• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Purpose of Steam Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJCarbine
  • Start date Start date Apr 21, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Apr 21, 2007
#1
  • Apr 21, 2007
  • #1
In my recent travels on google it appears that 289 blocks have steam holes that allow, well.... pockets of steam to escape the block and prevent overheating. The GT40 heads I put on do not have these holes. Are these holes necessary, or simply a precautionary. I'd hate to rip the heads off and drill the holes unless it was critical.
 
6

65fast

Member
May 16, 2004
38
0
6
40
Mt. Airy
Apr 22, 2007
#2
  • Apr 22, 2007
  • #2
Had the same problem when installing 65 289 heads on a new roller block, I did not drill the holes. The general consensus I got was it did not matter if you drilled the holes.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
46
Algonquin, IL
www.cardomain.com
Apr 22, 2007
#3
  • Apr 22, 2007
  • #3
When I bought my Trickflow heads the instructions said you had to drill steam holes in your block if they didn't already have them. So, I called Trickflow to see if it was absolutely necessary to drill the holes in my block because I didn't have them already, they ended up saying I had to drill the holes.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
77
Confederate States of America
www.historicmustang.com
Apr 22, 2007
#4
  • Apr 22, 2007
  • #4
coolblue65 said:
When I bought my Trickflow heads the instructions said you had to drill steam holes in your block if they didn't already have them. So, I called Trickflow to see if it was absolutely necessary to drill the holes in my block because I didn't have them already, they ended up saying I had to drill the holes.
Click to expand...

I did the same on my 289 block when installing the newer model Edelbrock heads. Simply follow the instructions provided.

HistoricMustang
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
Apr 23, 2007
#5
  • Apr 23, 2007
  • #5
I had the opposite. I had holes in the block and not in the heads. Pooped up 2 head gaskets before I drilled the holes in the heads.

I would have never thought it would make a difference either.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jan 18, 2008
#6
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #6
I didnt drill the holes in the block

with my Edelbrock heads, and my car over heats real easy, I think I`m gonna have to tear the heads off and do it before summer.
 

VTStang66

Founding Member
Apr 2, 2001
2,407
0
0
44
Rockwall, TX
Jan 18, 2008
#7
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #7
Does anybody have pics of these steam holes? I've never heard of them. I have Edelbrock heads and ran them for a couple years with no heating problems, but the engine was mild. I have water passage holes, but I don't see any others.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jan 18, 2008
#8
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #8
To my knowledge its only needed

on blocks older then 1981. Me and my engine builder went round and round over this issue and I let him talk me out of it.......big mistake on my part.

Chances are if you needed to drill yours you`d already know. Mine heats up in like 10 seconds or less when I flog it, and every part is new, including radiator.

Here is part of an email I received from Edelbrock tech on the issue.

The cylinder head has a large, roughly kidney shaped, water passage cast into it that feeds the steam hole, it is not a separate distinct hole. Our heads are reversible, there is a hole in the appropriate area on both sides. Please note that the driver’s side and passenger’s side holes are in different positions. The steam hole would be drilled in the block, it would not have to match the shape of the hole on the cylinder head. Although I am uncertain of the precise consequences of not drilling that hole, I would have to assume that it would cause a significant cooling issue.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
67
tucson,az
Jan 18, 2008
#9
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #9
the steam holes are there to prevent hot spots, and to prevent those hot spots from becoming heating issues when the cooling system ages.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 18, 2008
#10
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #10
You absolutely have to drill them to match the block if not the steam will push the gasket up and start to empty coolant into your crankcase. Had this happen to me with a 68 289 and aftermarket heads.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jan 18, 2008
#11
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #11
Is this something I can do with it in the car?

Will the metal shavings go down into the block and hurt it?

The guy that wants the pics of where the holes go, try the Edelbrock website, I bet there is info on there, look for the old style heads 1981 or older, and there should be a spec sheet with the part. Mine were part number 60229.
 
H

Harndog

New Member
May 28, 2007
86
0
0
Jan 18, 2008
#12
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #12
As far as metal shaving's in the block. Best case would be to have the block cleaned afterwards but I have seen guys put a globe of vasoline on their drill bit and it will catch most if not all of the shavings. Good luck
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Jan 19, 2008
#13
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #13
does this apply to the 351W?
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
Jan 19, 2008
#14
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #14
PUNISHER RACING said:
You absolutely have to drill them to match the block if not the steam will push the gasket up and start to empty coolant into your crankcase. Had this happen to me with a 68 289 and aftermarket heads.
Click to expand...



This is what happened to me. Both of my head gaskets failed at the steam hole.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jan 19, 2008
#15
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #15
I think it applys to small block fords in general

that are running aftermarket heads that require the steamhole provision.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 19, 2008
#16
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #16
You don't drill the block you drill the bottom of the head to correspond with the block. I believe this is only necessary on blocks earlier than 70 or 72
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Jan 19, 2008
#17
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #17
my 351w's block didnt have steam holes. it is a mid 70s casting
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
Jan 19, 2008
#18
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #18
PUNISHER RACING said:
You don't drill the block you drill the bottom of the head to correspond with the block. I believe this is only necessary on blocks earlier than 70 or 72
Click to expand...



I feel like I'm your follow up show.....



At the time I was using a 72 302 block and a 69 351w head. The 351w head did not have the steam holes.

Finding the location to drill the head was easy. My new set of 302 head gaskets had a hole in them. Mark it with a sharpie and drill.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Jan 19, 2008
#19
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #19
Do AFR 185s on an early 351W need the holes drilled?
 
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Jan 19, 2008
#20
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #20
Anyone got a photo of a steam hole?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Seemingly random 'will it fit' and 'how well does it work' kinds of questions...
  • JasonRP
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2021
2000xp8
M
Engine 1986 GT block prob
  • Magnet86
  • Dec 22, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 10, 2019
dgollem
M
several general questions about my new 93 gt
  • moon9398
  • Oct 29, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 30, 2018
General karthief
NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?