• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Power no traction...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dirty_D
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2007
D

Dirty_D

New Member
Mar 13, 2007
90
0
0
Jun 23, 2007
#1
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #1
Alright.... I got all this extra hp now but need more traction. What does ever one recommend as far as transfering all my power to the ground. Anything and everything that will help.
 

Rougestang

Member
Jun 12, 2007
59
0
6
florida
Jun 23, 2007
#2
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #2
Some upper and lower control arms to start. What kind of rims you have on your car? Try with the widest possible on the rim, or you can get some deep dish and/or get drag radials if your going to the track. some lowering springs would be good to get, and since you have your car apart at that point, do your suspension all at once.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Jun 23, 2007
#3
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #3
I'd do just lower control arms on the street - for straight line Strip traction, you cant beat UPR Products...for Strip and Auto-X type stuff, cant beat Maximum Motorsport, but it's quite a bit more pricey than UPR.
Some DRs certainly could help - for all out go with MT's ET Street on a set of Welds.
Lowering springs will do nothing for traction, actually could hurt. As far as springs are concerned, you'd want a drag setup (springs, shocks, struts) that allow weight transfer to the rear...typically these setups also come with an airbag for the RR spring to offset the inherent twisting motion.
You'll really have to learn to drive a bit differently as well...feathering the throttle to stay right on the edge of traction.
Hope that helps...
 

Bluffing024

Active Member
Mar 15, 2006
0
2
48
Somewhere
Jun 23, 2007
#4
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #4
Rougestang said:
some lowering springs would be good to get
Click to expand...

Lowering springs kill your weight transfer!
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Jun 23, 2007
#5
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #5
First Question HOW MUCH $$$$ DO YOU HAVE..??
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 23, 2007
#6
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #6
Most importantly....don't skimp on the tires. El Cheapo's are easy on the wallet, but more often than not you pay for it in performance.
 
D

Dirty_D

New Member
Mar 13, 2007
90
0
0
Jun 23, 2007
#7
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #7
lower control arms i will do. I have the stock 17" rims and its an 01 gt vert. Its kind of my weekend sleeper. I just want to put that power to the floor. When all said an done i plan on 400rwhp. After port, smaller pulley and meth kit . prob at about 320whpish. Rebuild or new motor planned for this winter when i am done driven it. Right now i just want to beable to move. So are the springs, shocks, struts ago or are they a waste? I saved for ever for this project and I have been doing most of it my self. Just want to do what will make my car perform and not buy junk.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Jun 23, 2007
#8
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #8
I have a stock suspension and 315/35/17 MT Drag radials on 10.5" deep dish wheels. Been to the track once with them and cut a 1.7 60' on the first run
 

Halfrican

New Member
Jun 19, 2007
11
0
0
Springfield, MO
Jun 23, 2007
#9
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #9
Didn't want to start a newbie thread for this, but why do people go with 35 sidewall on the rear tires on 17inch rims? Wouldn't you want 315/45/17 to keep your speedometer accurate? I see 255/45/17 on the front and 315/35/17 on the rear in peoples modlist all the time, this just seems odd to me, smaller diameter wheels on the back...
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Jun 23, 2007
#10
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #10
Halfrican said:
Didn't want to start a newbie thread for this, but why do people go with 35 sidewall on the rear tires on 17inch rims? Wouldn't you want 315/45/17 to keep your speedometer accurate? I see 255/45/17 on the front and 315/35/17 on the rear in peoples modlist all the time, this just seems odd to me, smaller diameter wheels on the back...
Click to expand...


The middle number is a percentage of the width. So the side wall is 35% of the width of the tire on a 315/35/17. A 245/45/17 is the same height as 315/15/17.
 

Halfrican

New Member
Jun 19, 2007
11
0
0
Springfield, MO
Jun 23, 2007
#11
  • Jun 23, 2007
  • #11
Wow did not know that. I always thought the middle number was the sidewall measurement
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 24, 2007
#12
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #12
jivepepper said:
The middle number is a percentage of the width. So the side wall is 35% of the width of the tire on a 315/35/17. A 245/45/17 is the same height as 315/15/17.
Click to expand...

All correct but that last /15/ should be a /35/.
 

Bluffing024

Active Member
Mar 15, 2006
0
2
48
Somewhere
Jun 24, 2007
#13
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #13
Halfrican said:
Wow did not know that. I always thought the middle number was the sidewall measurement
Click to expand...

It is the sidewall measurement. But it is the percentage of the first number. The stock tire (245/45/17) side wall is 245x.45=110.25 Aftermarket 315x35=110.25

A 315/45/17 would throw the speedo off 9.7%!!!!!!!
 

Halfrican

New Member
Jun 19, 2007
11
0
0
Springfield, MO
Jun 24, 2007
#14
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #14
gotcha, thanks man!

Also I wish someone made a 295 width tire, or an 11" rim! I like my tires to be squared up with the rim, not have tire bulging out.
 

Bluffing024

Active Member
Mar 15, 2006
0
2
48
Somewhere
Jun 24, 2007
#15
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #15
They do, I have 295/35/18's and they are the highest recommended tire on StangNet. BF Goodrich KDW2s!
 

Halfrican

New Member
Jun 19, 2007
11
0
0
Springfield, MO
Jun 24, 2007
#16
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #16
Well I use 17's, how much would a 295/35/18 throw off my speedomoter compared to a 315/35/17?
 

Bluffing024

Active Member
Mar 15, 2006
0
2
48
Somewhere
Jun 24, 2007
#17
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #17
I have 265/35/18 in front and 295/35/18 in back and my speedo is .2% off. So at 50 MPH my speedo is off 1/10th of a MPH.
 

Halfrican

New Member
Jun 19, 2007
11
0
0
Springfield, MO
Jun 24, 2007
#18
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #18
Sweet, so the 103.25mm sidewall vs. stock 110.25mm isn't that big of a difference at all then?

If so I'm going with 255/40/18 up front and 295/35/18. After much number crunching this should give me a perfect tire size for 18x9 up front and 18x10.5 in the rear. About a half inch overhang on each side of each tire.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 24, 2007
#19
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #19
Halfrican said:
Sweet, so the 103.25mm sidewall vs. stock 110.25mm isn't that big of a difference at all then?

If so I'm going with 255/40/18 up front and 295/35/18. After much number crunching this should give me a perfect tire size for 18x9 up front and 18x10.5 in the rear. About a half inch overhang on each side of each tire.
Click to expand...

Yes the 103.25 sidewall vs. stock 110.25 is a big of a difference. But you making up the difference by 1 inch in wheel diameter. The difference between 110.25 and 103.25 is 93.65%. If you take 103.25+103.25+(18*25.4) = 663.7 and 110.25+110.25+(17*25.4) = 652.3 and the difference between 663.7 and 652.3 is 98.28%.
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Jun 24, 2007
#20
  • Jun 24, 2007
  • #20
Anything you can do to make a better weight ratio from front to rear is good. For example, a battery relocation kit, tubular K member. You want the front end to be light, the rear to be heavy.

The springs in the front should be drag type that will allow the car to lift in the front and move the weight to the rear upon launch.

Tires. I have to get some also. Even though I only have about 250/295 hp&tk, my car will often spin the tires on a gentle take off. I am currently running Continental all season radials. I need a "sticky" tire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
314
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Resolved Holley terminator integration into CCRM
  • BrandonMP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
274
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2026
BrandonMP
J
Power Wire Upgrade Question
  • jhaling
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
264
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Noobz347
Thinking of selling my stang.
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
160
What is it Worth?!?!? Mar 26, 2026
Noobz347
S
01 GT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK CYLINDER LINKAGE
  • Scwhitten
  • May 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
174
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2026
melo.timo
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?