It's cool dude you just never know what under the hood of imports these days. Some of those mofos have bored out V-Tecs with turbos and even n2o on them capable of 12's. They look totally stock and move like lightning when at speed already. My wife is currently driving an Accord that is a total sleeper that runs 13's with a baby seat in the back.
Just take it out on the next one you see on the street and you will feel better
Hey what accord does she have? My GF has the new 240 hp V6. Pretty peppy. It actually took my car when I was stock on bald tires in need of a tune up. But now I eat her alive. I was thinking it would be a lot of fun with a 100 shot!! She wont go for it though.
I guess the new SRT Neon is going to be pretty fast.. i would worry more about them then most Rice , also there is a crysler 300M out that has a Hemi engine, 340 HP I think, 0-60 is low 5's
Also the new GTO is quick..
New Neon SRT-4
Acceleration figures (bone stock): 2003 modelsCar and Driver: 0-60 in 5.6 seconds, top speed 153 mph
Sport Compact Car: 5.8 seconds, quarter mile 14.2 seconds
Brooke McClelland wrote: According to their chassis dyno, this Neon puts out 223 HP and 250 lb-ft of torque at the wheels! ... In comparison, their test of a 2002 Nissan Sentra SE-R, which is rated at 175 HP, put out just 141 HP at the wheels.
I have RT130A9, which I think is 1.30A9 like you're talking about. But when I do the setup on that program it loads: Cal Edit 1.30A9 and Cal Con 1.0A7. Not Cal Con 1.30A9 like your talking about.