• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

pushing stock block to limits, what combo is least stress on internals

  • Thread starter Thread starter spederman
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Dec 26, 2008
#1
  • Dec 26, 2008
  • #1
I've got 405/400 hp/tq. Had this power level for a couple years and getting bored. I know this is about the breaking point of the stock block but some live up to 450hp i assume depending on the tune. I figure if it blows, oh well, i'll save up by next summer to get a built motor. For the mean time, what combo would be least stressful on the engine/internals (looking for 450hp or so)

combo #1:
-3.0 pulley for vortech s trim sq pushing prolly around 11psi
-snow perf meth kit

combo #2:
-blower cams
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Dec 27, 2008
#2
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #2
I would NOT do the cams. The car will not pick up that much and will just put more stress on everything.

Go with the smaller pulley WITH methanol injection. Methanol injection cools the air coming into the engine after it is supercharged. Depending on boost...the average Mustang will see temps anywhere from 45-100 degrees cooler. It also acts as an octane booster. Premium fuel is all that is needed. You do NOT need race gas with meth. The meth will keep the car running cooler and safer with the added power.

Power does not kill Mustang engines. Not enough octane and improper/overagressive tuning kills Mustang engines.
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
Dec 27, 2008
#3
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #3
SVT32VDOHC said:
Power does not kill Mustang engines. Not enough octane and improper/overagressive tuning kills Mustang engines.
Click to expand...

Exactally

+1 Hotmustang331 had 550+rwhp on his Turbo GT Stang with a Stock Block and it held up well.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Dec 27, 2008
#4
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #4
the right cams should bump it to over 450.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Dec 27, 2008
#5
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #5
Meth and pulley has got my vote. The meth will lower intake temps and allow a smaller pulley
 

y2k02

Member
Apr 19, 2004
83
0
17
Dec 27, 2008
#6
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #6
Horsepower will kill the stock rods.
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Dec 27, 2008
#7
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #7
I know i'm really taking a gamble by doing this, but i just want to see what this stock engine will take. Kinda how Hotmustang felt and took his to crazy numbers. I wanna see what i can do.

Thats why i kinda want everybodies input to see which way would be the lesser evil of the two. So far it seems smaller pulley/meth inj is getting the vote.
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Dec 27, 2008
#8
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #8
i'd go with heads/cams. i know the heads weren't on your list, but better airflow will be less stressful on the engine than increased boost pressure.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Dec 27, 2008
#9
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #9
mustangman9812 said:
Exactally

+1 Hotmustang331 had 550+rwhp on his Turbo GT Stang with a Stock Block and it held up well.
Click to expand...

Turbo and Supercharger are two completely different things. Turbo doesn't take HP to turn like a Supercharger and thus more power can be made on the stock parts with the same amount of boost.

and power most definitely will kill a Mustang engine. Will the power level he is suggesting going to break the engine? Probably not but to make a blanket statement like that is pretty careless. Go put 550RWHP through a PD or Centrifugal blower for a few months and come back and say that.

Bill
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Dec 27, 2008
#10
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #10
I completely agree with Mustang92.

I wouldn't go with cams because it will increase the rev band where you operate the engine. More revs means more stress on the rods, which is the weakest point of a stock engine.
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Dec 27, 2008
#11
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #11
DBMSTNG said:
i'd go with heads/cams. i know the heads weren't on your list, but better airflow will be less stressful on the engine than increased boost pressure.
Click to expand...

id luv to do heads but arent they $1700ish alone? i kinda wanna stay around $1k total
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Dec 27, 2008
#12
  • Dec 27, 2008
  • #12
my buddy has been pushing 443/467 for 55K with his KB car and it is still going strong.

even ran it on the race side of the chip (unknown numbers) numerous times with no problems. he doesnt drive the car easy at all either. i cant believe it is still running

all this on the KB tune
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Dec 29, 2008
#13
  • Dec 29, 2008
  • #13
Got the smaller pulley and meth kit on the way. Just gotta pick out the a/f gauge and then a new a-pillar pod. This is going to be a nerve racking experiment. But i cant wait to see what she'll hold for power. Going on over 400hp for 2 yrs so hopefully i have one of those strong engines that can another 50hp or so. But i'm prepared for the risk of my car being down prolly till end of summer while i get the cash to rebuild.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Dec 30, 2008
#14
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #14
spederman said:
But i'm prepared for the risk of my car being down prolly till end of summer while i get the cash to rebuild.
Click to expand...

Then you are good to go. As long as you know the risks and are prepared for them. I'm in the same boat with my car. I make a hair over the "limit" for my stock engine and I'm prepared for it if something happens.

Bill
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Dec 30, 2008
#15
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #15
Man, now im confused. I was emailing Tim @ modularpowerhouse and he recommends cams. He says that its least stressful on the engine.

And if anybody on this planet knows things about stangs, its him for sure.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Dec 30, 2008
#16
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #16
Cams are less stressful because you are not adding any boost. Your car would definatly benefit from blower cams and a tune. Depending on the cams, you may nor may not need springs and that would just add on to the cost.

The only thing that is going to add more stress is more boost, a bad tune, or more boost and a bad tune.

Cams and meth are the safest route.

Heads and cam would be even better because you make make more power on less boost... but the price is insane for the gains you are looking for.

The block itself isn't the part thats going to give up the ghost, it's the pistons and rods...
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Dec 30, 2008
#17
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #17
Just sleep on it man. 405RWHP and 400RWTQ is a strong street car. I make 408RWHP and 366RWTQ with my 96 Cobra and there isn't much I run into that can beat me. I mean....I don't go down to the organized street racing areas around here and race the 9-10 second cars, but when I run into your average car like my 96 is, I can take them. Vette, GTO, Camaro, Mustang whatever. You are prolly good where you are at, so just take the time and see what happens.
 
B

blksq10psi

Member
Aug 1, 2008
114
0
16
PHILLY
Dec 30, 2008
#18
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #18
im with svt32vdohc whit your hp #'s im pulling 380 and there isnt nothing that will give you a hard time on the street mine is a d/d and most of the time everyone backs off when the hear the whistle... many people say 450 -480 to the tires is the cutoff the rods are the weak link in the 2v motors
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Dec 30, 2008
#19
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #19
blksq10psi said:
im pulling 380 and there isnt nothing that will give you a hard time on the street
Click to expand...


i'm putting down over 600 and i'm one of the slowest cars in my area!!
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Dec 30, 2008
#20
  • Dec 30, 2008
  • #20
I hear ya guys. You would think that 400hp would be enuf. But its like a sickness. I cant stop, i told myself that 400 hp mark would be the stopping point. But lately moved it up to 450hp and i'll be happy.

plus i bought my snow perf kit yesterday. called my shop today inquiring about cams/springs/tune & can get it all done for about $1500.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Timing Cover/harmonic Balancer Removal And Replacement
  • jrichker
  • May 28, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
Noobz347
C
  • Locked
1995 Cobra... 331, Vortech, TKO, Griggs and more!
  • CarCrazyRDM
  • Jan 2, 2012
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
5
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Feb 8, 2012
Gtwo
F
  • Locked
Vortech Blown 93 LX Hatch in NJ
  • FoxEffect89LX
  • Nov 1, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
5K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jan 2, 2011
FoxEffect89LX
F
Finally running....Dyno numbers inside
  • Wi Stang
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 9, 2008
Wi Stang
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?