• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Ran my '05 at track today

  • Thread starter Thread starter uthatch
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2004
U

uthatch

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
221
0
0
Studio City, CA
Dec 12, 2004
#1
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #1
I ran my '05, manual GT at LACR in Palmdale, CA today. If anyone is familiar with the track you know it's at about 3000 ft. altitude and the weather was not really good today...kind of hot and humid. My car has about 4000 miles on it and is bone stock. I haven't even changed the oil yet.

Anyway it sounds like I'm making excuses already, and at first I thought I might need to since this was my first time there and the car felt slow. My best run ended up being a 14.03 at 98.3. That was without powershifting or really killing it out of the hole. I need to use the car and I dn't really know anyone to fix it if I break it (dealers can't fix anything right).

I'm told that time easily corrects to a 13.5 or 13.6 at 102-103 mph. I really don't know, but I do know there was an '03 Lightning there running 14.5 at 94 and a later RX-7 that ran beside me. He went 14.2 at 95. In comparison my own Lightning runs 13.6 at 100 at my local track in NJ (I'm back and forth between L.A. and NJ all the time).

So here is the actual breakdown of the ticket. I don't have a scanner so if you don't beleive me it's fine, but it's all true.

Best Run:
14:09 hours

60'-2.13 (smooth but soft launch like I said)
I2-5.88
I3-9.03 MPH-77.872
et-14.031 MPH-98.202


2nd Best Run:
14:22 hours

60'-2.12 (I tried to be slightly more aggresive but save the clutch)
I2-5.916
I3-9.078 MPH-77.523
et- 14.092 MPH-98.317

My worst run of the day was a 14.20 so the car was really consistant. I did nothing in between runs either...no intake icing, no tire pressure changes...nothing.

So overall, I'm fairly happy. Most people at the track were really impressed it was as fast it was.
 

ShelbyMan

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
128
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#2
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #2
At first glance at your time, Best Run:
14:09 hours, I thought wow, that is slow!!! lol
But anyway, It takes time getting use to your new Mustangs feel for the power. What RPM's did you shift at? Though it doesn't affect your ET, what were your reaction times?
 
U

uthatch

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
221
0
0
Studio City, CA
Dec 12, 2004
#3
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #3
ShelbyMan said:
At first glance at your time, Best Run:
14:09 hours, I thought wow, that is slow!!! lol
But anyway, It takes time getting use to your new Mustangs feel for the power. What RPM's did you shift at? Though it doesn't affect your ET, what were your reaction times?
Click to expand...


Yeah, I thought the times were pretty bad too at first because I didn't realize the correctiion factor would be THAT much.

I shifted at redline each time, used all of 3 gears. Like I said earlier, I shifted quickly, but no powershifting. I've been drag racing for years and know how easy it is to be sitting along side of the track with no ride home.

Reaction times were:
.202
.082 (along side RX7, great to burn the ricer.)
-.016 (got a little jumpy)
.195
.229 (fast asleep)
 

outdoorstom

New Member
Nov 29, 2004
42
0
0
Brasher Falls, NY (Waaay upstate!)
Dec 12, 2004
#4
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #4
This is not a criticism, just a question. 4000 miles and you haven't done your first oil change yet? Isn't the first one supposed to be at 1000 miles?
 
D

drummer

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
84
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#5
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #5
uthatch said:
I ran my '05, manual GT at LACR in Palmdale, CA today. If anyone is familiar with the track you know it's at about 3000 ft. altitude and the weather was not really good today...kind of hot and humid. My car has about 4000 miles on it and is bone stock. I haven't even changed the oil yet.

Anyway it sounds like I'm making excuses already, and at first I thought I might need to since this was my first time there and the car felt slow. My best run ended up being a 14.03 at 98.3. That was without powershifting or really killing it out of the hole. I need to use the car and I dn't really know anyone to fix it if I break it (dealers can't fix anything right).

I'm told that time easily corrects to a 13.5 or 13.6 at 102-103 mph. I really don't know, but I do know there was an '03 Lightning there running 14.5 at 94 and a later RX-7 that ran beside me. He went 14.2 at 95. In comparison my own Lightning runs 13.6 at 100 at my local track in NJ (I'm back and forth between L.A. and NJ all the time).

So here is the actual breakdown of the ticket. I don't have a scanner so if you don't beleive me it's fine, but it's all true.

Best Run:
14:09 hours

60'-2.13 (smooth but soft launch like I said)
I2-5.88
I3-9.03 MPH-77.872
et-14.031 MPH-98.202


2nd Best Run:
14:22 hours

60'-2.12 (I tried to be slightly more aggresive but save the clutch)
I2-5.916
I3-9.078 MPH-77.523
et- 14.092 MPH-98.317

My worst run of the day was a 14.20 so the car was really consistant. I did nothing in between runs either...no intake icing, no tire pressure changes...nothing.

So overall, I'm fairly happy. Most people at the track were really impressed it was as fast it was.
Click to expand...


Sounds to me like you should be happy with those results as those other 3 guys faired worse than you.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Dec 12, 2004
#6
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #6
Nice times for the altitude and weather.
 
U

uthatch

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
221
0
0
Studio City, CA
Dec 12, 2004
#7
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #7
outdoorstom said:
This is not a criticism, just a question. 4000 miles and you haven't done your first oil change yet? Isn't the first one supposed to be at 1000 miles?
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm sure I should change it soon. I figured at 5000 miles I would. I drove the car cross country last week and that's where the miles came from, so it's all highway miles if it matters. Anyway, I'll only keep it until the new Cobra is out.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 13, 2004
#8
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #8
Nice times good job driving!
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Dec 13, 2004
#9
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #9
what are the times corrected?
 

dozlert

New Member
Nov 8, 2004
29
0
0
Nebraska
Dec 13, 2004
#10
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #10
uthatch said:
If anyone is familiar with the track you know it's at about 3000 ft. altitude and the weather was not really good today...kind of hot and humid. My best run ended up being a 14.03 at 98.3. My worst run of the day was a 14.20 so the car was really consistant.
Click to expand...


That's not bad for the altitude!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2016 Mustang Gt Auto With 3:55 Rear Track Times...
  • jelsis
  • May 26, 2016
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
4
Views
2K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Jun 5, 2016
echo7
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
My First Time Down A Track
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 13, 2014
  • Video and Media
Replies
2
Views
2K
Video and Media May 5, 2018
gtsn95
Engine Observations While I Changed My Pip Today
  • sixt9coug
  • Feb 1, 2014
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 6, 2014
sixt9coug
Finally Ran My 91 At The Track Last Night With The New Setup
  • LarsD
  • Oct 4, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2012
RsStanG1987
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?