• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Question For Why Aod To T5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wildstanger86
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,243
17,924
224
Massachusetts
Sep 4, 2017
#21
  • Sep 4, 2017
  • #21
The 3.8l shares the same bolt pattern as the 5.0, so you at looking for a 3.8l trans. I think after 2003 they went elevtronis speedo.

Your have to give the donor trans a performance rebuild. Stall converter, extra clutches, shift kit, cooler. Will take big power.

Another option is to have someone rebuild and AOD with the 4r70w guts.

If you are serious about building up an automatic, this is the better option. I've seen built 4r70ws stuck behind 600-700hp drag terminator Cobras and hold up to launching on slicks.
 

imp

Mustang Master
Jul 13, 2017
531
105
83
Sep 4, 2017
#22
  • Sep 4, 2017
  • #22
FastDriver said:
Because real men use 3 pedals
Click to expand...
Yeah, but so did the Model T! imp
 

fredfifty

5 Year Member
Nov 23, 2011
318
57
59
SF Bay Area
Sep 13, 2017
#23
  • Sep 13, 2017
  • #23
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-carjacker-cant-drive-stick-shift-20150216-story.html
 
Reactions: Jersey Joe

Gear grabber

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2016
283
152
63
Sep 13, 2017
#24
  • Sep 13, 2017
  • #24
Wildstanger86 said:
I am eventually looking at maybe putting a 351 in it and just want a trans that will be good and last me. I plan on ever now and then getting on her pretty good. Just looking to take her out and have some fun.
Click to expand...

T-56, row the gear box and 2 overdrives. The up front cost will hurt,but it is fun.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Sep 13, 2017
#25
  • Sep 13, 2017
  • #25
I love the manual transmission experience.
Had to search high and low for my 6spd Wrangler.
Having said that, if I had an AOD Fox and the AOD was giving up the ghost, I'd simply build the AOD.
A well built auto is still a lot of fun... yes they rob more power in dyno-land, but built correctly they actually put more power to the ground... especially once you get older and your legs and arms slow down... this is experience talking.
 
Reactions: imp

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Sep 13, 2017
#26
  • Sep 13, 2017
  • #26
The v6 3.8 bell housing will bolt up to a 5.0 but the starter won't work...making it pointless. The 5.0 has a 157 tooth flywheel...the 3.8 has a 164 tooth flywheel. The starter locations on the bell housings don't match up.

You can swap it if you use a 5.0 truck flywheel, clutch, and starter. The clutch and flywheel are bigger than a fox 5.0...there are small advantages to that. The clutch will hold more but the weight will cause the engine to take a little longer to settle after revving...and it'll take longer to climb rpms. Probably would never really notice.

The bell housing will also set the trans further back in the tunnel. The thing to do would be to buy a 94-95 v8 bell housing.

I've heard of people swapping the input shaft and bearing retainer for a fox one. You could then use a fox 5.0 bell housing.
 
Last edited: Sep 13, 2017

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,079
2,680
224
Vass, NC
Sep 14, 2017
#27
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #27
90sickfox said:
The clutch will hold more but the weight will cause the engine to take a little longer to settle after revving...and it'll take longer to climb rpms. Probably would never really notice.
Click to expand...

Out of curiosity, are you talking about an 11" clutch? I've seen them out there, but didn't know what they went on.

The added surface area is a positive as it increases the grabbing power, but the increased radius adds "moment of inertia" and more mass. That's double-trouble on any weak drivetrain components, because it increases the shock on the launch. My go-to drivetrain guys advised staying away from that idea. On street tires or with cars that won't launch at high RPM, then I'm sure it doesn't really make a difference. But, then, what is the point to the swap?
 
Reactions: imp

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,243
17,924
224
Massachusetts
Sep 14, 2017
#28
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #28
cleanLX said:
Having said that, if I had an AOD Fox and the AOD was giving up the ghost, I'd simply build the AOD.
A well built auto is still a lot of fun... yes they rob more power in dyno-land, but built correctly they actually put more power to the ground... especially once you get older and your legs and arms slow down... this is experience talking.
Click to expand...

I still have my AOD that came out of the car. Didn't feel like selling it and having to bring people into my house to show it. But recently I came across a nice 1990 GT vert that had a blown AOD for $1500. Nothing else was wrong with it and it was a DD type of car. I tried to get there as quick as I could, but someone else beat me to it. I would have tossed my old AOD in the car and cruised it around and just cleaned it up.

But my point was I don't have an pure hatred for AOD cars. I just think stick cars are more fun, but there are situations where I would prefer an automatic...like sitting in traffic on my way to work sipping a coffee.
 
Reactions: imp and 90sickfox

Black1987

my wife Bedazzled my input shaft
15 Year Member
Jan 9, 2011
1,064
595
174
NC
Sep 14, 2017
#29
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #29
90sickfox said:
The v6 3.8 bell housing will bolt up to a 5.0 but the starter won't work...making it pointless. The 5.0 has a 157 tooth flywheel...the 3.8 has a 164 tooth flywheel. The starter locations on the bell housings don't match up.

You can swap it if you use a 5.0 truck flywheel, clutch, and starter. The clutch and flywheel are bigger than a fox 5.0...there are small advantages to that. The clutch will hold more but the weight will cause the engine to take a little longer to settle after revving...and it'll take longer to climb rpms. Probably would never really notice.

The bell housing will also set the trans further back in the tunnel. The thing to do would be to buy a 94-95 v8 bell housing.

I've heard of people swapping the input shaft and bearing retainer for a fox one. You could then use a fox 5.0 bell housing.
Click to expand...

I think this was in regards to Mustang5L5 response (least how I read it). He was referring to the 3.8's 4R70W bolting up to the 5.0 not the 3.8's manual. Everything you said about the 3.8 to 5.0 manual swap is on point tho.

@Mustang5L5 what is needed in the 4R70W swap besides a Controller (and/or manual valve body) and custom driveshaft? Do you need the controller if you swap guts from the 4R70W to AOD?
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,243
17,924
224
Massachusetts
Sep 14, 2017
#30
  • Sep 14, 2017
  • #30
Black1987 said:
I
@Mustang5L5 what is needed in the 4R70W swap besides a Controller (and/or manual valve body) and custom driveshaft? Do you need the controller if you swap guts from the 4R70W to AOD?
Click to expand...

I really don't know. My general knowledge of the swap is more of just an overview. I do believe this is a common swap though and the info should be readily available to find. I just don't know it well enough to dive into the deeper details like that as to what needs to be done
 
Reactions: imp
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
294
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
C
Electrical Under dash wiring
  • ChicagoMustang
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
109
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
T
Newbie looking for some info on speedo gears
  • TDM389
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
240
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
TDM389
T
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
AOD TV linkage
  • Titanium90
  • Jun 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
273
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 10, 2025
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?