• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Realistic Hp/tq Expectations...

  • Thread starter Thread starter CT Grim
  • Start date Start date Sep 18, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,687
224
Vass, NC
Sep 22, 2013
#41
  • Sep 22, 2013
  • #41
I'd say with a good port job, you'd pick up a minimum of 10hp, but probably closer to 20, based on what I already mentioned in post #17.
 

CT Grim

Member
Aug 5, 2013
40
9
19
Tucson, AZ
Sep 22, 2013
#42
  • Sep 22, 2013
  • #42
Here is the lower...


 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 23, 2013
#43
  • Sep 23, 2013
  • #43
That intake had a little port work done

Kurts gotta be talking a 77mm...those things are huge aluminum meters but it was the go to meter years ago until the plastic 80mm came out. I'm also not a fan of the lightning meter on anything....

Cam could go a few ways personally.. comp 35-552-8 I like

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,687
224
Vass, NC
Sep 23, 2013
#44
  • Sep 23, 2013
  • #44
Ok. I stand corrected on the LMAF.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 23, 2013
#45
  • Sep 23, 2013
  • #45
FastDriver said:
Ok. I stand corrected on the LMAF.
Click to expand...



Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,687
224
Vass, NC
Sep 23, 2013
#46
  • Sep 23, 2013
  • #46
So, aside from pegging the meter, what's the deal with the LMAFs? I just read through this thread from about a year and a half ago: http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-for...better-lightning-90mm-maf-or-c-l-85mm.856979/

Back then, everyone seemed to be hunky dorry with it.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 23, 2013
#47
  • Sep 23, 2013
  • #47
This is the closest one to the one I have. Mine is flanged and has a slightly different sample setup. It was a Pro-M before they went out of business the first time. Then it was PMAS, and I think they are about of business now, and they have started up Pro-M again. I can't keep track.

http://www.atomicperformance.com/ProductImages/pmas/PMAS-75ASRCV.jpg

I have heard bad things about the Lightning MAF, but I defer to Rick on explaining it because he is more familiar with it. That intake has definitely already been ported.

Kurt
 

CT Grim

Member
Aug 5, 2013
40
9
19
Tucson, AZ
Sep 23, 2013
#48
  • Sep 23, 2013
  • #48
Awesome! ...I kinda suspected some work had been done. Now to get it all put together!
 

CT Grim

Member
Aug 5, 2013
40
9
19
Tucson, AZ
Sep 26, 2013
#49
  • Sep 26, 2013
  • #49
Snapped a rod bolt installing the new bearings...my luck lately.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,687
224
Vass, NC
Sep 26, 2013
#50
  • Sep 26, 2013
  • #50
I'm sure it'll be good with a little JB Weld
 

CT Grim

Member
Aug 5, 2013
40
9
19
Tucson, AZ
Sep 26, 2013
#51
  • Sep 26, 2013
  • #51
Store was out of JB Weld...so I went with a new set of ARP's.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,086
2,687
224
Vass, NC
Sep 27, 2013
#52
  • Sep 27, 2013
  • #52
lol
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?