• Mustang Forums
  • Special Production

Roush Ran a Stealth RT TT Questions???

  • Thread starter Thread starter sy1172
  • Start date Start date Mar 10, 2006
S

sy1172

New Member
May 11, 2005
175
0
0
Mar 10, 2006
#1
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #1
I ran a Dodge Stealth RT Twin Turbo tonight from 50 to approx. 130 and I must say I am very surprised how well he hung on. Granted, I don't know what kind of mods he had but it looked stock (couldn't hear it over the Bassani ). These things that fast? I was slightly (just slightly) pulling on him third through forth but as soon as I hit fifth he was catching up (120-130ish). With my set up I assume I am around 400hp +- a few so he did well assuming stock at 300hp for him.

Thoughts?
 

Saleen Mike

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
824
0
0
Mar 10, 2006
#2
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #2
Be happy you didn't run from a stop with him stepping off the clutch at 6000 rpms
 

saleenster

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
2,621
0
47
Vancouver, WA
Mar 11, 2006
#3
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #3
Saleen Mike said:
Be happy you didn't run from a stop with him stepping off the clutch at 6000 rpms
Click to expand...


AWD would be a killer for sure. With tune ability in the form of handheld equipment, boosted cars can make quite a jump from adding timing, fuel, etc with such gadgets. If he stayed with you, he has mods for sure. Those things weigh almost 4000 lbs too without driver
 

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
Mar 11, 2006
#4
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #4
You're closer to +/- 350rwhp. So with the stang added weight ... he may have a chance...
 
S

sy1172

New Member
May 11, 2005
175
0
0
Mar 11, 2006
#5
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #5
I was talking horsepower at the crank, not the wheels. What does 350rwhp equate to at the crank (what's the loss)?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Mar 11, 2006
#6
  • Mar 11, 2006
  • #6
Sy, flywheel hp is irrelevant.

15% loss is how it usually works, but when someone describes a flywheel number it's likely a guesstimate, when they use Rear wheel, it's likely been on a dyno for real proof.

If he hung with you that well, his car was worked, they are slow from a roll, and even in the quarter they are mid 14 cars stock. Nothing impressive.

Your 350rwhp would easily eliminate a stock steath.
That's like 100 more RWHP minimum you got on a stock one. Awd is great for launches, but soaks up alot of power when already moving.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
The LS Fox Concept Car
  • yldouright
  • Jul 19, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 26, 2018
General karthief
A
Buyer Beware: Wilwood Aero4 Rear Big Brake Kit Parking Failure
  • absoffthewake
  • Aug 9, 2015
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
5K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2015
absoffthewake
A
S
Random Timing Chain Failure = Disaster!
  • silverbullet221
  • Jul 26, 2014
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
4K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 29, 2014
1987stangman
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • Special Production
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?