• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Shorty & LT Comparison Pulls

  • Thread starter Thread starter final5-0
  • Start date Start date Jul 9, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#1
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #1
I was doing a bit of research and I stumbled upon these combos

Thought ya'll might like to S E E something I've been saying

These FTI AFR Edel combos are very similar EXCEPT for the headers

Now Mr. C likes to keep his specs on the QT
but
I'm sure I won't be doing anything wrong when I say I've seen others

True ... they are all different
but
They don't seem to be that much different

IMHO ... I feel the difference you see between these two combos
Its mostly due the the header choice

If you got Q's or comments ... feel to let em rip

Here is the hard data



Here they are! ... Side by Side

Grady

 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Jul 9, 2007
#2
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #2
There was a article in MM&FF that did a comparison of equal, un equal & full length headers. The difference between the 3 was around 10 hp difference between the highest and lowest. Take it how you want from MM&FF?
 
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Jul 9, 2007
#3
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #3
interesting comparison

look at that low-end
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Jul 9, 2007
#4
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #4
at 3250 rpms the long tubes are beating the shorties by 30 lbs of torque, thats a BIG margin if u ask me. This is what i like to see.....i try telling my friends all the time peak numbers ant ****......ITS the whole CURVE....the longtubes are definitely worth it in this comparison
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 9, 2007
#5
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #5
WOW! LT = incredible driveability difference on the 5.0. LT's should be a MUST for auto's. Imagine the difference when there is no clutch!

Hey Grady, with my 414ci, do you think I will be missing ALOT of low end TQ? I mean do you think it applies to larger motors as well? The engine is by definition excellent low end of course...but do you have any graphs for big blocks (so to speak)..I am curious.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#6
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #6
DDSTANG94 said:
at 3250 rpms the long tubes are beating the shorties by 30 lbs of torque, thats a BIG margin if u ask me. This is what i like to see.....i try telling my friends all the time peak numbers ant ****......ITS the whole CURVE....the longtubes are definitely worth it in this comparison
Click to expand...

DING DING DING

We got a Winner

Give this man a Cigar

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#7
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #7
cbarr300 said:
interesting comparison

look at that low-end
Click to expand...

You picked up on what I been saying for a while now ... didn't you Clay

Funny ... not funny ha ha ... but ... Funny strange
I've posted up strong low end curves before
but
Not much has ever been said about it

40#'s at 3K

heck fire ... look at 2800 ... a tad over 50#'s

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#8
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #8
Pokageek said:
WOW! LT = incredible driveability difference on the 5.0. LT's should be a MUST for auto's. Imagine the difference when there is no clutch!

Hey Grady, with my 414ci, do you think I will be missing ALOT of low end TQ? I mean do you think it applies to larger motors as well? The engine is by definition excellent low end of course...but do you have any graphs for big blocks (so to speak)..I am curious.
Click to expand...

Well Keith

One usually doesn't worry about low end torque with B I G cubes

Grady
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jul 9, 2007
#9
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #9
also look at the trans, arent the TKO's supposed to eat up more hp/tq?


but i do agree that low end TQ is exactly what you want when building a combo tho
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#10
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #10
94CobraPace said:
There was a article in MM&FF that did a comparison of equal, un equal & full length headers. The difference between the 3 was around 10 hp difference between the highest and lowest. Take it how you want from MM&FF?
Click to expand...

Peak ain't always what a combo is about

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 9, 2007
#11
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #11
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/techarticles/29618_short_long_tube_headers_test/index.html

Ok. Now for the cross debate... For folks that haven't noticed ANY difference with LT's... What do you make of the article above?

I think the moral here might be that long-tubes will make a difference on h/c/i but not mild bolt on stock..
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#12
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #12
Pokageek said:
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/techarticles/29618_short_long_tube_headers_test/index.html

Ok. Now for the cross debate... For folks that haven't noticed ANY difference with LT's... What do you make of the article above?
Click to expand...

Thats a little baby stocker

N O kinda header is gonna do much for it :Word:

Grady
 
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Jul 9, 2007
#13
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #13
the more air you flow, the more difference it'll make.

and yup, been following that one for a while now, Grady. I've always seen the great low-end torque a lot of guys on this forum put out...and I also noticed that a majority had LTs...I wanted some low-end..so I got LTs, and I'm more than happy. My philosophy was....if I was to go and build a house for the first time...would I listen to the guy who is having the house built for him, or would I listen to the guy that's been doing this his whole life. Obviously I would ask the guy with the experience. The same holds true with modding cars.....I don't like going off of just word of mouth....actual proof is what it's all about.

I was talking to a few people the other day about the diff. in LT vs. shorty. One guy said that he gained horsepower with the shorties and he only lost a bit of torque....so he concluded the shorties were better. Welllll, I asked him if those were peak numbers...and of course he said, "Yeah." I'm trying to get him to get another dyno chart so I can compare and show him his before and after area under the curve.

Look at my curve...I'd be willing to bet my bottom dollar that if I put some shorties on there....my low end would look like poopy. Granted, my top end *may* look a bit better......I don't think the top-end gain would equal out the low-end loss.

 

Therian

The Highlander
Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
0
1
0
Waterloo, Ontario
Jul 9, 2007
#14
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #14
I love my rusty longtubes
 
C

cbarr300

Member
Jun 6, 2006
746
0
17
goose creek, SC
Jul 9, 2007
#15
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #15
It's a mustang....it's dirty but quick
 
R

RAD

New Member
Jun 16, 2006
167
0
0
Jul 9, 2007
#16
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #16
Is there a brand of longtubes that will give the most gains ?
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Jul 9, 2007
#17
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #17
Not that it really matters, but I have heard that LT's arn't emissions legal...confirm/deny anyone???
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 9, 2007
#18
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #18
earleys94gt said:
Not that it really matters, but I have heard that LT's arn't emissions legal...confirm/deny anyone???
Click to expand...


Depends on state. Here in MD they are not looking for for it. May depend on whether they have an EGR bung. Most I have seen don't.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 9, 2007
#19
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #19
Good stuff Grady, I like comparisons...

A few things I noticed, the longtube combo had a tweecer and t5, compared to the shorty header one (fms) with a tko, which eats up a bit more power if I understand correctly. 3% more?

Now onto my own observations...

I really looked into the longtube vs. shorty debate when I was deciding and it appeared to me to not really be worth much, as far as the price goes...

Cammin2v swapped from shorties to longtubes on his FTI h/c/i car and gained .05 on his e.t. if I recall, when he PM'ed me about it sometime back. My numbers maybe off a bit...

Now, I swapped from some dented-in rusty Mac shorties, to new BBK longtubes, along with having my Performer lower ported by tmoss (great job by the way), and a 306 (rebuilt 302) by Keith Craft. I have gained 1.3mph with those 3 changes. It is my personal belief that the added power did not come from the longtubes, but more so from the other changes: Ported to match lower and slightly higher compression 306...

Longtubes pick up a bit down low and in the mid-range, but most of my racing is from the upper midrange to higher rpm, so the longtubes don't get much of a chance to shine 95% of the track.

The one pro I have about longtubes is the sound I love it...

To each his own, we all have our opinions and we have good reasons, like Grady who puts pen to paper, but I think for the majority of combos, longtubes should be gone with if you are looking for every last bit of edge you can get
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 9, 2007
#20
  • Jul 9, 2007
  • #20
I always try to keep an open mind and be fair with these kind of
things so I feel the need to point this out

Working with the spark and fuel tables can make a difference in the
low and mid range as well

It is possible the LT combo may have a leg up on the shorty combo in
that department

But ... Never the Less .............

I have seen over the years the scavenging benefit that goes along with
LT's can make a difference.

Simply Put ... Look at enough combos ... You'll see tendencies develop

Grady
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Electrical Cylinder 4 Misfire
  • paddyrk
  • Oct 11, 2021
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 12, 2021
paddyrk
J
Fuel stroker help
  • junkyardwarrior
  • Jan 16, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2021
junkyardwarrior
J
W
Hopefully, I'm doing this right.
  • Wireflight
  • Apr 10, 2021
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
11
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Aug 4, 2021
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?