• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Pulled the codes...

  • Thread starter Thread starter CManT1914
  • Start date Start date Jul 19, 2005

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#1
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #1
In an ongoing attempt to track down why the stang is running crappy, I pulled the codes a few minutes ago.

On KOEO I got:

564: Electro Drive Fan circuit fault (probably from my malfunctioning high speed fan switch)

On KOER I got:

311: Thermactor air system/fault during engine run self-test

314: Thermactor air system/fault during engine run self-test / left side

332: Insufficient EGR flow detected

Well I deleted my smog pump and EGR, but I didn't think they would set any codes? I capped all the vacuum lines going to the smog pump, and I pushed the plunger halfway down and secured it on the EGR. Maybe the EGR is making it run like crap? Any ideas?
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Jul 19, 2005
#2
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #2
How recent are the O2's?

You were running pretty rich before right? I wonder if you toasted them. That could easily give the above KOER codes (besides the fact that you deleted the systems they refer to).
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#3
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #3
94-302-vert said:
How recent are the O2's?

You were running pretty rich before right? I wonder if you toasted them. That could easily give the above KOER codes (besides the fact that you deleted the systems they refer to).
Click to expand...

Stock O2's. I pulled my plugs after running the car for a bit and they were fouled out with fuel deposits. Would they make the car run like crap?
 
B

blackEagle

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
116
0
16
Calumet City,IL
Jul 19, 2005
#4
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #4
CManT1914 said:
Stock O2's. I pulled my plugs after running the car for a bit and they were fouled out with fuel deposits. Would they make the car run like crap?
Click to expand...

Change the O2s. The EEC depends on them for idle/part throttle driving to set the injector pulse witdth (how long to keep them open). Bad O2s cause a number of other problems.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#5
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #5
The only problem is the O2's are damn expensive to just replace without knowing for sure the original's are bad. Tomorrow my new balancer is coming in, I'm gonna put that on, and I'm gonna put the stock injectors back in, because I am running pig rich. I wonder if the injectors I bought are bad.
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Jul 19, 2005
#6
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #6
CManT1914 said:
The only problem is the O2's are damn expensive to just replace without knowing for sure the original's are bad. Tomorrow my new balancer is coming in, I'm gonna put that on, and I'm gonna put the stock injectors back in, because I am running pig rich. I wonder if the injectors I bought are bad.
Click to expand...
i would not put the stock fuel injectors in....just turn down your fuel pressure so your not running as rich....with the stock injectors, once u get to a certain rpm, they will start to lean out a lot which could be a no no.
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Jul 19, 2005
#7
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #7
CManT1914 said:
The only problem is the O2's are damn expensive to just replace without knowing for sure the original's are bad. Tomorrow my new balancer is coming in, I'm gonna put that on, and I'm gonna put the stock injectors back in, because I am running pig rich. I wonder if the injectors I bought are bad.
Click to expand...

Change them. Mine were the originals when I changed mine and I saw a huge difference in the quality of the car afterwards. It was stock then too.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Jul 19, 2005
#8
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #8
Yeah they don't give away the O2's, but think about it this way. you are going to need them probably sooner rather than later anyway.

Might as well give it a try.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#9
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #9
stprorolla49 said:
i would not put the stock fuel injectors in....just turn down your fuel pressure so your not running as rich....with the stock injectors, once u get to a certain rpm, they will start to lean out a lot which could be a no no.
Click to expand...

Easier said than done. I had my afpr on, and it was running so rich it wouldn't even idle long enough for me to adjust the fuel pressure. It was running at 40psi at idle, and 50 under load. So I will put my stock injectors back in, then maybe the afpr, then check to see if the 30's are good or not. I'm gonna be pissed if one is bad. I paid $150 for the things.
 
B

blackEagle

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
116
0
16
Calumet City,IL
Jul 19, 2005
#10
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #10
CManT1914 said:
Easier said than done. I had my afpr on, and it was running so rich it wouldn't even idle long enough for me to adjust the fuel pressure. It was running at 40psi at idle, and 50 under load. So I will put my stock injectors back in, then maybe the afpr, then check to see if the 30's are good or not. I'm gonna be pissed if one is bad. I paid $150 for the things.
Click to expand...

Is the C&L MAF using the correct sampling tube for the 30lb injectors? If you're running rich then this may be why. Normal fuel pressure is 38psi or so at idle.

The bad O2s may be telling the EEC that the car is lean so the EEC is trying to add more fuel.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#11
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #11
blackEagle said:
Is the C&L MAF using the correct sampling tube for the 30lb injectors? If you're running rich then this may be why. Normal fuel pressure is 38psi or so at idle.

The bad O2s may be telling the EEC that the car is lean so the EEC is trying to add more fuel.
Click to expand...

No normal fuel pressure is around 30psi at idle, and 38-40 under load, or with the vacuum line disconnected. 40 is what I was at at idle before I put the stock FPR back on. The C&L has the correct sampling tube, although it uses stock electronics, and my stock MAF went out on me last fall, which is why I got a pro-m. So that damn filament could be faulty and causing problems. I'm gonna throw the stock injectors and the pro-m (calibrated for 19's) back on tomorrow, and see what happens.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#12
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #12
CManT1914 said:
No normal fuel pressure is around 30psi at idle, and 38-40 under load, or with the vacuum line disconnected. 40 is what I was at at idle before I put the stock FPR back on. The C&L has the correct sampling tube, although it uses stock electronics, and my stock MAF went out on me last fall, which is why I got a pro-m. So that damn filament could be faulty and causing problems. I'm gonna throw the stock injectors and the pro-m (calibrated for 19's) back on tomorrow, and see what happens.
Click to expand...

Just putt around and don't push it too hard with the small inj's.

Later
Grady
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Jul 19, 2005
#13
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #13
CManT1914 said:
The only problem is the O2's are damn expensive to just replace without knowing for sure the original's are bad. Tomorrow my new balancer is coming in, I'm gonna put that on, and I'm gonna put the stock injectors back in, because I am running pig rich. I wonder if the injectors I bought are bad.
Click to expand...

Chris, they are not cheap, but your 10 year old stock O2s are probably slow if not bad so it's better to replace them. When I replaced mine it made a big difference.
Tim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
205
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
697
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
302
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
J
Thanks for the information on codes 31,34,44 and 94!
  • JK86LX50
  • Mar 5, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
256
The Welcome Wagon Aug 5, 2025
gkomo
C
Engine Code 94 and 13
  • CmdrDerp
  • Nov 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
314
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 4, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?