• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rod & Customs New Rear Coil-Over System

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68GT500KR_Vert
  • Start date Start date Jun 11, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 11, 2007
#1
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #1
http://www.rcmotorsports.net/RearCoiloverKit.html

What do you guys think?

I already own their front system.
 
J

jason@gmachine

Banned
Apr 15, 2007
91
0
0
Jun 11, 2007
#2
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #2
hmmm.....






Jason
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Jun 11, 2007
#3
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #3
Wish I had $1600 or whatever the cost is. Looks nice tho.
 

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Jun 11, 2007
#4
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #4
Definitely not feeling the top mount for the two upper arms. All of the forces acting on the differential are being put through a smallish peice of plate that is partially boxed. I'd much prefer a mount that included more of the bolts of the third memeber and was of a more compact design.
Though I will say it's definitely one of the more cost friendly setups... most of the other t-arm or 3-link varieties are in the 3500$ range.
 
G

Gailahan

Member
Sep 15, 2006
144
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Jun 11, 2007
#5
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #5
It really doesn't look so great to me.... but it is bolt on for whatever that counts. Looks like a very weak design though.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Jun 11, 2007
#6
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #6
I know they claim "no welding" but I would back up that upper control arm mount with something welded onto it and the floorpan. Unless it butts up completely against the floor. Although with every early Mustang unibody out there not being within 1/4" of each other I doubt it.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Jun 12, 2007
#7
  • Jun 12, 2007
  • #7
If you've got the front end already I say go for it.

It'll never bang corners like an M3 anyway, might as well make it look better and ride better in a straight line.
 
J

jason@gmachine

Banned
Apr 15, 2007
91
0
0
Jun 12, 2007
#8
  • Jun 12, 2007
  • #8
CraigMBA said:
If you've got the front end already I say go for it.

It'll never bang corners like an M3 anyway, might as well make it look better and ride better in a straight line.
Click to expand...

if there is a will then there is a way. look for some new serious stuff very soon!

Jason
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Jun 13, 2007
#9
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #9
i really like the idea of it but that upper mount does look really weak
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 13, 2007
#10
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #10
R&C Quality

I can tell you my front-end is very heavy duty and well built. Those parts that you think are thing bent sheet metal are thick plate steel. Call Willie he's very friendly and their supports is awesome, I had to send back my engine mounts and coil over springs because I'm putting a BB engine in now instead of a SB, he sent me them right back no charge. Most places charge you a restocking and shipping fee TCP did, Summit did, even whenit was their mistake.
 
M

mcode

Member
Dec 3, 2004
51
0
6
Jun 13, 2007
#11
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #11
I like it

looks good to me --i have been waiting for the evolution rear kit--but it is taking forever and it keeps on getting more expensive---originaly 2500 than 3500 --where does it all end
 
J

jason@gmachine

Banned
Apr 15, 2007
91
0
0
Jun 13, 2007
#12
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #12
mcode said:
looks good to me --i have been waiting for the evolution rear kit--but it is taking forever and it keeps on getting more expensive---originaly 2500 than 3500 --where does it all end
Click to expand...

see the problem is the geometry and the body. The body of the stang does not allow for good geometry to be made into a bold on kit. Its just not possible. So, the guys at EVO and us as well have decided to cut the body to make room for the upper link. There is still alot of fabrication with the kits. There will never be bolt on suspension for these cars that has good geometry. WE have tried countless designs and have even built one that fit the body for a customer that did not want to cut the floor. Our kit will be in the 3500 range and still require that the body be cut and there will be alot of welding to go along with that. There is just no other way to get a rear race geometry suspension in these cars, i wish there was but i have tried and failed. The body must be cut to obtain the best geometry!


Jason
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 13, 2007
#13
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #13
Bolt-on

But for a street car that's taken to the track one in a while these bolt-on systems are a big improvement over the orginal leaf-spring design.
 
J

jason@gmachine

Banned
Apr 15, 2007
91
0
0
Jun 13, 2007
#14
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #14
we have built a bolt in system for a custom application where the customer did not want to cut the floor, this was the upper are we used to clear the body and housing.






Jason
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Jun 13, 2007
#15
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #15
68GT500KR_Vert said:
But for a street car that's taken to the track one in a while these bolt-on systems are a big improvement over the orginal leaf-spring design.
Click to expand...

Um, I think that the Mustang II style front end is a huge step in the wrong direction over the stock stuff, but hey.......
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Jun 13, 2007
#16
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #16
Have you looked at Heidts 4-link-coil-over? For about $1300.00 you get a fully adjustable 4-link, panhard-bar, coil-over, frame connectors and drive-shaft loop. The shocks on the Heidts unit bolt to a square tube that should be stronger for the purpose of vertical loading from the coil-over.
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 13, 2007
#17
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #17
I looked at it

the quality of the Heidts unit is not as good, it seems cheap.

I needed the space in the engine bay to fit my 429SCJ engine; had to get rid of the shock towers.
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 13, 2007
#18
  • Jun 13, 2007
  • #18
my other option I like

is the TCP Airbar without the airshock. it gives me the option later to upgrade to the AirRide system when I can afford it.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Jun 14, 2007
#19
  • Jun 14, 2007
  • #19
68GT500KR_Vert said:
the quality of the Heidts unit is not as good, it seems cheap.

I needed the space in the engine bay to fit my 429SCJ engine; had to get rid of the shock towers.
Click to expand...

That's a compelling reason to do the Mustang II swap, but by adding the 429 you aren't planning on making the car dust an autocross or roadcourse anyway.
 

68GT500KR_Vert

5 Year Member
Aug 21, 2006
353
60
59
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 14, 2007
#20
  • Jun 14, 2007
  • #20
My car is just for play

But I'd like it to ride better. The weight difference is actually not that much compared to what others are doing putting on the new style engines with all the accessories.

The Tremecs transmissions with bellhousing/clutch/etc actually weight more than the C6/convertor.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sponsored New J&M Release: 2024+ S650 Full Front + Rear Stainless Steel Braided Brake Lines
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
334
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
896
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
312
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
379
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?