• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Purpose of Steam Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJCarbine
  • Start date Start date Apr 21, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Edster

Founding Member
Aug 13, 2000
500
1
19
League City, Texas
Jan 20, 2008
#21
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • #21
Wow I I've got an old school build a 72 302 block w/ D0OE 351W heads that did not have the steam holes. The block had the holes though. I had no overheating problems. But when I put the same engine in the 'Stang I had a bit of trouble. The radiator was the same 3 core out of the Falcon so I was wondering if it was the smaller grill opening in the 'Stang. I was in Virginia when I had the Falcon and in Texas w/ the same engine and radiator in the 'Stang. The climate in Texas is warmer. I'm wondering if I need to drill the heads. the Ford Performance book by Pat Ganahl mention a set of head gaskets w/ a hole that is elongated to remedy this. Has anyone seen this gasket?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 20, 2008
#22
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • #22
You only need to drill the heads if the block has the holes too!
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jan 20, 2008
#23
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • #23
I dont know about these other guys

but in my case the block has to be drilled to match the water port on the head, and yes you can use the gasket as a template. And my block is a 1975 model.

This is a big geuss, but I think anyone that has a 2 peice rear main is gonna have this problem with several aftermarket heads.
 
H

Helmantel

New Member
Aug 9, 2006
206
1
0
Jan 21, 2008
#24
  • Jan 21, 2008
  • #24
I drilled holes in the 69 351W heads I have on my 65 289. I don't know if it's really necessary. Since Ford deleted them sometime during production, I guess not.
 

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Apr 27, 2008
#25
  • Apr 27, 2008
  • #25
I'm fixing to do a head swap, but what I found confusing was when I checked out my head gaskets they have the steam passage openings on the side marked "FRONT" but nothing on the back.
I'd assume this would be fine if I dont have the holes in the back of my block, but with the current situation I'll have the the drivers side back holes closed, and the pass. will be open. If so, can I just flip the head gasket over to keep the "Front" annotation correct? Or just open up the gasket to make it all fit?
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Jun 9, 2008
#26
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #26
I`m about to drill mine out

Its in the 90 degree range daily now, and I cant drive my car around much cause it overheats too much. Gonna teardown this weekend and drill some holes.

For you guys wanting more info on this, go to edelbrocks website.

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/misc/tech_center/install/6000/60299.pdf

According to this, 351W dont need the holes.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Nov 20, 2008
#27
  • Nov 20, 2008
  • #27
do you only need to drill one hole on each side of the engine or a hole for each piston? The edelbrock instructions are not very clear. it only show #1 and #5, then over on the TFS heads website it talks about drilling out all of the holes. Anyone actually done this?
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Nov 21, 2008
#28
  • Nov 21, 2008
  • #28
Its just the front 2 pistons.

Yall will love this, I pulled my heads off and the holes were already there. So my overheating issue is not solved yet.

I`ve come to some conclusions about this issue which may be wrong or right. I think if you have a 65 or 66 stang with the small radiator opening that if you bore the motor out you are going to have issues with heat especially if your motor is pushing more hp then it was designed to. With the larger radiators in the later cars I dont think those guys have the issues the early cars do.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Seemingly random 'will it fit' and 'how well does it work' kinds of questions...
  • JasonRP
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2021
2000xp8
M
Engine 1986 GT block prob
  • Magnet86
  • Dec 22, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 10, 2019
dgollem
M
several general questions about my new 93 gt
  • moon9398
  • Oct 29, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 30, 2018
General karthief
NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?