I did a search, couldn't find anything, possibly didn't look hard enough. . I just wanted to know your opinions and facts on which supercharger is better. I think the procharger looks better IMO. More bang for the buck. Happy voting
that didnt make sense, and i assume u meant the vortech comes with an intercooler, (because im pretty sure it does)GREENBIOCH said:I would go with procharger, I think it is better because of the intercooler that comes with it and the fact the oil pan doesn't need to be tapped. But the procharger you could pick up for cheaper and get an intercooler probably from someone who has had one fabbed already for fairly cheap.
I don't know if he was serious, but that statement makes a point.GREENBIOCH said:But I say just buy a V8 cause your engine is gonna die anyways....HAHAHA!!
94 3.8l stang said:well. were 3vs3 right now. Yes the procharger comes with the intercooler. I know this, any other comments about them, like which runs hotter, which is more efficient, saying they both have the same size intercooler.
cobra232 said:procharger over vortech period
the vortech needs the oil pan drilled and tapped which sounds like no problem but unless you take the pan off the car to do it you will get aluminum shavings into the pan and picked up possibly into the main or rod bearings. not a good thing.
as far as the AC is concerned no biggie but why screw with it when the procharger doesn't require moving it. and who gives a rats a$$ where it is located as long as it makes power
lastly the procharger is self contained with it's own oil which runs cooler than an engine that has been sitting in traffic getting the oil hot only to feed the non intercooled supercharger. this equals bad performance when everything is hot.
at least the procharger can cool the aircharge down and uses oil that is not heated by the engine.
here is a pic of my first dyno with my procharger on my 98 with no tune, stock injectors and FMU. notice that the 2 runs were real close to each other in power. that means little heat affected the 2nd run because of the intercooler and self contained oil. yes it is not too impressive but remember this is with 14lb injectors,stock MAF,and FMU and no tune on a singleport and making almost as much power as altblue2000 with his 42lb injectors,300l/hr pump, 80mm MAF and dynotune
i had 4 less hp and 17ftlbs more torque at 11 psi compared to his 7psi on his splitport
click below
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/8456/pics.2.jpg
after some tuning with an AF reading and fumbling with the FMU i got 260rwhp and 288ftlbs torque with the stock injectors
dude i meant no offense and wasn't directing any smears or flames at you. i know you have more left in the combo. some good tuning and maybe add an aftermarket intercooler or vortech after cooler and you should hit about 260+rwhp at 7 psiatlblue2000 said:It seems like you and I have done this before.If you look at my post, I said that for 100+rwhp it doesn't really matter where the blower sits so chill out with the attitude ("who gives a rats ass where it sits"). And as far as you making more power than me, the 230 I make now is only at 5K on 7 psi so with 4 more pounds that are intercooled you should have been right around where I am now. That 4 pounds makes up the diff between the split port and single port. I also said there were still some bugs to work out so dont go on the assumption that my combo is already maxxed out.
cobra232 said:dude i meant no offense and wasn't directing any smears or flames at you. i know you have more left in the combo. some good tuning and maybe add an aftermarket intercooler or vortech after cooler and you should hit about 260+rwhp at 7 psi
i was just trying to make a statement and unfortunatly i worded it in a way to down grade you and your combo. that was not my intent and i am sorry
Ghostalker said:that didnt make sense, and i assume u meant the vortech comes with an intercooler, (because im pretty sure it does)
you shouldn't have any spark blowout with the coppers at .035"atlblue2000 said:Ahh, its cool. I think that was more of my aggravation with my combo talking than anything else. I do in fact need something to cool the intake charge; I'm thinking the air to air is a better choice, but I need to figure out where to get the pipes from first.
While we are on the subject, it was mentioned that my graph up top looks like spark blowout. What do you think? The dyno operator said when he gets to that part of the tach, it seems to hit a wall sort of. My ign is stock, save for autolite coppers @ .035. Do you think its worth a shot to regap them to .030-.032? I know I am probably reaching here, but plug regaps are free.
cobra232 said:you shouldn't have any spark blowout with the coppers at .035"
i ran autolite 605's gapped at .035" with no problems. i think the problem may be mild detonation, which can be mistaken for spark blowout.
you can always get the IC and pipes from procharger and just get a 180 U-bend made coming out of the blower to bend around and to point to the rad then a rubber 90 elbow then run a straight pipe right behind the rad to the bottom of the rad then another 90 elbow pointing to the drivers side fender and from there the rest of the procharger IC and piping will work
good luck i hope you get the bugs worked out.
as for me all my new forged goodies for my rebuild finally came in. can't wait to build it up
mild detonation most always can't be heard but it is there.atlblue2000 said:Unless we all fell asleep (which with the time it takes this thing to cool down after each pull is a distinct possibility), none of the three of us heard a bit of detonation either during a pull or when we put it through the load test.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?