• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

SFI Balancers

  • Thread starter Thread starter arbailey
  • Start date Start date Sep 28, 2004

arbailey

Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
199
0
16
New Jersey
Sep 28, 2004
#1
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #1
I am looking into replacing my stock 140K mile harmonic balancer and was wondering about SFI rated balancers. If I have no plans of revving the motor past 6000 rpms, would I even benefit from an SFI approved balancer? I've read a few posts stating SFI balancers work best above 6500 rpms. Also, I noticed a lot of people recommend Powerbond units but when they receive them they say Pioneer on them. I found a non SFI Pioneer balancer at Advanced Auto for $59.98 (part # DA3021), is that the same as a non SFI Powerbond unit? Anybody have one? I want to get one with the elastomer bonded to the metal unlike the stock one, but like everyone else I don't want to waste money.
 

88POSLX

Founding Member
Sep 16, 2002
553
0
0
Red Deer, AB
Sep 28, 2004
#2
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #2
The whole point of the SFI is so it is track legal. I *think* once you need a rollbar you also need an SFI balancer. Not sure as I don't have the rulebook here, but it's somewhere around there.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#3
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #3
Depending on what kind of 1/4 mile time's your running some sanctioned racing division's will require you to run an SFI approved balancer. The whole point of an SFI balancer is they are designed not to explode into a million pieces....the same goes for SFI approved bellhousing's, flywheels, etc. etc. When ever your buying something that is SFI approved your buying a product that is saftey approved for the track.
If your running a mild 302 or higher then 11's in the 1/4 mile I woudn't worry too much about spending alot of money on an SFI balancer. The best non SFI balancer out there that is fairly decently priced are a Streetdampr (Similar to a Fluidampr exept non SFI). Check them out. Running a Streetdampr will require the use of a Crank pulley spacer as well. Stay away from cheapo brand's like CAT, Pro Form etc. etc. As far as I know the Powerbond balancer's arent too bad as well as Pioneer balancers.

Shon
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#4
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #4
Try to avoid running a fluidampr or similar type on the street.

Powerbonds balancer is cheap and of very high quality, about 175 for the sfi unit
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#5
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #5
What are you talking About?..... Fluidampr's and Streetdampr's are fine for both the street and strip....Myself personally and many other's I know have been running them for years. It's the cheapo brand's you want to stay away from.....stick with the phrase you pay for what you get.
You say not to run fluidampr but run a powerbond instead???....Make's alot of sense. Go from quality & performance to cheap crap.

Currently the best SFI approved balancer on the market is ATI...... It dosn't come cheap though.

Shon
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#6
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #6
the reason most people shy away from Fluidamprs is because most crank manufacturers suggest NOT getting a damper with ANY moving parts. the fluid (or other moving part) gets slung to the outer edges of the damper as the engine accelerates and adds extra stress to the crank.

When i called SCAT, they said DO NOT use one.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 28, 2004
#7
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #7
to answer your question, Michael Yount runs the Pioneer you asked about. i would too when i need one again.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#8
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #8

Scat probably say's bull like that cause they have there own brand of balancer's and they want you to buy there's. I like Scat product's by all means and am currently using there stuff in my 408 but I have to say there tech service sucks. When I called Scat I wasn't too impressed at all with the knowledge of there customer service. Not only that but Fluidampr dosn't use moving PARTS. It contains a special type of viscous silicone/liquid fluid. You may be correct Timmy but I have never heard any engine builder or Crank manufacturer say not too use Fluidampr/streetdampr. I know tone's of top end engine builder's that have no problem's with using Fluidampr.

Shon
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#9
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #9
go on hardcore, theres plenty of builders that do not care for the fluidamper, one of them being a small company called CHP
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#10
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #10
Hardcore?????
You really know what your talking about.... Just because a couple of company's don't like to use a certain product dosn't mean there crap. Usually all it take's is one faulty product for some people and all of a sudden it become's crap and they will never use it again. Also Alot of company's like CHP get special discount's from manufacture's if they push there product. I know CHP really pushes Probe stuff....Wonder Why??? It's all about buisness and money.
Everyone has there own preference and opinions...all I'm trying to say is there isn't a balancer out there that is perfect, they all have there own little disadvantages but I know that Fluidampr's are a great balancer that perform great and last long.

Shon
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 28, 2004
#11
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #11
what Timmy said is concurrent with what ive read (i do that a bit). they work well on high HP track cars (with very fast rpm build), but can leave something to be desired on street driven cars.

that said, to each his own - probably not a 'right' decision. i read a ton of balancer threads in a couple sites before getting mine and opinions differed widely.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#12
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #12
408stroker5.0 said:
I know CHP really pushes Probe stuff....Wonder Why??? It's all about business and money.


Shon
Click to expand...

Mark O'neal pushes Probe stuff for one reason, He manufactures the stuff ...............

I never once said they were crap. If you are happy with it, then fine. Hes better off hearing both sides of the issue before he buys soemthing. I personally dont want something with loose parts on the end of my crank.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#13
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #13
HISSIN you are correct. I have seen test's were balancer's such as the TCI Rattler, ATI, Fluidampr etc. etc. perform there best at high RPM's, and are really not nessasary on a street car. However Fluidampr's Non SFI aproved Streetdampr (Which Is The Balancer I'm Pushing) balancer has proven itself on the street and in test's many times.

Shon
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#14
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #14
TIMMY2734 said:
personally dont want something with loose parts on the end of my crank.
Click to expand...

Your thinking the Fluidampr, which is SFI approved and is better off on an engine that see's high RPM's often. The Streetdampr is a one piece balancer.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#15
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #15
408stroker5.0 said:
The best non SFI balancer out there that is fairly decently priced are a Streetdampr (Similar to a Fluidampr exept non SFI).
Shon
Click to expand...

When you wrote that i assumed they were the same design....

So bascially a whole debate over nuthin?

geez, i shoulda just went to bed
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 28, 2004
#16
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #16
408stroker5.0 said:
HISSIN you are correct. I have seen test's were balancer's such as the TCI Rattler, ATI, Fluidampr etc. etc. perform there best at high RPM's, and are really not nessasary on a street car. However Fluidampr's Non SFI aproved Streetdampr (Which Is The Balancer I'm Pushing) balancer has proven itself on the street and in test's many times.

Shon
Click to expand...
Shon, that works for me.

after a lot of reading, i decided that the possible disadvantages of a fluid-style damper outweighed any possible advantage for MY needs. i seldom rev over 3K, so i disregarded info that did not pertain to me and what i was after (though some of it got stuck in my head. LOL).

as i think we have all said, it comes down to personal choice - we all have different set ups, driving habits and needs, etc. i have not read much (if anything) about non-SFI fluid dampers; i am not sure how their characteristics are different than an SFI unit - so what you said sounds fine to me. how are they different? now you got me curious.
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#17
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #17
That's Funny all this arguing for Nothing... Yes The Fluiddampr and Streetdampr are two different balancer's. (Same Company Though) The Fluidampr is best used in racing, and is a two piece balancer. The Streetdampr is Non SFI approved balancer and is a one piece balancer and was designed for the street/strip. Both balancers use the same fluid inside.
Sorry Timmy if you were taking my comment's the wrong way....peace.
www.Fluidampr.com

Shon
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Sep 28, 2004
#18
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #18
If I took offense, i would have typed LIKE THIS
 

408stroker5.0

The world would be a better place if all males jus
Mar 10, 2004
639
0
16
Bonnyville, Alberta, CANADA
Sep 28, 2004
#19
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #19
HISSIN50 said:
Shon, that works for me.

after a lot of reading, i decided that the possible disadvantages of a fluid-style damper outweighed any possible advantage for MY needs. i seldom rev over 3K, so i disregarded info that did not pertain to me and what i was after (though some of it got stuck in my head. LOL).

as i think we have all said, it comes down to personal choice - we all have different set ups, driving habits and needs, etc. i have not read much (if anything) about non-SFI fluid dampers; i am not sure how their characteristics are different than an SFI unit - so what you said sounds fine to me. how are they different? now you got me curious.
Click to expand...


Sound's good to me as well Hissin.....we all have our own preference. I kind of mentioned it near the top of this thread on the difference between SFI approved and non SFI. Check It Out. If your really curious on the design difference check out www.Fluidampr.com
 

runningmole

Founding Member
Jun 24, 2002
1,127
0
36
San Diego, CA
Sep 29, 2004
#20
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #20
I have an aluminum Romac on my car right now. When the stock balancer was replaced on my stock motor, a Motorsport was put on. 99 bucks I think. Did the trick for daily driving
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
468
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
SOLD 1993 Reef Blue 2 Tone GT Convertible 80k miles
  • ReefBlueGT
  • Jul 29, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jul 29, 2022
ReefBlueGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?