• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Shorties or longtubes ??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stangfreak95
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2005

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Mar 30, 2005
#1
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #1
ok last one.....Shorties or longtubes ??
 

LoudToy958

Member
Mar 30, 2005
435
0
16
Bremerton, WA
Mar 30, 2005
#2
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #2
Long tubes. I did the shortys once, and regreted the hell out of it. I just did LTs, and I am a very happy camper, ah er Cobra driver I mean.

Totaly changes the tone. Nice at idle, screams like a rabbit gettin F***** by a Rhino at full Throttle. Gotta love it. Little more money now will make you happy later. You know deep down you want to do LTs........
 

cavscout371

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
277
0
0
Mar 30, 2005
#3
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #3
be a man jack up the engine and do the l/t's
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Mar 30, 2005
#4
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #4
LT's are better in every way, except when it comes time to pass emissions. And if it gets chilly where you are (and you drive the Mustang then), then you want to at least keep regular size crank & alternator pullies if you go with LT's. Helps keep them O2's toasty.

Dave
 

Jerry Leaming

Member
Nov 2, 2003
477
2
18
Olympia Wa
Mar 30, 2005
#5
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #5
One of the magazines compared BBK longtubes agianst short tubes (equal and unequal) on a 400 plus hp engine. To my surprise they found very little difference between the 1 5/8" headers and if I recall right the short tube unequal headers seem to beat out all of them by a few HP. Now I have always heard LT are the way to go but after reading that I kept my shorties.

Anybody else remember reading this article?
 

FastFord

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
380
0
0
Washington
Mar 30, 2005
#6
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #6
LTs.... Well worth the work!!
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Mar 30, 2005
#7
  • Mar 30, 2005
  • #7
I did not see the referenced article. However, every test I have ever seen has pegged the long-tubes as far better for torque production (even if both were close on horsepower). I went with long-tubes and have been glad ever since.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Dipstick
  • wccurtis1963
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
184
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
Willybill32
W
Helpful information for O2 sensors and Longtube headers
  • Warhorse85
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
217
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Warhorse85
W
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
753
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
keel
J
4 bank eliminator chip
  • JJ's90fox
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
157
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
D
Exhaust set up
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
639
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?