13, 2010
#1,758
  • Jan 13, 2010
  • #1,758
John, you sure do like your girls dirty! Wash that thing up!
 

Angel_Of_Deth

New Member
Nov 25, 2006
8
0
0
Jan 14, 2010
#1,759
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #1,759
here's my '10 GT, all the way from Kuwait!!!







 

Angel_Of_Deth

New Member
Nov 25, 2006
8
0
0
Jan 14, 2010
#1,760
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • #1,760
GT, in grabber blue ...

 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • …
  • 142
Next
First Prev 88 of 142 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Paint and Body Frame rail dimensions
  • keel
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2026
keel
J
Help finding throttle body
  • jpmaxx
  • Apr 21, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
247
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2026
jpmaxx
J
D
sad day
  • davecobra2
  • Jul 13, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
141
What is it Worth?!?!? Jul 22, 2026
davecobra2
D
W
Need help! 1989 mustang
  • wickedzach487
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
AeroCoupe
Old guy new to Forum.
  • 08shelby GT500
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
151
The Welcome Wagon Jun 15, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?