• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

rear end difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter bertman
  • Start date Start date Oct 18, 2006

bertman

Member
Oct 30, 2004
55
0
7
Portsmouth Va
Oct 18, 2006
#1
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #1
Have 65 mustang that had a 289 in it. Also have a 66 that has a inline 6 in it. The outside of the rear end look the same. Are they. And if they are what is the difference between the 2:SNSign:
 
G

gjz30075

Member
Aug 30, 2004
250
0
17
Roswell, Ga
Oct 18, 2006
#2
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #2
They may very well be the same, however, from the factory, the I6 car came with a 7 3/4" rear end which is quite a bit different from a V8 car, which came with an 8". The 8" has the gears in a removable carrier unit, unbolted from the front and the 7" has a plate the bolts to the back of the housing to get to the gears.

Your 289 car could have been an I6 car with an engine transplant and nothing else changed. Or, more unlikely, your I6 car had an 8" put in it.
 
1

1966conv

New Member
Mar 5, 2004
220
0
0
Oct 18, 2006
#3
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #3
Another thing to note; the 6 cylinder cars have 4 lugs per wheel and the V8's have 5. The 6 vs 8 are radically different rearends also in that in a "true" 65 V8 the axle tube are tapered where as the 6 cylinder rears are straight tubes.

Without a little more info it's kinda hard to tell what you have. The other poster is correct in that your 289 car could have started life as an I6, and not had the rear end changed, (naughty-naughty) or the 6 cyl car could have been upgraded to a 8" rear end. The 6 & the 8 really don't look the same.
 

ultrastang

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,092
2
37
Arkansas
Oct 18, 2006
#4
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #4
If you look on the 5th letter from the left on the VIN plate, there will be a letter for the engine code. If it's not an A, C, D, or K, then the car was originally equipped with a 6-cylinder engine.

The base rear end for a V8 Mustang was the 8-inch. Only the HiPo 289s from '65-'67 came with factory 9-inch rear ends. After '66, when Ford started putting big-blocks in the Mustangs, 9-inch rears were used with those engines, but regular small blocks got the standard-issue 8-inch rears.


www.ultrastang.com
 

killer medic

Member
Mar 30, 2005
60
0
6
West Palm Beach, FL.
Oct 19, 2006
#5
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #5
I bought my 67 coupe that way as well. It was originally an I6 and was upgraded (engine-wise) to a 302. I am still trying to find out EXACTLY what kind of car the engine came out of (I believe it came from a Comet). That's another topic. Anyway, the VERY day I bought the car, I made the eager (and I think common) mistake of trying to peel-out, then get on the highway before truely inspecting the car (newbie error). All of a sudden, I hear this awful and LOUD roaring coming from the under the backseat. The only time it was quiet was when the car was not moving. I looked underneath the car and there was axle fluid everywhere! I put more in, but the damage was done. I have since replaced the rearend (try to get a friend to help put it in. It sucks to do it by yourself). You may also notice that your speedo reading is way out of whack. Replace that rear-end pronto and everything will be good (rearend-wise). Your engine will eventually tear that rearend apart.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 19, 2006
#6
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #6
killer medic said:
I bought my 67 coupe that way as well. It was originally an I6 and was upgraded (engine-wise) to a 302. I am still trying to find out EXACTLY what kind of car the engine came out of (I believe it came from a Comet).
Click to expand...
Don't worry about what that 302 came out of. Trying to find out what it came from is pointless. All applications shared the same basic block/crank/rods/heads with the exception of the Boss 302.
 

killer medic

Member
Mar 30, 2005
60
0
6
West Palm Beach, FL.
Oct 19, 2006
#7
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #7
D.Hearne said:
Don't worry about what that 302 came out of. Trying to find out what it came from is pointless. All applications shared the same basic block/crank/rods/heads with the exception of the Boss 302.
Click to expand...

Does that also apply to all electrical and vacuum applications? What about compression rations and cam information. If I were to plan on changing the head, cam, and intake, I guess it REALLY wouldn't matter since I have created a whole new configuration. I am just wondering if it is feasible to find out what I have to determine these configurations without tearing it apart (at least not yet). When I go to the auto part store and give the make and model of my car, of course there is no 302 option because it hadn't existed yet. If I told them it was a '68 mustang, would that be feasible, being the close similarities? BTW, how would I know if I don't have a Boss 302 configuration on my hands? I am really curious as hell to see if my engine in on the milder or wilder side. Thanks!!!
 

killer medic

Member
Mar 30, 2005
60
0
6
West Palm Beach, FL.
Oct 20, 2006
#8
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #8
Just curious...
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Oct 20, 2006
#9
  • Oct 20, 2006
  • #9
Post some casting numbers off the intake and other easy to read parts for a start. C8....... would be 1968, D7.... would be 1977, E5....would be 1985, etc.... 1985 was the start of the roller blocks.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Oct 21, 2006
#10
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #10
killer medic said:
Does that also apply to all electrical and vacuum applications? What about compression rations and cam information. If I were to plan on changing the head, cam, and intake, I guess it REALLY wouldn't matter since I have created a whole new configuration. I am just wondering if it is feasible to find out what I have to determine these configurations without tearing it apart (at least not yet). When I go to the auto part store and give the make and model of my car, of course there is no 302 option because it hadn't existed yet. If I told them it was a '68 mustang, would that be feasible, being the close similarities? BTW, how would I know if I don't have a Boss 302 configuration on my hands? I am really curious as hell to see if my engine in on the milder or wilder side. Thanks!!!
Click to expand...
Pretty much all the base model 302, 2 bbl motors in all applications used the same bunch of parts, from the first 68 motors to the end of carbs. There were minor revisions over the years, but it was a one size fits all proposition, the same basic engine was used in cars, pickups & vans. If you had a Boss 302 you'd know it. This was a COMPLETELY different animal. Cleveland style heads, aluminum intake, 4 bolt main block with screw in freeze plugs, finned aluminum valve covers, Holley 780 carb, plus other stuff. All it really lacked for all out performance was headers.
 

killer medic

Member
Mar 30, 2005
60
0
6
West Palm Beach, FL.
Oct 21, 2006
#11
  • Oct 21, 2006
  • #11
thanks for the education!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Rear alignment issues
  • Jayjay001
  • May 27, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
32
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Noobz347
N
1969 15x10 295's for rear. Modifications needed?
  • normg
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
112
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
GypsyR
G
E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
91
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
9
Will I feel a difference
  • 90Stanger302
  • Mar 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
208
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
374
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?